Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Vermont Unified

Court

Vermont Unified

Vermont

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-03-01
Status Disposed
Type Environmental Appeal
Docket 38 entries

Docket Entries

  1. Sent to Case Parties Automated by RIS for SOP processing - Lawrence G. Slason, Harold B. Stevens III, Nathan Stearns, Peter G. Raymond
  2. Case Open
  3. Notice of Appeal Filed TC NOA Date: 03/01/2023
  4. Transmittal Form
  5. Case Number Assignment Notice
  6. Notice to Parties Recipients: Appellate Attorney Raymond, Peter G.; Appellate Attorney Slason, Lawrence G.; Appellate Attorney Stearns, Nathan; Appellate Attorney Stevens, Harold B. III
  7. Sent to Case Parties Automated by RIS for SOP processing - Lawrence G. Slason, Harold B. Stevens III, Nathan Stearns, Peter G. Raymond
  8. Appellant's Docketing Statement Filed by: Appellant Campbell, Laura; Appellate Attorney Stevens, Harold B. III
  9. Transcripts Not Needed
  10. Record Complete
  11. Notice to Parties Recipients: Appellate Attorney Raymond, Peter G.; Appellate Attorney Slason, Lawrence G.; Appellate Attorney Stearns, Nathan; Appellate Attorney Stevens, Harold B. III
  12. Appellee's Docketing Statement Filed by: Appellate Attorney Stearns, Nathan; Appellee Windham & Windsor Housing Trust
  13. Appellant's Brief Word Count: 2,946 Filed by: Appellant Campbell, Laura; Appellate Attorney Stevens, Harold B. III Word Count: 2,946
  14. Appellee's Brief Word Count: 5,926 Filed by: Appellate Attorney Raymond, Peter G.; Appellee Windham & Windsor Housing Trust Word Count: 5,926
  15. Sent to Case Parties Automated by RIS for SOP processing - Lawrence G. Slason, Harold B. Stevens III, Nathan Stearns, Peter G. Raymond
  16. Oral Argument Letter Request due 5/22/23
  17. Notice to Parties Recipients: Appellate Attorney Raymond, Peter G.; Appellate Attorney Slason, Lawrence G.; Appellate Attorney Stearns, Nathan; Appellate Attorney Stevens, Harold B. III
  18. Response to Oral Argument Letter Type Of Argument Requested: Oral Filed by: Appellant Campbell, Laura; Appellate Attorney Stevens, Harold B. III Type Of Argument Requested: Oral
  19. Appellant's Reply Brief Word Count: 153 Filed by: Appellant Campbell, Laura; Appellate Attorney Stevens, Harold B. III Word Count: 153
  20. To Be Argued Requested by: Appellate Attorney Stevens, Harold B. III
  21. Response to Oral Argument Letter with Attorney Dates of Unavailability Type Of Argument Requested: Oral Filed by: Appellate Attorney Raymond, Peter G.; Appellee Windham & Windsor Housing Trust with Attorney Dates of Unavailability Type Of Argument Requested: Oral
  22. Sent to Case Parties Automated by RIS for SOP processing - Lawrence G. Slason, Harold B. Stevens III, Nathan Stearns, Peter G. Raymond
  23. Calendar Sent to Parties
  24. Notice to Parties Recipients: Appellate Attorney Raymond, Peter G.; Appellate Attorney Slason, Lawrence G.; Appellate Attorney Stearns, Nathan; Appellate Attorney Stevens, Harold B. III
  25. Sent to Case Parties Automated by RIS for SOP processing - Lawrence G. Slason, Harold B. Stevens III, Nathan Stearns, Peter G. Raymond
  26. Calendar Sent to Parties Rescheduled from July 12, 2023
  27. Notice to Parties Recipients: Appellate Attorney Raymond, Peter G.; Appellate Attorney Slason, Lawrence G.; Appellate Attorney Stearns, Nathan; Appellate Attorney Stevens, Harold B. III
  28. Hearing Held Argued By: (AA) Atty H. Stevens; (AE) Atty P. Raymond Panel: HEE/KRC/WDC
  29. Sent to Case Parties Automated by RIS for SOP processing - Lawrence G. Slason, Harold B. Stevens III, Nathan Stearns, Peter G. Raymond
  30. Final Decision Panel Order Panel: HEE/KRC/WDC Mandate: Affirmed
  31. Notice to Parties Recipients: Appellate Attorney Raymond, Peter G.; Appellate Attorney Slason, Lawrence G.; Appellate Attorney Stearns, Nathan; Appellate Attorney Stevens, Harold B. III
  32. Motion to Reargue Filed by: Appellant Campbell, Laura; Appellate Attorney Stevens, Harold B. III
  33. Sent to Case Parties Automated by RIS for SOP processing - Lawrence G. Slason, Harold B. Stevens III, Nathan Stearns, Peter G. Raymond
  34. Entry Regarding Motion - Motion to Reargue Resolved HEE/KRC/WDC
  35. Notice to Parties Recipients: Appellate Attorney Raymond, Peter G.; Appellate Attorney Slason, Lawrence G.; Appellate Attorney Stearns, Nathan; Appellate Attorney Stevens, Harold B. III
  36. Sent to Case Parties Automated by RIS for SOP processing - Lawrence G. Slason, Harold B. Stevens III, Nathan Stearns, Peter G. Raymond
  37. Case Closed
  38. Mandate Letter

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more