Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Oklahoma unified county

Court

Oklahoma unified county

Oklahoma

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-09-26
Type Dissolution Of Marriage
Docket 45 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Garrisonbrendalee,
Defendant Garrisonmartydale,
Photo of Hon. BEARE, MINDY M.

Judge

Hon. BEARE, MINDY M.

Pittsburg County (OK)

Oklahoma

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  2. LENGTHY TRIAL FUND
  3. COURTHOUSE SECURITY FEE
  4. 10% OF CHSC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  5. STATE JUDICIAL REV. FUND INTERPRETER & TRANSLATOR SERVICES
  6. 15% TO DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND
  7. COURT CLERK PRESERVATION FUND
  8. F AND E ISSUING SUMMONS FOR RESPONDENT TO ATTORNEY
  9. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE JERRY L BREATHWIT FOR PETITIONER
  10. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE COURTNEY L. EAGAN FOR RESPONDENT
  11. RESPONDENT'S APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY ORDER
  12. RESPONSE TO PETITION AND RESPONDENT'S COUNTERCLAIM
  13. PROOF OF SERVICE SERVED MARTY DALE GARRISON ON 09/30/23
  14. MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL AND ALLOW WITHDRAWAL
  15. ORDER ALLOWING SUBSTITUE COUNSEL AND WITHDRAWAL S/BEARE
  16. F&E ENTRY OF APPEARANCE (BLAKE E. LYNCH, FOR PETITIONER)
  17. F&E NOTICE OF SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM
  18. F&E MOTION TO SET STATUS ON ALL PENDING MOTIONS
  19. F&E ORDER SETTING HEARING. MATTER SET FOR JULY 17, 2024, AT 1:30 P.M. S/BEARE
  20. F&E 7/17/24 CT. MIN. COMES ON FOR: STATUS. RULING: COUNSEL TO CONTACT COURT FOR POTENTIAL DATES FOR A FINAL HEARING. IF A DATE IS AGREED UPON, MATTER WILL NEED TO BE SET FOR PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE ON A DOCKET AT LEAST TWO WEEKS PRIOR TO THE FINAL HEARING. S/BEARE
  21. F&E CT. MIN. COMES ON FOR: SCHEDULING. RULING: THE ABOVE CASE IS SET FOR PRE-TRIAL ON SEPTEMBER 25, 2024 AT 1:30 P.M. AND FINAL HEARING ON OCTOBER 28, 2024 AT 1:30 P.M. S/BEARE
  22. F&E PRE-TRIAL ORDER. TRIAL DATE OCTOBER 28, 2024, AT 1:30 P.M. S/BEARE
  23. MINUTE ORDER DATED 9/25/24. COMES ON FOR: PRE TRIAL. RULING: PRE-TRIAL ORDER APPROVED THIS DATE. S/BEARE
  24. F&E NOTICE OF SUBPOENA, TO ALL PARTIES: BRAD HONEL, REP. OF OKC ABSTRACT & TITLE CO., B. HONEL AND A. O'NEAL. MATTER SET FOR OCTOBER 28, 2024 AT 1:30 P.M. S/BEARE
  25. F&E RESPONDENT'S MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE
  26. F&E CT. MIN. COMES ON FOR: FINAL HEARING. RULING: MATTER PREVIOUSLY SET FOR OCTOBER 28, 2024 AT 1:30 P.M. IS RESET FOR FEBRUARY 18, 2025 AT 1:30 P.M. OVER THE OBJECTION OF PETITIONER'S COUNSEL. S/BEARE
  27. F&E ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT'S MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE. TRIAL SET FOR FEBRUARY 18, 2025 AT 1:30 P.M. S/BEARE
  28. F&E SUBPOENA. S/BEARE
  29. NOTICE OF SUBPOENA ISSUED TO ALL PARTIES ATTACHED HERETO
  30. F&E ISS. SUBPOENA BACK TO ATTY. S/BEARE
  31. F&E CT. MIN. COMES ON FOR: FINAL HEARING. RULING: AT THE REQUEST OF PETITIONER, ABOVE MATTER CONTINUED TO MARCH 31, 2025 AT 1:30 P.M. WITHOUT OBJECTION FROM RESPONDENT. S/BEARE
  32. F&E CT. MIN. COMES ON FOR: FINAL HEARING. RULING: BOTH PARTIES SUBMITTED ALL THEIR TESTIMONY AND EXHIBITS IN THIS MATTER. PARTIES ARE DIVORCED THIS DATE. COUNSEL TO SUBMIT PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW WITHIN TEN DAYS. THE COURT WILL ISSUE AN ORDER WITHIN FIVE DAYS OF RECEIPT. S/BEARE
  33. F&E CT. MIN. COMES ON FOR: EXTENSION OF TIME. RULING: COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT HAS REQUESTED ADDITIONAL TIME FOR PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW TO BE SUBMITTED (VIA EMAIL RECEIVED THIS DATE). COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER HAS NO OBJECTION. THE NEW DEADLINE FOR BOTH PARTIES IS APRIL 15, 2025. S/BEARE
  34. F&E PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
  35. F&E RESPONDENT'S PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
  36. F&E FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW. MR. LYNCH IS TO PREPARE AND SUBMIT THE DECREE. MATTER SET FOR MAY 21, 2025, AT 1:30 P.M. TO MAKE SURE THE ORDER HAS BEEN SUBMITTED. S/BEARE
  37. F&E CT. MIN. COMES ON FOR: STATUS OF ORDER. RULING: MR. PRATT REPORTED THAT THE ORDER WAS SENT TO MR. SEACAT APRIL 23, 2025. AS OF TODAY, THE ORDER HAS NOT BEEN RETURNED. THIS MATTER IS SET FOR STATUS OF ORDER MAY 28, 2025, AT 1:30 P.M. IF THERE ARE ISSUES WITH THE ORDER, MR. SEACAT NEEDS TO INFORM MR. LYNCH OF ANY ISSUES PRIOR TO THAT DATE. S/BEARE
  38. F&E DECREE OF DISSOLUTION. S/BEARE
  39. F&E CT. MIN. COMES ON FOR: STATUS OF ORDER. RULING: STRICKEN AS MOOT, ORDER WAS PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. S/BEARE

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more