Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-01-27
Status INACTIVE
Type Tax Foreclosure
Docket 49 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Treasurer Of Cuyahoga County, Oh
Defendant Arthur A. Petsche|Kathy Morgan|City Of Cleveland, Department Of Building And Housing|Unknown Heirs, Devisees, Legatees, Assignees, Executors, Administrators And Legal Representatives Of Arthur A. Petsche|Unknown Heirs, Devisees, Legatees, Assignees, Executors, Administrators And Legal Representatives Of Kathy Morgan|Jim Cowger|Linda Morgan|Jack Morgan|Clint Morgan|Richard Morgan|William Morgan
Photo of Hon. Mark R Majer

Judge

Hon. Mark R Majer

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED: COMPLAINT W PRELIMINARY JUDICIAL REPORT
  2. REGULAR MAIL SERVICE RECEIPT NO. 48698242 RETURNED 10/12/2022 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT PETSCHE/ARTHUR /A. ATTEMPTED NOT KNOWN NOTICE MAILED TO PLTFS ATTORNEY. $0.00
  3. LEGAL NEWS ABSTRACT
  4. PROOF OF PUBLICATION FILED - LEGAL NEWS FEE $673.2
  5. JUDGMENT ENTRY(48698243) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: KATHY MORGAN 3242 E 57TH STREET CLEVELAND, OH 44127
  6. JUDGMENT ENTRY(48698242) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: ARTHUR A. PETSCHE 3242 E 57TH STREET CLEVELAND, OH 44127
  7. JUDGMENT ENTRY(48698241) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: JIM COWGER [email protected]
  8. JUDGMENT ENTRY(48698240) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: JUDITH MILES [email protected]
  9. JUDGMENT ENTRY(48698239) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: JUDITH MILES [email protected]
  10. JUDGMENT ENTRY(48698238) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: RICHARD BERTOVICH [email protected]
  11. JUDGMENT ENTRY(48698237) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: RICHARD BERTOVICH [email protected]
  12. A REVIEW OF THE DOCKET REVEALS THAT ON 9/20/22, THE COURT NOTED THAT ON 9/3/22, PLAINTIFF HAD BEEN ORDERED TO PERFECT SERVICE OF ITS SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT WITHIN THE UNEXPIRED TIME PERIOD TO PERFECT SERVICE OF THE ORIGINAL COMPLAINT, AS AFFORDED IT BY THE COURT'S 8/4/22 ORDER, BUT FAILED TO DO SO. THE COURT THEN ORDERED PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE, WITHIN SEVEN (7) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THE ORDER, AS TO WHY ITS COMPLAINT SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR ITS FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE COURT'S 9/3/22 ORDER. AS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, PLAINTIFF FAILED TO COMPLY WITH THE COURT'S 9/20/22 ORDER. PURSUANT TO THE COURT'S 9/20/22 ORDER, THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (FINAL). COURT COST ASSESSED TO THE PLAINTIFF(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  13. USPS RECEIPT NO. 48514049 DELIVERED BY USPS 09/13/2022 COWGER/JIM/ PROCESSED BY COC 09/21/2022.
  14. A REVIEW OF THE DOCKET REVEALS THAT ON 9/3/22, THE COURT ORDERED PLAINTIFF TO PERFECT SERVICE OF ITS SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT WITHIN THE UNEXPIRED TIME PERIOD TO PERFECT SERVICE OF THE ORIGINAL COMPLAINT, AS AFFORDED IT BY THE COURT'S 8/4/22 ORDER. AS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, PLAINTIFF FAILED TO COMPLY WITH THE COURT'S 9/3/22 ORDER. PLAINTIFF IS ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, WITHIN SEVEN (7) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, AS TO WHY ITS COMPLAINT SHOULD BE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR ITS FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE COURT'S 9/3/22 ORDER. PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE MUST BE FILED AND DOCKETED WITH THE CLERK OF COURT. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  15. AFFIDAVIT SERVICE BY PUBLICATION, FORECLOSURE $250 AFFIDAVIT FOR SERVICE BY PUBLICATION
  16. SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT(48514049) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: JIM COWGER 7505 FORT WILKINS DR. LAS VEGAS, NV 89129-0000
  17. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  18. WRIT FEE
  19. REQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED INSTRUCTIONS FOR SERVICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT
  20. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT INSTANTER IS GRANTED. THE SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT ATTACHED TO THE MOTION IS DEEMED FILED AS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. PLAINTIFF IS ORDERED TO PERFECT SERVICE OF ITS SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT WITHIN THE TIME FRAME AFFORDED TO PLAINTIFF FOR PERFECTION OF SERVICE OF ITS ORIGINAL COMPLAINT BY THE COURT 8/4/22 ORDER. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  21. MOTION FILED FOR P1 TREASURER OF CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OH JUDITH MILES 0081006 MOTION TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT 09/02/2022 - GRANTED
