Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2023-09-18
Status Judgment
Type Dafs
Docket 34 entries
Disposition entry of judgment

Parties

Plaintiff County Of Fresno
Defendant Flynn, Daniel L

Docket Entries

  1. Confidential document filed Comment Genetic Test Results
  2. Filed Complaint Issued Summons
  3. Proof of Service Comment Served: Daniel L Flynn / Personal Service
  4. Answer Filed Family Support
  5. Clerk's Certificate of Mailing Comment I certify that I am not a party to this cause and a true copy of the Answer was placed in a sealed envelope and placed for collection and mailing on the date and at the place shown below following our ordinary business practice. I am readily familiar with this court's practice for collection and processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service with postage fully prepaid. Place of Mailing: Fresno, California on . Parties served: Department of Child Support Services P.O.Box 12946 Fresno, Ca. 93779-2946
  6. Notice of Motion Comment Judgment, CS, Health Care, Join other parent / HRG: @ 8AM Dept 302
  7. Proof of Service by Mail Comment Party Served:Daniel Flynn Date Mailed:
  8. Proof of Service by Mail Comment Party Served:Daniel L. Flynn and Danielle Blevins Date Mailed:
  9. Motion for Entry of Judgment Original Type Motion for Entry of Judgment Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Continued Court's Motion Parties Present Respondent: FLYNN, DANIEL L Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  10. Motion Child Support Original Type Motion Child Support Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Continued Court's Motion Parties Present Respondent: FLYNN, DANIEL L Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  11. Motion - Health Care Original Type Motion - Health Care Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Continued Court's Motion Parties Present Respondent: FLYNN, DANIEL L Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  12. Motion - Joinder Original Type Motion - Joinder Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Continued Court's Motion Comment Join other parent Parties Present Respondent: FLYNN, DANIEL L Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  13. Appeared in Person
  14. Commissioner Fogarty Minute Order. See attached.
  15. Document filed Comment Document: Waiver of Disqualification
  16. Proof of Service by Mail Comment Served: Daniel L Flynn / Mailed on
  17. Proof of Service by Mail Comment Served: Daniel L Flynn. Mailed on
  18. Motion for Entry of Judgment Original Type Motion for Entry of Judgment Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Continued Party's Motion Comment cont. to allow parties to proceed with genetic testing Parties Present Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  19. Motion Child Support Original Type Motion Child Support Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Continued Party's Motion Parties Present Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  20. Motion - Health Care Original Type Motion - Health Care Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Continued Party's Motion Parties Present Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  21. Motion - Joinder Original Type Motion - Joinder Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Continued Party's Motion Parties Present Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  22. Motion - Genetic Test Original Type Motion - Genetic Test Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Continued Party's Motion Parties Present Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  23. Appeared in Person
  24. Commissioner Fogarty Minute Order. See attached.
  25. Proof of Service by Mail Comment Date mailed: Served: Daniel L Flynn
  26. Proof of Service by Mail Comment Served: Daniel L Flynn and Danielle Blevins / Mailed on
  27. Proof of Service by Mail Comment Date mailed; Served: Daniel L Flynn & Danielle Blevins
  28. Motion for Entry of Judgment Original Type Motion for Entry of Judgment Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Heard Comment cont'd from to allow LCSA perfect notice of GT results
  29. Motion Child Support Original Type Motion Child Support Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Heard
  30. Motion - Health Care Original Type Motion - Health Care Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Heard
  31. Motion - Joinder Original Type Motion - Joinder Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Heard
  32. Motion - Genetic Test Original Type Motion - Genetic Test Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Heard Parties Present Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  33. Appeared in Person
  34. Remote Appearance Via Zoom

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.