Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Palm Beach Co

Court

Palm Beach Co

Florida

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-06-01
Status Open
Type Legal Malpractice
Docket 170 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Klayman, Larry|Klayman, Larry|Illoominate Media Llc,|Loomer, Laura
Defendant Coleman, Ronald|Dhillon Law Group Inc,|Mandelbaum Barrett Pc,|Young, Craig William
Photo of Hon. Sherman, James W

Judge

Hon. Sherman, James W

Palm Beach County (FL)

Florida

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CIVIL COVER SHEET
  2. COMPLAINT
  3. DIVISION ASSIGNMENT
  4. PAID $401.00 ON RECEIPT 4919334
  5. SUMMONS ISSUED
  6. SUMMONS ISSUED
  7. SUMMONS ISSUED
  8. SUMMONS ISSUED
  9. PAID $40.00 ON RECEIPT 4931897
  10. NOTICE OF APPEARANCE CIVIL
  11. NOTICE OF APPEARANCE CIVIL
  12. NOTICE OF APPEARANCE CIVIL
  13. MOTION TO DISMISS
  14. NOTICE OF APPEARANCE CIVIL
  15. MOTION TO DISMISS
  16. MOTION TO DISMISS
  17. ORDER SETTING HEARING
  18. REQUEST TO PRODUCE
  19. REQUEST TO PRODUCE
  20. MOTION TO COMPEL
  21. NOTICE OF HEARING
  22. NOTICE THE DEFENDANT, DHILLON LAW GROUP, INC'S, PRIVILEGE LOG
  23. RESPONSE TO REQ TO PRODUCE
  24. RESPONSE TO REQ TO PRODUCE
  25. ESPONSE TO REQ TO PRODUCE
  26. ESPONSE TO REQ TO PRODUCE
  27. ESPONSE TO REQ TO PRODUCE
  28. ESPONSE TO: AND OBJECTIONS TO THE PLT'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO THE DFT F/B DFT CRAIG WILLIAM YOUNG
  29. ESPONSE TO: AND OBJECTIONS TO THE PLT'S SECOND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO THE DFT F/B DFT CRAIG WILLIAM YOUNG
  30. CM DESIGNATION TO THE GENERAL TRACK WITH JURY TRIAL ORDER
  31. RDER RESETTING
  32. OTICE OF FILING INTERROGS
  33. EQUEST TO PRODUCE
  34. ESPONSE TO: IN OPPOSITION TO DTS RONALD COLEMAN AND MANDELBAUM BARRETT PCS MOTION TO COMPEL IN PERSON DEPOSITION DATES FROM PLT F/B PLTS
  35. EQUEST TO PRODUCE
  36. OTICE OF FILING INTERROGS
  37. OTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION
  38. OTICE OF CANCELLATION
  39. OTICE OF SERVICE NOTICE OF SERVING PROPOSALS FOR SETTLEMENT
  40. EQUEST FOR COPIES
  41. OTICE OF HEARING
  42. OTICE OF CANCELLATION
  43. E-NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION
  44. OTICE OF FILING INTERROGS
  45. EQUEST TO PRODUCE
  46. EQUEST FOR COPIES
  47. OTION TO COMPEL
  48. OTION DEFENDANTS', RONALD COLEMAN AND MANDELBAUM BARRETT P.C., MOTION FOR STATUS CONFERENCE
  49. OTICE OF HEARING
  50. E-NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION
  51. OTION TO COMPEL
  52. OTICE OF HEARING
  53. OTION TO COMPEL
  54. OTICE OF CANCELLATION
  55. RDER SETTING HEARING
  56. E-NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION
  57. OTICE OF CANCELLATION
  58. OMPLAINT
  59. OTION TO DISMISS
  60. OTICE OF HEARING
  61. OTION TO STRIKE
  62. OTICE OF HEARING
  63. ESPONSE TO: IN OPPOSITION TO PLTS MOTION TO STRIKE SPECIAL SET HEARING F/B DFTS RONALD COLEMAN AND MANDELBAUM BARRETT PC
  64. OTICE OF HEARING
  65. OTION TO COMPEL
  66. OTICE OF HEARING
  67. OTICE OF HEARING
  68. RDER SETTING HEARING
  69. RDER GRANTING J SHERMAN DTD. 2/28/24 MOTION TO COMPEL BETTER RESPONSES TO INTERROGATORIES
  70. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
  71. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
  72. RANSCRIPT
  73. ESPONSE TO: IN OPPOSITION TO PLTS AMENDED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME F/B DFTS RONALD COLEMAN AND MANDELBAUM BARRETT P.C.
