Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Fairfield County

Court

Fairfield County

Connecticut

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-11-13
Type T 61 Torts Animals Dog
Docket 51 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Lynn Dudas
Defendant Galina Seriakovo|Anna Kovtunenko|Removed|Gregory Schmitt|Megan Easley

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. SUMMONS
  2. COMPLAINT
  3. APPEARANCE Appearance
  4. APPEARANCE Appearance
  5. APPEARANCE Appearance
  6. RETURN OF SERVICE
  7. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD Seriakova - MET to Answer Complaint RESULT: Granted 12/11/2023 HON WILLIAM CLARK
  8. ORDER RESULT: Granted 12/11/2023 HON WILLIAM CLARK
  9. NOTICE Seriakova Notice of I&Ps to the Plts
  10. NOTICE Seriakova Notice of I&Ps to Schmitt
  11. NOTICE Seriakova Notice of I&Ps to Easley
  12. MOTION TO DISMISS PB 10-30 and Memorandum of Law in Support RESULT: Order 5/20/2024 HON WILLIAM CLARK
  13. ORDER RESULT: Order 5/20/2024 HON WILLIAM CLARK
  14. OBJECTION TO MOTION to dismiss
  15. REPLY to Objection to Motion to Dismiss
  16. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT and Memorandum of Law in Support
  17. ORDER RESULT: Order 5/20/2024 HON WILLIAM CLARK
  18. EXHIBITS A to Mt for Summary Judgment #108.00
  19. EXHIBITS B to Mt for Summary Judgment #108.00
  20. EXHIBITS C to Mt for Summary Judgment #108.00
  21. EXHIBITS D
  22. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME to respond to Motion for Summary Judgment RESULT: Order 1/23/2024 HON WILLIAM CLARK
  23. ORDER RESULT: Order 1/23/2024 HON WILLIAM CLARK
  24. REQUEST TO REVISE
  25. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE DISCOVERY MOTION OR REQUEST PB CH13 RESULT: Granted 2/26/2024 HON WILLIAM CLARK
  26. ORDER RESULT: Granted 2/26/2024 HON WILLIAM CLARK
  27. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME to respond to Motion for Summary Judgment RESULT: Granted 3/25/2024 HON WILLIAM CLARK
  28. ORDER RESULT: Granted 3/25/2024 HON WILLIAM CLARK
  29. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD RESULT: Granted 3/25/2024 HON WILLIAM CLARK
  30. ORDER RESULT: Granted 3/25/2024 HON WILLIAM CLARK
  31. NOTICE Notice of Service of Discovery as to L. Dudas
  32. NOTICE Notice of Service of Discovery as to A. Kovtunenko
  33. NOTICE Notice of Service of Discovery as to G.Seriakovo
  34. NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE re Defendants Gregory Schmidt and Megan Easley
  35. OBJECTION to Second Mt for Extension of Time to Respond to Motion for Summary Judgment
  36. MOTION FOR ORDER Defendant Seriakova's Motion to Compel Amended Complaint
  37. MOTION FOR ORDER OF COMPLIANCE – PB SEC 13-14 (INTERR/PROD – 13-6/13-9)
  38. NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE
  39. AMENDED COMPLAINT and Revised
  40. NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE As to the Defendant, Anna Kovtunenko
  41. ANSWER
  42. CLAIM FOR JURY OF 6
  43. WITHDRAWAL OF ACTION AGAINST PARTICULAR DEFENDANT(S) – CASE REMAINS PENDING
  44. ANSWER TO AMENDED COMPLAINT Defendant Seriakova's Answer to Amended/Revised Complaint
  45. CERTIFICATE OF CLOSED PLEADINGS AND CLAIM FOR TRIAL LIST
  46. NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE
  47. CHEDULING ORDER BY AGREEMENT C50,T02,T03,T11,T12,T61,V01,V04, V09 CASES
  48. ISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESS Medical Providers
  49. OTION FOR CONTINUANCE
  50. OTION FOR CONTINUANCE Status Conf. RESULT: Granted 3/21/2025 HON THOMAS WELCH
  51. RDER RESULT: Granted 3/21/2025 HON THOMAS WELCH

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more