Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Florida Civitech Unified Court

Court

Florida Civitech Unified Court

Florida

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-10-20
Status CLOSED
Type Auto Negligence
Docket 54 entries
Disposition order of dismissal

Parties

Plaintiff Klotz, Britton | Klotz, Krystal
Defendant Keeley, David Raymond | Ducky Recovery Llc | Ducky Equipment Llc
Photo of Hon. Patterson Christopher N

Judge

Hon. Patterson Christopher N

Holmes County (FL)

Florida

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. DescriptionRECORDED FINAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
  2. DescriptionCase Status set to CLOSED
  3. DescriptionFINAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
  4. DescriptionSTIPULATION FOR ORDER OF DISMISAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE
  5. DescriptionNOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF DEPOSITIONS
  6. DescriptionNOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION
  7. DescriptionDEFENDANTS' OBJECTION TO PLAINTIFFS' NOTICE OF PRODUCTION FROM NON-PARTIES
  8. DescriptionPLAINTIFFS' FIRST NOTICE OF PRODUCTION FROM NONPARTY
  9. DescriptionPLAINTIFFS' NOTICE OF SERVICE OF SECOND INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT DAVID KEELEY
  10. Plaintiff Attorney: B SHANNON SAUNDERS Assigned to BRITTON KLOTZ
  11. Judge: GARCIA , ANA M HONORABLE Assigned
  12. CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER 2021-00-06
  13. COMPLAINT
  14. CIVIL COVER SHEET
  15. Payment received: $400.00 Receipt Number MX 2023010921
  16. Assessment 1 Total Assessed $400.00 Balance Remaining $0.00
  17. Assessment 1 assessed at sum $400.00
  18. DEFENDANT DAVID KELLEY'S RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS
  19. DEFENDANT DUCKY EQUIPMENT LLC'S RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS
  20. DEFENDANT DUCKY RECOVERY LLC'S RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS
  21. DEFENDANT, DAVID KELLEY'S, ANSWER, AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES, DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL, AND INCORPORATED MOTION TO STRIKE SUBPART(G) OF PARAGRAPH NINETEEN (19)
  22. ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
  23. PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT DAVID KEELEY'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
  24. JUDGE HAS BEEN REASSIGNED
  25. Judge: PATTERSON , CHRISTOPHER HONORABLE Assigned
  26. PLAINTIFF BRITTON KLOTZ'S REQUEST FOR COPIES
  27. ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
  28. ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL DISCOVERY
  29. ORDER REQUIRING GOOD FAITH CONFERRAL
  30. DEFENDANT, DAVID KELLEY'S, MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPONDTO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
  31. DEFENDANTS' , DUCKY RECOVERY LLC AND DUCKY EQUIPMENT LLC, MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL DISCOVERY
  32. DEFENDANT'S NOTICE OF PRODUCTION FROM NON-PARTIES
  33. PLAINTIFFS' NOTICE OF SERVICE OF FIRST INTERROGATORIES, REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, AND REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION TO DEFENDANTS DAVID KEELEY, DUCKY RECOVERY LLC, AND DUCKY EQUIPMENT LLC
  34. DEFENDANT DUCKY RECOVERY LLC'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO PLAINTIFF
  35. DEFENDANT DUCKY RECOVERY LLC'S NOTICE OF SERVICE OF FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF
  36. DEFENDANT, DUCKY RECOVERY LLC'S, NOTICE OF SERVICE OF FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF, KRYSTAL KLOTZ
  37. DEFENDANTS, DUCKY RECOVERY LLC AND DUCKY EQUIPMENT LLC'S, ANSWER, AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES, DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL, AND INCORPORATED MOTION TO STRIKE SUBPART (G) OF PARAGRAPHS TWENTY-FOUR (24) AND TWENTY-SEVEN(27)
  38. RECEIPT
  39. SUMMONS ISSUED: 10/24/2023
  40. SUMMONS ISSUED: 10/24/2023
  41. SUMMONS ISSUED: 10/24/2023
  42. Payment received: $30.00 Receipt Number MX 2023011014
  43. Assessment 2 Total Assessed $30.00 Balance Remaining $0.00
  44. Assessment 2 assessed at sum $30.00
  45. RECEIPT
  46. Plaintiff Attorney: B SHANNON SAUNDERS Assigned to KRYSTAL KLOTZ
  47. Plaintiff Attorney: B SHANNON SAUNDERS Assigned to BRITTON KLOTZ
  48. Judge: GARCIA , ANA M HONORABLE Assigned
  49. CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER 2021-00-06
  50. COMPLAINT
  51. CIVIL COVER SHEET
  52. Payment received: $400.00 Receipt Number MX 2023010921
  53. Assessment 1 Total Assessed $400.00 Balance Remaining $0.00
  54. Assessment 1 assessed at sum $400.00

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more