  74. RDER GRANTING JUDGE SHERMAN DOD 3/6/24 MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND: GRANTED.
  75. EQUEST TO PRODUCE
  76. EQUEST TO PRODUCE
  77. OTICE OF FILING INTERROGS
  78. ESPONSE TO: IN OPPOSITION TO DFTS RONALD COLEMAN AND MANDELBAUM BARRETT, P.C.'S MOT TO DISMISS. F/B PLT
  79. RDER GRANTING J. SHERMAN DTD 3/15/24: MOTIONS TO DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT IS GRANTED AS TO COUNT VI FOR FRAUDULENT INDUCEMENT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. THE MOTION IS GRANTED AS TO COUNT VIII FOR UNJUST ENRICHMENT AGAINST MANDELBAUM BARRETT PC AND RONALD COLEMAN WITH PREJUDICE AS THE PARTIES’ RELATIONSHIP ARE GOVERNED BY THE TERMS OF A WRITTEN AGREEMENT CONTAINED IN EXHIBIT A TO THE AMENDED COMPLAINT. **SEE ORD FOR DETAILS**
  80. OTION DEFENDANTS' JOINT MOTION
  81. OTICE OF HEARING
  82. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
  83. OTICE OF HEARING
  84. OTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION
  85. OTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION
  86. OTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
  87. OTICE OF HEARING
  88. ESPONSE TO: IN OPPOSITION TO (1) DFTS' JOINT MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION OF ORDER GRANTING DFT'S MOTION TO DISMISS; (2) DFTS RONALD COLEMAN AND MANDELBAUM BARRETT PC MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT; AND (3) DFTS RONALD COLEMAN AND MANDELBAUM BARRETT PC'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER EXCUSING DFTS FROM APPEARING AT THE 5/14/24 AND 5/16/24 DEPOSITIONS F/B PLTS LAURA LOOMER AND ILLOOMINATE MEDIA LLC
  89. OTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION
  90. OTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION
  91. OTICE NOTICE OF RESOLUTION
  92. EMORANDUM
  93. ESPONSE TO: DFTS RONALD COLEMAN AND MANDELBAUM BARRETT P.C.'S NOTICE OF RELIANCE ON PRIOR AUTHORITY AND ARGUMENT AND MOTION TO STRIKE F/B PLTS
  94. OTICE DEFENDANTS,' RONALD COLEMAN AND MANDELBAUM BARRETT, P.C., NOTICE OF RELIANCE ON PRIOR AUTHORITY AND ARGUMENT
  95. RDER DENYING SHERMAN DTD 5/30/24: MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION OF COURT'S RULING ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS DENIED MOTION TO DISMISS AS TO THE REMAINING COUNTS AND DFTS DENIED
  96. NSWER & AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
  97. NSWER & AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
  98. NSWER & AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
  99. OTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION
  100. RDER SHERMAN DTD 7/9/24: PARTIES SHALL APPEAR AT UMC BEFORE 7/15/24 W/IN 24 HOURS NOTICE TO THE COURT AND ARGUE THE MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
  101. OTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
  102. ESPONSE TO: DFTS CRAIG YOUNG'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER F/B PLTS
  103. RDER SETTING HEARING
  104. EQUEST TO PRODUCE
  105. RDER GRANTING J SHERMAN DTD. 7/12/24 GRANTING MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER EXCUSING DEFT FROM APPEARING AT THE 7/15/24 DEPO IS GRANTED MOTION FOR SANCTIONS IS DENIED.
  106. ITNESS LIST
  107. ITNESS LIST
  108. ITNESS LIST
  109. ITNESS LIST
  110. ESPONSE TO REQ TO PRODUCE
  111. OTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION
