Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-01-25
Status INACTIVE
Type Miscellaneous Other
Docket 43 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Eugene Litvak
Defendant Winncom Technologies Corp.|Aaron Savy|John Or Jane Doe 1 4
Photo of Hon. Kenneth R Callahan

Judge

Hon. Kenneth R Callahan

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED: COMPLAINT
  2. JUDGMENT ENTRY(49148870) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: LAUREN M. DRABIC [email protected]
  3. JUDGMENT ENTRY(49148869) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: MICHELE L JAKUBS [email protected]
  4. JUDGMENT ENTRY(49148868) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: RICHARD C HABER [email protected]
  5. PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES THIS CASE IS HEREBY DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE WITH EACH PARTY TO BEAR THEIR OWN COSTS. COURT COST ASSESSED AS EACH THEIR OWN. PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  6. FINAL PRETRIAL SCHEDULED FOR 02/21/2023 AT 01:30 PM IS CANCELLED.
  7. TRIAL BY JURY SCHEDULED FOR 04/24/2023 AT 09:00 AM IS CANCELLED.
  8. STIPULATION FILED BY P1 EUGENE LITVAK ATTORNEY RICHARD C HABER 0046788 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
  9. FINAL PRETRIAL SCHEDULED FOR 11/15/2022 AT 01:30 PM IS CANCELLED.
  10. AT THE REQUEST OF THE PARTIES THE CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE IS HEREBY MODIFIED AS FOLLOWS. PLAINTIFF'S EXPERT REPORT IS DUE BY 10/31/22. DEFENDANT'S EXPERT REPORT IS DUE BY 11/30/22. DISCOVERY TO BE COMPLETED BY 10/31/22. DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS TO BE FILED BY 11/30/22. BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO BE FILED BY 12/30/22. REPLY BRIEF TO BE FILED BY 1/9/23. FINAL PRETRIAL REMAINS SET FOR 2/21/23 AND TRIAL REMAINS SET FOR 4/24/23. NOTICE ISSUED
  11. FINAL PRETRIAL SET FOR 02/21/2023 AT 01:30 PM. ALL PARTIES AND CLAIM REPRESENTATIVES TO BE PRESENT. TRIAL BY JURY SET FOR 04/24/2023 AT 09:00 AM. COUNSEL FOR THE RESPECTIVE PARTIES SHALL FURNISH THE COURT WITH A TRIAL BRIEF AT LEAST 2 DAYS PRIOR TO THE DATE ASSIGNED FOR TRIAL. THESE BRIEFS SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING: - A SUCCINCT STATEMENT OF THE KIND OF ACTION; - A CLEAR STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES INVOLVED; - A SUMMARY OF THE FACTUAL SITUATION IN REGARD TO EACH CLAIM OR DEFENSE; - AN ITEMIZED LIST OF THE CLAIMED SPECIAL DAMAGES; - A STATEMENT OF THE PRINCIPLES OF LAW INVOLVED IN THE CASE SUPPORTED BY THE CITATION OF APPROPRIATE AUTHORITY; - REQUEST FOR SPECIFIC JURY INSTRUCTIONS SUBJECT TO THE RIGHT OF COUNSEL TO SUPPLEMENT SUCH REQUESTS DURING THE TRIAL ON MATTERS THAT CANNOT REASONABLY BE ANTICIPATED. ALL DOCUMENTS AND EXHIBITS MUST BE MARKET FOR IDENTIFICATION PURPOSES AND SHARED WITH OPPOSING COUNSEL PRIOR TO TRIAL. A LIST OF ALL EXHIBITS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE COURT AND OPPOSING COUNSEL PRIOR TO TRIAL. A LIST OF ALL WITNESS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO OPPOSING COUNSEL AT LEAST 14 DAYS PRIOR TO TRIAL. NOTICE ISSUED
