Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Missouri Unified County

Court

Missouri Unified County

Missouri

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-08-23
Type Ac Other Real Estate Actions
Docket 38 entries
Disposition tried by court-civil

Parties

Plaintiff Jungs Station Associates, Lp, A Limited Partnership|Dorsey, Richard P Iii
Defendant Goggins, Dawn
Photo of Hon. Steimel Norman C Iii

Judge

Hon. Steimel Norman C Iii

St. Charles County (MO)

Missouri

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  2. Garn Release/Return/Recall Release on Garnishment/Execution Number 23-GARN-220
  3. Satisfaction of Judgment Filed Satisfaction of Judgment. COMES NOW THE PLAINTIFF AND FILES "SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT". Filed By: RICHARD P DORSEY III On Behalf Of: JUNGS STATION ASSOCIATES, LP, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
  4. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  5. Garnishment Returned Served Document ID - 23-GARN-220; Served To - QUEST DIANOSTICS - NEW BALLAS; Server - ; Served Date - 03-FEB-23; Served Time - 11:23:00; Service Type - Sheriff Department; Reason Description - Served
  6. Notice of Service 23-GARN-220; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service.
  7. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  8. Garnishment Paid to Court 23-GARN-220
  9. Execution/Garnishment Issued This is garnishment 23-GARN-220 for DAWN GOGGINS; returnable date: CONTINUOUS; Garnishee: QUEST DIANOSTICS - NEW BALLAS
  10. Request for Execution/Garnish Garnishment. Filed By: RICHARD P DORSEY III On Behalf Of: JUNGS STATION ASSOCIATES, LP, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
  11. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  12. Judgment Entered On the 2nd day of December 2022, Plaintiff Jungs Station Associates, L.P., hereinafter referred to as Landlord, appeared with its attorney, Richard P. Dorsey. Defendant Dawn Goggins, hereinafter referred to as Tenant, appeared in person pro se. This cause coming on regularly to be heard and being called, Plaintiff announced ready for trial, whereupon the Court, after hearing the evidence, took the matter under advisement. Having considered all of the evidence, the Court now finds, orders, adjudges, and decrees as follows: 1. On November 4, 2020, Landlord and Tenant entered into a written lease for the premises known and numbered as 1306 Woodridge Drive, St. Peters, MO 63376 for the lease term January 27, 2021 through April 26, 2022. Under the terms of the lease, Tenant was to pay monthly rent of $841.00, payable in advance on the first day of the month. If the monthly rent payment was paid after the fifth day of the month, a late fee of $50.00 was to be paid. The lease also contained a provision for the recovery of attorney's fees in the event of breach by Tenant. See, Pl. Ex. 1. 2. Tenant voluntarily vacated the premises on March 19, 2022. Although Tenant paid her rent for March, she paid no rent for the month of April, the final month of her lease. From the evidence presented, the Court finds Tenant owes $841.00 in unpaid rent, $50.00 in late fees, and $94.95 for unpaid water and trash fees, for a total due of $985.95. 3. There was some damage to the leased premises. From the limited evidence presented at trial, the Court finds the damages to Landlord's property to be $271.00. 4. As set forth above, the parties' lease provides for the recovery of attorney fees in the event of a breach by Tenant. Landlord has incurred a reasonable attorney's fee of $550.00 in pursuing this matter through trial. WHEREFORE IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Plaintiff is awarded judgment against Defendant for the sum of $985.95 in unpaid rent, late charges, and utilities, and $271.00 for damages to the property, for a total award of $1,256.95. Plaintiff is further awarded judgment against Defendant for the sum of $550.00 as and for attorney's fees. Court costs of $93.50 are taxed to Defendant. SO ORDERED: Dated: 12/6/22 NORMAN C. STEIMEL III, #27650 Associate Circuit Judge, Div. 10 St. Charles County, Missouri Filed By: NORMAN C STEIMEL III Associated Entries: 12/02/2022 - Cause Taken Under Advisement +
  13. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  14. Cause Taken Under Advisement RECORDED IN COURTROOM 315. PAW Filed By: NORMAN C STEIMEL III Associated Entries: 12/06/2022 - Judgment Entered +
  15. Tried by Court-Civil Associated Entries: 10/07/2022 - Court Trial Scheduled Associated Entries: 10/07/2022 - Hearing Continued/Rescheduled + Scheduled For: 12/02/2022; 9:00 AM; NORMAN C STEIMEL III ; 1; St Charles Circuit Div
  16. Sound Recording Log Sheet
  17. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  18. Court Trial Scheduled Associated Entries: 12/02/2022 - Tried by Court-Civil Scheduled For: 12/02/2022; 9:00 AM; NORMAN C STEIMEL III ; 1; St Charles Circuit Div
  19. Hearing Continued/Rescheduled CONTINUED TO 12/2/22 FOR TRIAL AT 9:00 AM Associated Entries: 08/24/2022 - Civil Setting Scheduled Associated Entries: 12/02/2022 - Tried by Court-Civil Hearing Continued From: 10/07/2022; 9:00 AM Civil Setting
  20. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  21. Ord Tx Priv Procss Server Fees Filed By: NORMAN C STEIMEL III Associated Entries: 09/12/2022 - Memorandum Filed +
  22. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  23. Memorandum Filed Taxing Memo. Filed By: RICHARD P DORSEY III On Behalf Of: JUNGS STATION ASSOCIATES, LP, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Associated Entries: 09/19/2022 - Ord Tx Priv Procss Server Fees
  24. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  25. Summons Personally Served Document ID - 22-SMLT-1126; Served To - GOGGINS, DAWN; Server - CULP, JOEL; Served Date - 05-SEP-22; Served Time - 08:30:00; Service Type - Special Process Server; Reason Description - Served
  26. Notice of Service Notice of Service. Filed By: RICHARD P DORSEY III On Behalf Of: JUNGS STATION ASSOCIATES, LP, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
  27. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  28. Filing: CONSENT TO MEDIATION FORM Filed By: DAWN GOGGINS
  29. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  30. Summons Issued-Landlord/Tenant Document ID: 22-SMLT-1126, for GOGGINS, DAWN. SUMMONS REISSUED AND ATTACHED IN PDF FORM FOR ATTORNEY TO RETRIEVE FROM SECURE CASE.NET. PAW
  31. Order - Special Process Server Associated Entries: 08/23/2022 - Motion Special Process Server +
  32. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  33. Civil Setting Scheduled Associated Entries: 10/07/2022 - Hearing Continued/Rescheduled + Scheduled For: 10/07/2022; 9:00 AM; NORMAN C STEIMEL III ; 1; St Charles Circuit Div
  34. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  35. Filing Info Sheet eFiling Filed By: RICHARD P DORSEY III
  36. Note to Clerk eFiling Filed By: RICHARD P DORSEY III
  37. Motion Special Process Server Motion for Special Process Server. Filed By: RICHARD P DORSEY III On Behalf Of: JUNGS STATION ASSOCIATES, LP, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Associated Entries: 08/25/2022 - Order - Special Process Server
  38. Pet Filed in Associate Ct Petition for Rent and Damages. Filed By: RICHARD P DORSEY III

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more