  112. OTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  113. OTICE OF FILING
  114. OTICE THE DEFENDANT, DHILLON LAW GROUP INC.'S NOTICE OF ADOPTION AND JOINDER IN DEFENDANTS, RONALD COLEMAN AND MANDELBAUM BARRETT P.C.'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  115. ITNESS LIST
  116. OTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION
  117. OTICE OF INTENT
  118. OTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  119. OTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  120. OTICE OF FILING
  121. EQUEST FOR COPIES
  122. OTION PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO DECLARE UNENFORCEABLE AND ENJOIN ORDER OF MAGISTRATE BRUCE REINHART
  123. OTICE OF HEARING
  124. RDER J SHERMAN DTD. 9/26/14 CANCELLING 10/2/24 HEARING UMC
  125. MERGENCY MOTION
  126. OTICE THE DEFENDANT'S, DHILLON LAW GROUP, INC. NOTICE OF SERVING PROPOSAL FOR SETTLEMENT TO THE PLAINTIFF, ILLOOMINATE, LLC
  127. OTICE OF FILING INTERROGS
  128. RDER SETTING HEARING
  129. RDER SETTING HEARING
  130. ESPONSE TO: PLT'S EMERGENCY MOTION F/B DFT, CRAIGN WILLIAM YOUNG
  131. RDER DENYING SHERMAN; PLTF'S EMERGENCY MOTION TO DECLARE UNENFORCEABLE AND ENJOIONG ORDER OF MAGISTRATE BRUCE REINHART AND DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL IS DENIED DTD 10/7/2024
  132. OTION TO COMPEL
  133. OTICE OF HEARING
  134. OTICE (AMENDED) OPPOSITION TO CRAIG YOUNG'S MOTION TO COMPEL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND CROSS MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AND TO STAY FILED BY PLTS
  135. ESPONSE TO: OPPOSITION TO DFT CRAIG YOUNGS ON TO COMPEL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND CROSS MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AND TO STAY F/B PLTS
  136. OTICE DESIGNATION OF TRANSCRIPTS AND VIDEO F/B PLTS
  137. OTICE OF APPEARANCE CIVIL
  138. ESPONSE TO: IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS RONALD COLEMAN AND MANDELBAUM BARRETT, P.C.'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND CROSS MOTION SANCTIONS F/B PLTS
  139. ESPONSE TO: IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT CRAIG YOUNG'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND CROSS MOTION FOR SANCTIONS F/B PLTS
  140. ESPONSE TO: IN OPPOSITION TO DHILLON LAW GROUP'S' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND CROSS MOTION FOR SANCTIONS F/B PLTS
  141. OTION PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO ADD A CLAIM FOR PUNITIVE DAMAGES INTO AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH SUPPORTING MEMORANDUM OF LAW AND PROFFER OF EVIDENCE
  142. OTICE OF HEARING
  143. OTION TO STAY CONSIDERATION OF PURPORTED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT (SIC!) BY CRAIG YOUNG WITH NON-PARTY COUNCIL ON AMERICAN ISLAMIC RELATIONS F/B PLTS
  144. PPEALS CASE INACTIVE
  145. OTICE OF STATUS UPDATE ON THE APPEAL OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE BRUCE REINHART'S ORDER TO THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT F/B PLTS -UP
  146. OTICE OF HEARING
  147. RDER J. SHERMAN DTD 1/23/25: EXTENDING STAY FOR 15 DAY PERIOD.
  148. OTICE OF FILING
  149. RDER SETTING HEARING
  150. TATUS REPORT
  151. RDER J SHERMAN DTD 2/12/25 MOTION TO COMPEL IS GRANTED
  152. OTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL
  153. RDER SETTING HEARING
  154. OURT REPORTER APPEARANCE
  155. RANSCRIPT

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more