Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2023-05-23
Type Forfeit Property Seized
Docket 28 entries

Parties

Plaintiff State Of Oklahoma,
Defendant 2007 Ford Mustang Vin:, 1 Zvft 80 N 47525922 And $642.00, in Us Currency,
Photo of Hon. VACLAW, RUSSELL C

Judge

Hon. VACLAW, RUSSELL C

Nowata County (OK)

Oklahoma

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. OKLAHOMA COURT INFORMATION SYSTEM FEE - EFFECTIVE 07/01/04
  2. LENGTHY TRIAL FUND
  3. OK COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
  4. 10% OF CASA TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  5. OK COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
  6. 10% OF COJC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  7. COURTHOUSE SECURITY FEE
  8. 10% OF CHSC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  9. STATE JUDICIAL REV. FUND INTERPRETER & TRANSLATOR SERVICES
  10. 15% TO DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND
  11. COURT CLERK PRESERVATION FUND
  12. NOTICE OF SEIZURE AND FORFEITURE(JAD)
  13. NOTICE OF SEIZURE AND FORFEITURE RTD SERVED(JAD)
  14. ANSWER (SM)
  15. MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS ATTORNEY OF RECORD(JAD)
  16. ORDER AUTHORIZING WITHDRAWAL AS ATTORNEY OF RECORD(JAD)
  17. ORDER SETTING HEARING(PER WILL DRAKE THIS IS THE SAME DEFENDANT AS CJ-23-80.)
  18. SUBPOENA ISSUED TO SHF (2 NAMES)
  19. SUBPOENA RET'D SERVED;BRAXTON BOWERS, STEVEN LETTERMAN
  20. CM:VACLAW-ROWELL-STATE/PLTF BY ATTY W DRAKE-DEFT, T CONWAY, IN CUSTODY PRO SE-NO OTHER PARTIES APPEAR. TESTIMONY IS HEARD. DEFT OBJECTS TO PROPERTY BEING FORFEITED. STATE ADVISES THE COURT OF EMAILS FROM AN INTERESTED 3RD PARTY/VEHICLE OWNER, C JAMERSON. DEFT ADVISES MRS JAMERSON IS HIS SISTER, THE OWNER OF THE MERCEDES-BENZ IN THIS CASE, AND THAT SHE HAS JUST RECENTLY HAD SURGERY AND IS UNABLE TO APPEAR TODAY. DEFT ALSO STATES HE HAS HAD NO ACCESS TO A LAW LIBRARY. CRT FINDS THE DEFT SHOULD BE GRANTED USE OF THE LAW LIBRARY; AND ORDERS THE DEFT BACK 11/25/24 @ 9:00AM TO BE BROUGHT OVER TO HAVE ACCESS TO THE LAW LIBRARY FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS CASE. CRT FINDS THERE IS NO PROOF BEFORE THE COURT AT THIS TIME OF MRS JAMERSON'S SURGERY, THAT PROPER NOTICE WAS COMPLETED AND THE EMAILS EXCHANGED W/THE STATE IS NOT SUFFICIENT TO MAKE A CLAIM ON THE PROPERTY. CRT CONTINUES MATTER TO 12/10/24 @ 9:00AM TO ALLOW THE DEFT TIME TO PREPARE W/USE OF THE LAW LIBRARY, AND FOR MRS JAMERSON TO SUBMIT A PROPER CLAIM, OR APPEAR. (KM)
  21. CM:VACLAW-MATTHIESEN-PLTF BY ATTY W DRAKE-DEFT, T CONWAY, IN CUSTODY PRO SE. DEFT PRESENTS A MOTION TO QUASH; PARTIES FIND THE MOTION MORE PERTAINS TO CJ-23-80 (A SIMILAR CASE, THAT THE SAME DEFT IS INVOLVED IN). DEFT HAS NO OBJECTION TO THE PROPERTY BEING FORFEITED IN THIS CASE. CRT FINDS THE PLTF IS TO PRESENT AN AFFIDAVIT TO THE CRT; CRT GRANTS PLTF'S PETITION UPON RECEIPT OF AFFIDAVIT. (KM)
  22. MOTION TO SET FOR HEARING TO QUASH (KM) (COPY/ORIG CJ-23-80)
  23. MOTION TO SET HEARING TO QUASH (KM) (COPY/ORIG CJ-23-80)
  24. ORDER OF FORFEITURE
  25. AFFIDAVIT
  26. AMENDED ORDER OF FORFEITURE

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase