Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Fulton Co

Court

Fulton Co

Georgia

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-09-14
Status Open
Type Tort
Docket 74 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Ayana, Fennel
Defendant Eskandar, Natalie
Photo of Hon. Dixon Myra H

Judge

Hon. Dixon Myra H

Fulton County (GA)

Georgia

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. Case Initiation Form
  2. View Document case initiation form- Fennel.pdf
  3. Comment case initiation form
  4. Summons
  5. View Document um summons -Fennel.pdf
  6. Comment summons
  7. Summons
  8. View Document summons-Fennel.pdf
  9. Comment summons
  10. COMPLAINT
  11. View Document Complaint-Fennel.pdf
  12. Comment complaint
  13. Discovery
  14. View Document 5.2- def eskandar-Fennel (1).pdf
  15. Comment rule 5.2 certificate
  16. Discovery
  17. View Document Rule 5.2 UM-Fennel.pdf
  18. Comment rule 5.2 certificate
  19. AFFIDAVIT
  20. View Document AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE UPON NATALIE ESKANDAR_001.pdf
  21. Comment affidavit
  22. AFFIDAVIT
  23. View Document AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE UPON ALLSTATE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURAN_004.pdf
  24. Comment affidavit
  25. LEAVE OF ABSENCE
  26. View Document LOA_Fennel vs. Eskandar & Allstate-0688765395.2.pdf
  27. Comment LOA
  28. Discovery
  29. View Document Resp_Req Admiss_Fennel vs. Eskandar & Allstate-0688765395.2.pdf
  30. Comment admissions
  31. ANSWER
  32. View Document Ans_Fennel vs. Eskandar & Allstate-0688765395.2.pdf
  33. Comment answer
  34. Discovery
  35. View Document 5.2_Fennel vs. Eskandar & Allstate-0688765395.2.pdf
  36. Comment 5.2
  37. Jury Trial Demand
  38. View Document Jur_Fennel vs. Eskandar & Allstate-0688765395.2.pdf
  39. Comment jury demand
  40. Discovery
  41. View Document ROGs Def_Fennel vs. Eskandar & Allstate-0688765395.2.pdf
  42. Comment ROGs Def
  43. Discovery
  44. View Document RPDs Def_Fennel vs. Eskandar & Allstate-0688765395.2.pdf
  45. Comment RPDs Def
  46. Discovery
  47. View Document ROGs Plt_Fennel vs. Eskandar & Allstate-0688765395.2.pdf
  48. Comment ROGs Plt
  49. Discovery
  50. View Document RPDs Plt_Fennel vs. Eskandar & Allstate-0688765395.2.pdf
  51. Comment RPDs Plt
  52. ANSWER
  53. View Document ANS DEF.pdf
  54. Comment ANSWER AND DEFENSES OF DEFENDANT NATALIE ESKANDAR
  55. Jury Trial Demand
  56. View Document JURY DEMAND.pdf
  57. Comment DEFENDANTS DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
  58. Discovery
  59. View Document DEF 1ST ROG TO PLT.pdf
  60. Comment DEFENDANT'S FIRST INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF AYANA FENNELL
  61. Discovery
  62. View Document DEF 1ST RFP TO PLT.pdf
  63. Comment DEFENDANT'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO PLAINTIFF AYANA FENNELL
  64. Response
  65. View Document DEF RESP TO PLT RFA.pdf
  66. Comment DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION
  67. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
  68. View Document COS DISC.pdf
  69. Comment CERTIFICATE OF SERVING DISCOVERY
  70. LEAVE OF ABSENCE
  71. View Document LOA.pdf
  72. Comment NOTICE OF LEAVE OF ABSENCE
  73. NOTICE
  74. View Document PLT DEPO NTC.pdf

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more