Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Middlesex County

Court

Middlesex County

Connecticut

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-11-03
Type V 90 Vehicular All Other
Docket 49 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Mark Gaudette
Defendant Shane Michael Fiala|Allison Palmieri|Fernando Palmieri

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. SUMMONS
  2. COMPLAINT
  3. APPEARANCE Appearance
  4. APPEARANCE Appearance
  5. RETURN OF SERVICE
  6. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD RESULT: Granted 11/28/2023 HON CYNTHIA SWIENTON
  7. ORDER RESULT: Granted 11/28/2023 HON CYNTHIA SWIENTON
  8. MOTION FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL INTERROGATORIES PB SEC 13-6(b) RESULT: Granted 11/28/2023 HON CYNTHIA SWIENTON
  9. ORDER RESULT: Granted 11/28/2023 HON CYNTHIA SWIENTON
  10. REQUEST TO REVISE
  11. EXHIBITS to Request to Revise
  12. SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT FOR APPORTIONMENT AS SERVED CGS SEC 52-102b
  13. OBJECTION TO REQUEST TO REVISE Plaintiff's Objection to Defendant's Entry No. 103.00 RESULT: Withdrawn 12/14/2023 BY THE PLAINTIFF
  14. WITHDRAWAL OF MOTION Withdrawal of 106.00 12/14/2023 OBJECTION TO REQUEST TO REVISE
  15. OBJECTION TO REQUEST TO REVISE Plaintiff's Objection to Defendant's Entry No. 103.00 - Replaces Entry No. 106.00 RESULT: Sustained 1/2/2024 HON RUPAL SHAH
  16. ORDER RESULT: Sustained 1/2/2024 HON RUPAL SHAH
  17. AMENDED COMPLAINT RE: Amended Complaint to assert causes of action against the apportionment defendant
  18. NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE To Defendants non standard I & P's
  19. SCHEDULING ORDER Joint Scheduling Order RESULT: Accepted 2/8/2024 HON RUPAL SHAH
  20. ORDER RESULT: Accepted 2/8/2024 HON RUPAL SHAH
  21. MOTION FOR DEFAULT-FAILURE TO PLEAD Re: Amended Complaint 109.00 Re: Defendant SHANE MICHAEL FIALA Only RESULT: Denied 2/22/2024 BY THE CLERK
  22. ORDER RESULT: Denied 2/22/2024 BY THE CLERK
  23. MOTION TO STRIKE by Fiala with Memorandum of Law RESULT: Denied 5/3/2024 HON RUPAL SHAH
  24. ORDER RESULT: Denied 5/3/2024 HON RUPAL SHAH
  25. EXHIBITS cases in support of Motion to Strike
  26. OBJECTION TO MOTION Plaintiff's objection to Defendant's Motion to Strike Dated February 21, 2024 Entry No. 113.00
  27. DISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESS Petty Details
  28. MOTION FOR DEFAULT -FAILURE TO APPEAR PB 17-20 Re: D02 & D03 Only RESULT: Denied 3/15/2024 BY THE CLERK
  29. ORDER RESULT: Denied 3/15/2024 BY THE CLERK
  30. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD as to Apportionment Complaint RESULT: Granted 4/8/2024 HON RUPAL SHAH
  31. ORDER RESULT: Granted 4/8/2024 HON RUPAL SHAH
  32. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD as to Amended Complaint RESULT: Granted 4/8/2024 HON RUPAL SHAH
  33. ORDER RESULT: Granted 4/8/2024 HON RUPAL SHAH
  34. MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE Re: 04/09/2024 3:15PM Remote Motion to Strike Hearing - Consent received RESULT: Granted 4/4/2024 HON RUPAL SHAH
  35. ORDER RESULT: Granted 4/4/2024 HON RUPAL SHAH
  36. MOTION TO STRIKE the Amended Complaint, filed by Palmieri Defendants RESULT: Denied 5/3/2024 HON RUPAL SHAH
  37. OBJECTION TO MOTION Plaintiff's Objection to Defendant's Motion to Strike Dated 04/15/2024 Entry No. 121.00
  38. OFFER OF COMPROMISE D01 only
  39. OFFER OF COMPROMISE D02 & D03 only
  40. CASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116) Re: 06/07/2024 11:00AM Remote Motion to Strike Hearing - Consent received RESULT: Granted 6/3/2024 HON RUPAL SHAH
  41. ORDER RESULT: Granted 6/3/2024 HON RUPAL SHAH
  42. ANSWER
  43. CLAIM FOR JURY OF 6
  44. ANSWER TO AMENDED COMPLAINT
  45. ANSWER TO APPORTIONMENT OF LIABILITY COMPLAINT - CGS SEC 52-102B
  46. CERTIFICATE OF CLOSED PLEADINGS AND CLAIM FOR TRIAL LIST
  47. NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE To Defendants 2nd non standard I & P's
  48. WITHDRAWAL OF ACTION
  49. WITHDRAWAL OF ACTION RESULT: BY THE PLAINTIFF

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more