  22. AFTER REVIEWING PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO SHOW CAUSE ORDER OF JULY 28, 2022, AND THE RECORD OF THIS CASE, PLAINTIFF IS ORDERED TO PERFECT SERVICE ON ANY CURRENTLY-UNSERVED DEFENDANTS WITHIN FORTY-FIVE (45) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE. THE COURT WILL NOT ENTERTAIN ANY MOTIONS SEEKING EXTENSIONS OF TIME TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER. NOTICE ISSUED
  23. NOTICE FILED BY P1 TREASURER OF CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OH ATTORNEY JUDITH MILES 0081006 RESPONSE TO SHOW CAUSE ORDER
  24. A REVIEW OF THE DOCKET REVEALS THAT ON 1/31/22, THE COURT ORDERED PLAINTIFF TO PERFECT SERVICE OF ITS COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 4(E) OR THE COMPLAINT WOULD BE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. AS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, PLAINTIFF FAILED TO COMPLY WITH CIV.R. 4(E) AND THE COURT'S 1/31/22 ORDER. SPECIFICALLY, PLAINTIFF FAILED TO PERFECT SERVICE ON DEFENDANTS KATHY MORGAN AND ARTHUR A. PETSCHE. PLAINTIFF IS ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, WITHIN SEVEN (7) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, AS TO WHY ITS COMPLAINT SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR PLAINTIFF'S FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CIV.R. 4(E) AND THE COURT'S 1/31/22 ORDER. PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE MUST BE FILED AND DOCKETED WITH THE CLERK OF COURT (SIMPLY REQUESTING NEW SERVICE, WITHOUT OBTAINING LEAVE OF COURT, WILL RESULT IN THE QUASHING OF ANY NEW SERVICE ATTEMPTS AND DISMISSAL OF THE COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE). FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  25. ANSWER FILED BY D3 CITY OF CLEVELAND, DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND HOUSING ATTORNEY RICHARD BERTOVICH 0059434 DEFENDANT CITY OF CLEVELAND DISCLAIMING INTEREST
  26. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 46608362 RETURNED 02/24/2022 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT MORGAN/KATHY / - NOT DELIVRBL AS ADDR NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  27. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 46608362 RETURNED 2/24/2022 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT MORGAN/KATHY / - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  28. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 46608361 RETURNED 02/16/2022 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT PETSCHE/ARTHUR /A. - VACANT NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  29. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 46608361 RETURNED 2/16/2022 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT PETSCHE/ARTHUR /A. - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  30. USPS RECEIPT NO. 46608363 DELIVERED BY USPS 02/07/2022 CITY OF CLEVELAND, DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND HOUSING PROCESSED BY COC 02/16/2022.
  31. SUMS COMPLAINT(46608363) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: CITY OF CLEVELAND, DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND HOUSING 601 LAKESIDE AVENUE, RM. 505 CLEVELAND, OH 44114
  32. SUMS COMPLAINT(46608362) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: KATHY MORGAN 3242 E 57TH STREET CLEVELAND, OH 44127
  33. SUMS COMPLAINT(46608361) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: ARTHUR A. PETSCHE 3242 E 57TH STREET CLEVELAND, OH 44127
  34. A REVIEW OF THE DOCKET REVEALS PLAINTIFF FILED A COMPLAINT ON 1/27/22, ALTHOUGH SERVICE HAS NOT YET BEEN PERFECTED. PLAINTIFF IS ORDERED TO PERFECT SERVICE PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 4(E), OR THE PLEADING WILL BE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  35. MAGISTRATE CHRISTOPHER DAY ASSIGNED (MANUALLY)
  36. IT IS ORDERED BY THE COURT THAT THIS CAUSE BE REFERRED TO THE COURT MAGISTRATE TO TRY THE ISSUES OF LAW AND FACT ARISING THEREIN AND REPORT WITHOUT UNNECESSARY DELAY. NOTICE ISSUED
  37. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  38. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  39. WRIT FEE
  40. WRIT FEE
  41. WRIT FEE
  42. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  43. JUDGE MARK R MAJER ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  44. LEGAL RESEARCH
  45. LEGAL AID
  46. COMPUTER FEE
  47. CLERK'S FEE
  48. LEGAL NEWS
  49. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID JUDITH MILES Draw Down Account 00DD01DR

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more