Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Oklahoma unified county

Court

Oklahoma unified county

Oklahoma

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-05-23
Type Dissolution Of Marriage
Docket 50 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Mcintyrekristyr,
Defendant Mcintyrevictor,
Photo of Hon. BEARE, MINDY M.

Judge

Hon. BEARE, MINDY M.

Pittsburg County (OK)

Oklahoma

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  2. F&E PETITION
  3. LENGTHY TRIAL FUND
  4. COURTHOUSE SECURITY FEE
  5. 10% OF CHSC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  6. STATE JUDICIAL REV. FUND INTERPRETER & TRANSLATOR SERVICES
  7. 15% TO DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND
  8. COURT CLERK PRESERVATION FUND
  9. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE AND WAIVER OF SUMMONS
  10. KONSURE LAW FIRM'S ENTRY OF APPEARANCE AND REQUEST FOR
  11. NOTICES FOR RESPONDENT, VICTOR MCINTYRE
  12. REVOCATION OF RESPONDENT'S "WAIVER OF NOTICE"
  13. ORDER OF CONSOLIDATION: THE COURT FINDS THAT THE
  14. PARTIES HAVE A PENDING DIVORCE CASE IN PITTSBURG CO.
  15. CASE NO. FD-23-103. THE COURT HEREBY CONSOLIDATES
  16. PO-23-228 W/ FD-23-103. PARTIES TO CONTACT JUDGE BEARE
  17. TO SET FURTHER HEARING. S/MILLS
  18. MOTION TO SET FOR TRIAL
  19. ORDER SETTING HEARING ON MOTION TO SET TRIAL, SET FOR
  20. 10-25-23 AT 1:30PM S/BEARE
  21. RESPONDENT'S OBJECTION TO PETITIONER'S MOTION TO SET
  22. FOR FINAL HEARING
  23. MINUTE ORDER DATED 10/25/23. COMES ON FOR: MOTION TO
  24. SET. RULING: STRICKEN TO BE RESET ONCE DISCOVERY IS
  25. COMPLETED. S/BEARE
  26. F&E NOTICE OF DEPOSITION
  27. F&E MOTION TO GRANT DISSOLUTION AND SEVER JOINT TENANCY WHILE RESERVING JURISDICTION AS TO THE PROPERTY DIVISION
  28. F&E ORDER SETTING HEARING. MATTER SET FOR MARCH 13, 2024 AT 1:30 P.M. S/BEARE
  29. NOTICE OF SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM TO PRODUCE AND PERMIT INSPECTION AND COPYING OF DOCUMENTS
  30. RESPONDENT'S OBJECTION TO PETITIONER'S, MOTION TO GRANT DISSOLUTION AND SEVER JOINT TENANCY WHILE RESERVING JURISDICTION AS TO THE PROPERTY DIVISON.
  31. F&E CT. MIN. COMES ON FOR: STATUS. PETITIONER'S MOTION TO GRANT DISSOLUTION AND SEVER JOINT TENENCY WHILE RESERVING JURISDICTION AS TO PROPERTY DIVISION IS DENIED. MATTER IS SET FOR PRE-TRIAL APRIL 24, 2024, AT 1:30 P.M. S/BEARE
  32. F&E CT. MIN. COMES ON FOR: PRE-TRIAL. RULING: PRE-TRIAL CONTINUED TO JUNE 12, 2024, AT 1:30 P.M. FINAL HEARING SET FOR JUNE 25, 2024, AT 1:30 P.M. S/BEARE
  33. F&E NOTICE OF DEPOSITION
  34. F&E CERTIFICATE OF HAND DELIVERY OF RESPONDENT'S RESPONSE TO PETITIONER'S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES AND REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMETS TO RESPONDENT
  35. F&E CT. MIN. COMES ON FOR: PRE-TRIAL. RULING: COUNSEL ANNOUNCE THERE ARE NO PRE-TRIAL ISSUES. S/BEARE
  36. F&E NOTICE OF SUBPOENA (JOHN ROSS)
  37. F&E NOTICE OF SUPBOENA (TRAVIS KANARD)
  38. F&E NOTICE OF SUBPOENA (HEATH MARCO)
  39. F&E NOTICE OF SUBPOENA (DARRA COWART)
  40. F&E CT. MIN. COMES ON FOR: FINAL HEARING. RULING: 1) RESPONDENT IS AWARDED THE REAL PROPERTY IN DISPUTE AND IS TO PAY THE PETITIONER ONE-HALF OF THE VALUE. THE VALUE ASSIGNED THE PROPERTY IS $35,000.00 PURSUANT TO PETITIONER'S EXHIBIT 1. 2) COUNSEL IS TO PLAN FOR THE EXCHANGE OF THE ITEMS OF PROPERTY PETITIONER WANTS RETURNED TO HER, HOWEVER A MORE DETAILED LIST NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED TO RESPONDENT'S COUNSEL. 3) BOTH PARTIES ARE ORDERED TO DESTROY ANY PICTURES/VIDEOS THEY MAY HAVE OF THE OTHER PARTY THAT ARE SENSITIVE IN NATURE. 4) WHILE O-23-228 IS BEING DISMISSED, THERE SHOULD BE LANGUAGE FOR A MUTUAL RESTRAINING ORDER INCLUDED IN THE DECREE. 5) PETITIONER IS RESTORED TO HER PREVIOUS NAME. 6) PARTIES ARE GRANTED A DIVORXCE THIS DATE. 7) MR. FORAKER IS TO PREPARE AND SUBMIT THE JOURNAL ENTRY. MATTER
  41. F&E 7/17/24 CT. MIN. COMES ON FOR: STATUS OF ORDER. RULING: CONTINUED TO JULY 24, 2024 AT 1:30 P.M. S/BEARE
  42. F&E CT. MIN. COMES ON FOR: STATUS OF ORDER (FROM 6/26/24). RULING: CONTINUED BY AGREEMENT TO AUGUST 7, 2024, AT 1:30 P.M. S/BEARE
  43. F&E DECREE OF DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE. S/BEARE
  44. F&E CT. MIN. COMES ON FOR: STATUS OF ORDER (FROM 6/26/24). RULING: STRICKEN AS MOOT, ORDER HAS BEEN APPROVED. S/BEARE

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more