  12. TRIAL BY JURY SCHEDULED FOR 02/01/2023 AT 09:00 AM IS CANCELLED.
  13. ORDERED SEE JOURNAL. NOTICE ISSUED
  14. THE CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER IN THIS MATTER IS HEREBY MODIFIED AS FOLLOWS. DISCOVERY CUTOFF IS 8/30/22. PLAINTIFF'S EXPERT REPORT IS DUE BY 7/29/22. DEFENDANT'S EXPERT REPORT IS DUE BY 8/29/22. DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS TO BE FILED BY 9/27/22. BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO BE FILED BY 10/25/22. REPLY BRIEF TO BE FILED BY 11/7/22. FINAL PRETRIAL SET FOR 11/15/2022 AT 01:30 PM. ALL PARTIES AND CLAIM REPRESENTATIVES TO BE PRESENT. TRIAL BY JURY SET FOR 02/01/2023 AT 09:00 AM. COUNSEL FOR THE RESPECTIVE PARTIES SHALL FURNISH THE COURT WITH A TRIAL BRIEF AT LEAST 2 DAYS PRIOR TO THE DATE ASSIGNED FOR TRIAL. THESE BRIEFS SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING: - A SUCCINCT STATEMENT OF THE KIND OF ACTION; - A CLEAR STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES INVOLVED; - A SUMMARY OF THE FACTUAL SITUATION IN REGARD TO EACH CLAIM OR DEFENSE; - AN ITEMIZED LIST OF THE CLAIMED SPECIAL DAMAGES; - A STATEMENT OF THE PRINCIPLES OF LAW INVOLVED IN THE CASE SUPPORTED BY THE CITATION OF APPROPRIATE AUTHORITY; - REQUEST FOR SPECIFIC JURY INSTRUCTIONS SUBJECT TO THE RIGHT OF COUNSEL TO SUPPLEMENT SUCH REQUESTS DURING THE TRIAL ON MATTERS THAT CANNOT REASONABLY BE ANTICIPATED. ALL DOCUMENTS AND EXHIBITS MUST BE MARKET FOR IDENTIFICATION PURPOSES AND SHARED WITH OPPOSING COUNSEL PRIOR TO TRIAL. A LIST OF ALL EXHIBITS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE COURT AND OPPOSING COUNSEL PRIOR TO TRIAL. A LIST OF ALL WITNESS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO OPPOSING COUNSEL AT LEAST 14 DAYS PRIOR TO TRIAL. NOTICE ISSUED
  15. FINAL PRETRIAL SCHEDULED FOR 10/06/2022 AT 01:30 PM IS CANCELLED.
  16. TRIAL BY JURY SCHEDULED FOR 12/12/2022 AT 09:00 AM IS CANCELLED.
  17. MOTION FILED FOR P1 EUGENE LITVAK RICHARD C HABER 0046788 JOINT MOTION TO AMEND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER 06/21/2022 - GRANTED
  18. MOTION FILED FOR P1 EUGENE LITVAK RICHARD C HABER 0046788 JOINT MOTION TO FOR ENTRY OF STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 06/21/2022 - GRANTED
  19. TELEPHONE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE HELD ON 3/10/22 WITH ALL PARTIES IN ATTENDANCE. ALL DISCOVERY TO BE COMPLETED BY JUNE 30, 2022. PLAINTIFF'S EXPERT REPORT IS DUE BY JUNE 30, 2022. DEFENDANTS' EXPERT REPORT IS DUE BY JULY 29, 2022. DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS TO BE FILED BY JULY 29, 2022. BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO BE FILED BY AUGUST 26, 2022. REPLY BRIEF TO BE FILED BY SEPTEMBER 7, 2022. FINAL PRETRIAL SET FOR 10/06/2022 AT 01:30 PM. ALL PARTIES AND CLAIM REPRESENTATIVES TO BE PHYSICALLY PRESENT. TRIAL BY JURY SET FOR 12/12/2022 AT 09:00 AM. COUNSEL FOR THE RESPECTIVE PARTIES FURNISH THE COURT WITH A TRIAL BRIEF AT LEAST 2 DAYS PRIOR TO THE DATE ASSIGNED FOR TRIAL. THESE BRIEFS SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING: - A SUCCINCT STATEMENT OF THE KIND OF ACTION; - A CLEAR STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES INVOLVED; - A SUMMARY OF THE FACTUAL SITUATION IN REGARD TO EACH CLAIM OR DEFENSE; - AN ITEMIZED LIST OF THE CLAIMED SPECIAL DAMAGES; - A STATEMENT OF THE PRINCIPLES OF LAW INVOLVED IN THE CASE SUPPORTED BY THE CITATION OF APPROPRIATE AUTHORITY; - REQUEST FOR SPECIFIC JURY INSTRUCTIONS SUBJECT TO THE RIGHT OF COUNSEL TO SUPPLEMENT SUCH REQUESTS DURING THE TRIAL ON MATTERS THAT CANNOT REASONABLY BE ANTICIPATED. ALL DOCUMENTS AND EXHIBITS MUST BE MARKET FOR IDENTIFICATION PURPOSES AND SHARED WITH OPPOSING COUNSEL PRIOR TO TRIAL. A LIST OF ALL EXHIBITS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE COURT AND OPPOSING COUNSEL PRIOR TO TRIAL. A LIST OF ALL WITNESS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO OPPOSING COUNSEL AT LEAST 14 DAYS PRIOR TO TRIAL. NOTICE ISSUED
  20. TELEPHONE CASE MANAGEMENT CONF SET FOR 03/10/2022 AT 10:30 AM. COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF TO INITIATE CONFERENCE CALL WITH ALL PARTIES AND THEN CONTACT THE COURT AT 216-443-8612. NOTICE ISSUED
  21. ANSWER FILED BY DEFENDANT(S) WINNCOM TECHNOLOGIES CORP.(D1) and AARON SAVY(D2) ATTORNEY LAUREN M. DRABIC 0097448 ANSWER OF DEFENDANTS WINNCOM TECHNOLOGIES CORP. AND AARON SAVY TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
  22. USPS RECEIPT NO. 46568412 DELIVERED BY USPS 01/31/2022 SAVY/AARON/ PROCESSED BY COC 02/09/2022.
  23. USPS RECEIPT NO. 46569622 DELIVERED BY USPS 01/31/2022 WINNCOM TECHNOLOGIES CORP. PROCESSED BY COC 02/09/2022.
  24. SUMS COMPLAINT(46569622) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: WINNCOM TECHNOLOGIES CORP. C/O BDB AGENT CO. 3800 EMBASSY PARKWAY AKRON, OH 44333-0000
  25. SUMS COMPLAINT(46568412) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: AARON SAVY 6585 HYLLWYND CIRCLE SOLON, OH 44139-0000
  26. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  27. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  28. WAIVER OF SER. OF SUM. REQUEST(46576850) SENT BY PLAINTIFF. TO: AARON SAVY CO WINNCOMM TECHNOLOGIES CORP. 28900 FOUNTAIN PARKWAY, SUITE B SOLON, OH 44139
  29. WAIVER OF SER. OF SUM. REQUEST(46576849) SENT BY PLAINTIFF. TO: WINNCOM TECHNOLOGIES CORP. 28900 FOUNTAIN PARKWAY, SUITE B SOLON, OH 44139
  30. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  31. WRIT FEE
  32. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  33. WRIT FEE
  34. REQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED INSTRUCTIONS FOR SERVICE (CERTIFIED MAIL) OF AARON SAVY
  35. REQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED INSTRUCTIONS FOR SERVICE (CERTIFIED MAIL
  36. JUDGE KENNETH R CALLAHAN ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  37. LEGAL RESEARCH
  38. LEGAL NEWS
  39. LEGAL AID
  40. COURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  41. COMPUTER FEE
  42. CLERK'S FEE
  43. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID RICHARD C HABER

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more