Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Fresno County

Court

Fresno County

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-09-19
Status Judgment
Type Dafs
Docket 45 entries
Disposition judgment

Parties

Plaintiff County Of Fresno
Defendant Villanueva, Natalie
Photo of Hon. Judicial Officer fogarty, Katherine

Judge

Hon. Judicial Officer fogarty, Katherine

Fresno County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  3. Proof of Service of Summons and Complaint
  4. Comment Party served by personal service: Natalie Villanueva / Date served:
  5. Answer Filed Family Support
  6. Income and Expense Declaration
  7. Clerk's Certificate of Mailing
  8. Comment I certify that I am not a party to this cause and a true copy of the (Answer and IED ) was placed in a sealed envelope and placed for collection and mailing on the date and at the place shown below following our ordinary business practice. I am readily familiar with this court's practice for collection and processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service with postage fully prepaid. Place of Mailing: Fresno, California on ( ) . Parties served: DCSS ( )
  9. Notice of Motion
  10. Comment Judgment, CS, HC, Joinder - @8:00AM D302
  11. Proof of Service by Mail
  12. Comment Party Served:Natalie Villanueva Date Mailed:
  13. Proof of Service by Mail
  14. Comment Party Served:Christopher M. Campbell Date Mailed:
  15. Motion for Entry of Judgment
  16. Original Type Motion for Entry of Judgment
  17. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  18. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  19. Result Heard
  20. Respondent: VILLANUEVA, NATALIE
  21. Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  22. Motion - Child Support
  23. Original Type Motion - Child Support
  24. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  25. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  26. Result Heard
  27. Respondent: VILLANUEVA, NATALIE
  28. Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  29. Motion - Health Care
  30. Original Type Motion - Health Care
  31. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  32. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  33. Result Heard
  34. Respondent: VILLANUEVA, NATALIE
  35. Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  36. Motion - Joinder
  37. Original Type Motion - Joinder
  38. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  39. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  40. Result Heard
  41. Respondent: VILLANUEVA, NATALIE
  42. Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  43. Commissioner Fogarty Minute Order. See attached.
  44. Appeared in Person
  45. Family Code 4065 Waiver

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more