Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Fresno County

Court

Fresno County

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-10-19
Status Judgment
Type 47 Small Claims $1,501 $5,000
Docket 25 entries
Disposition satisfaction of judgment

Parties

Plaintiff Dennis Reyna, Mick Michael, I|View Document 10/19/23 's Claim Filed
Defendant Henderson, Kaitlyn
Photo of Hon. Skiles Jon M

Judge

Hon. Skiles Jon M

Fresno County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. Clerk's Certificate of Mailing View Document Clerk's Certificate of Mailing Comment I certify that I am not a party to this cause and a true copy of the (Order to Dispose of Exhibits Introduced or Filed in the Civil Case and Remaining in Possession of the Exhibit Clerk) was placed in a sealed envelope and placed for collection and mailing on the date and at the place shown below following our ordinary business practice. I am readily familiar with this court's practice for collection and processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service with postage fully prepaid. Place of Mailing: Fresno, California on () . Parties served: Mick Michael Dennis Reyna I, Kaitlyn Henderson
  2. Cause Of Action Action Plaintiff's Claim File Date
  3. Amended Document Filed View Document Amended Document Filed Comment Updated plaintiff's address and phone number, removed attached pictures
  4. Request Filed View Document Amended Document Filed Comment 1st continuance from efile
  5. Notice of Exhibits Submitted to Court Prior to Trial Comment Hearing Date: Time: 1:30 PM Department: 97E
  6. Proof of Service View Document Proof of Service
  7. Plaintiff's Claim and Order SC Served Comment Fee: $75.00
  8. Notice of Remote Appearance. View Document Notice of Remote Appearance. Comment Party: Dennis Reyna, Mick Michael, I Type of Appearance Requested: CourtCall
  9. Notice of Exhibits Submitted to Court Prior to Trial Comment Hearing Date: Time: 1:30 PM Department: 97E
  10. Order Regarding Remote Appearance Granted View Document Order Regarding Remote Appearance Granted Judicial Officer Mangano, Robert Comment Party: Henderson, Kaitlyn Type of Appearance Requested: CourtCall
  11. Notice of Order on Remote Appearance Comment Mailed to: Kaitlyn Henderson
  12. Court Trial Original Type Court Trial Judicial Officer Judge, Pro Tempore Hearing Time 1:30 PM Result Heard Parties Present Plaintiff: Dennis Reyna, Mick Michael, I Defendant: Henderson, Kaitlyn
  13. Minute Order Attachment View Document - Minute Order Attachment
  14. Appeared in Person
  15. Remote Appearance Via Courtcall
  16. NON-Stipulation to Judge Pro Tem or Commissioners Comment NON-Stipulation to Judge Pro Tem or Commissioners
  17. Notice of Exhibits Submitted to Court Prior to Trial Comment Hearing Date: Time: 8:30 AM Department: 404 **2 envelopes handed to Management on 1/26/24
  18. Court Trial Original Type Court Trial Judicial Officer Whalen, Robert Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Heard
  19. Minute Order Attachment View Document 02.28.24 Minute Order
  20. Appeared in Person
  21. Notice of Entry of Judgment Mailed to All Parties
  22. Satisfaction of Judgment in Full filed View Document Satisfaction of Judgment in Full filed
  23. Notice to Dispose Exhibits Sent View Document Notice to Dispose Exhibits Sent Comment Recipient: Mick Michael Dennis Reyna I, Kaitlyn Henderson
  24. Chambers Work - Post Original Type Chambers Work - Post Judicial Officer Skiles, Jon M Hearing Time 5:30 PM Result Heard
  25. Order to Dispose Exhibits Signed and Filed View Document Order Received for Signature Comment Judge: J. Skiles

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more