Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Missouri Unified County

Court

Missouri Unified County

Missouri

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-03-03
Type Cc Breach Of Contract
Docket 25 entries
Disposition default judgment

Parties

Plaintiff Caplaco Twentytwo, Inc.|Ankrom, Grant|Dierbergs Mackenzie Point Partnership, L.p.|Ankrom, Grant
Defendant Malone, Dawn M
Photo of Hon. Corrigan William M

Judge

Hon. Corrigan William M

St. Louis County (MO)

Missouri

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  2. Judge/Clerk - Note A COPY OF THE FINAL ORDER AND JUDGMENT WAS MAILED TO THE DEFENDANT ON THIS DATE.
  3. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  4. Judgment Entered IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED THAT JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFFS CAPLACO TWENTY-TWO, INC. AND DIERBERGS MACKENZIE POINT PARTNERSHIP, L.P. AND AGAINST DEFENDANT DAWN MALONE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED THAT PLAINTIFFS CAPLACO TWENTY-TWO, INC. AND DIERBERGS MACKENZIE POINT PARTNERSHIP, L.P. ARE AWARDED DAMAGES FOR A TOTAL AMOUNT OF $34,555.51. SO ORDERED: JUDGE WILLIAM M. CORRIGAN, JR.
  5. Default Judgment Associated Entries: 06/07/2022 - Hearing Continued/Rescheduled Associated Entries: 06/10/2022 - Motion Hearing Scheduled Scheduled For: 06/28/2022; 9:00 AM; WILLIAM M. CORRIGAN JR. ; St Louis County
  6. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  7. Motion Hearing Scheduled Associated Entries: 06/28/2022 - Default Judgment Scheduled For: 06/28/2022; 9:00 AM; WILLIAM M. CORRIGAN JR. ; St Louis County
  8. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  9. Hearing Continued/Rescheduled Associated Entries: 06/06/2022 - Motion Hearing Scheduled Associated Entries: 06/28/2022 - Default Judgment Hearing Continued From: 06/07/2022; 8:00 AM Motion Hearing
  10. Amended Notice of Hrng Filed Notice of Hearing. Filed By: GRANT ANKROM On Behalf Of: CAPLACO TWENTY-TWO, INC.
  11. Motion for Default Judgment Motion for Default Judgment. Filed By: GRANT ANKROM On Behalf Of: DIERBERGS MACKENZIE POINT PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
  12. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  13. Motion Hearing Scheduled Associated Entries: 06/07/2022 - Hearing Continued/Rescheduled Scheduled For: 06/07/2022; 8:00 AM; WILLIAM M. CORRIGAN JR. ; St Louis County
  14. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  15. Notice of Hearing Filed Notice of Hearing. Filed By: GRANT ANKROM On Behalf Of: CAPLACO TWENTY-TWO, INC., DIERBERGS MACKENZIE POINT PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
  16. Motion for Default Judgment Motion for Default Judgment. Filed By: GRANT ANKROM
  17. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  18. Family Member/Roommate Served Document ID - 22-SMCC-2049; Served To - MALONE, DAWN M; Server - ; Served Date - 19-MAR-22; Served Time - 00:00:00; Service Type - Special Process Server; Reason Description - Served
  19. Affidavit Filed Affidavit of Service of Summons on Dawn Malone. Filed By: GRANT ANKROM On Behalf Of: CAPLACO TWENTY-TWO, INC.
  20. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  21. Summons Issued-Circuit Document ID: 22-SMCC-2049, for MALONE, DAWN M.Summons Attached in PDF Form for Attorney to Retrieve from Secure Case.Net and Process for Service.
  22. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  23. Filing Info Sheet eFiling Filed By: GRANT ANKROM
  24. Motion Special Process Server Request for Appointment of Process Server. Filed By: GRANT ANKROM On Behalf Of: CAPLACO TWENTY-TWO, INC., DIERBERGS MACKENZIE POINT PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
  25. Pet Filed in Circuit Ct Petition; Exhibit 1; Exhibit 2. Filed By: GRANT ANKROM

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more