Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Stamford County

Court

Stamford County

Connecticut

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-10-23
Type M 90 Misc All Other
Docket 61 entries
Disposition judgment of dismissal

Parties

Plaintiff Eric Grayson
Defendant Spears, Manning & Martini, Llc|Joseph Martini|Ivan Ladd Smith|A. Mark Getwchew|Denora Getachew
Photo of Hon. Edward Krumeich

Judge

Hon. Edward Krumeich

Connecticut

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. SUMMONS
  2. COMPLAINT
  3. CONTINUATION OF PARTIES
  4. SUBSTITUTED COMPLAINT
  5. NOTICE of Comparison of Complaint with the First Substituted Complaint
  6. SUBSTITUTED COMPLAINT Second Substituted Complaint
  7. SUBSTITUTED COMPLAINT
  8. NOTICE of Comparison of Complaint with the First Substituted Complaint
  9. SUBSTITUTED COMPLAINT Second Substituted Complaint
  10. NOTICE of Comparison of First Substituted Complaint with Second Substituted Complaint
  11. RETURN OF SERVICE Getachew
  12. RETURN OF SERVICE Spear, Manning, et al.
  13. SUPPLEMENTAL RETURN Spears, Manning, et al.
  14. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD RESULT: Granted 12/5/2023 HON EDWARD KRUMEICH
  15. ORDER RESULT: Granted 12/5/2023 HON EDWARD KRUMEICH
  16. SPECIAL MOTION TO DISMISS / COUNTERCLAIM / CROSS CLAIM RESULT: Order 9/25/2024 HON EDWARD KRUMEICH
  17. ORDER RESULT: Order 12/22/2023 HON EDWARD KRUMEICH
  18. ORDER RESULT: Order 9/25/2024 HON EDWARD KRUMEICH
  19. MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION re Entry 109.00
  20. SPECIAL MOTION TO DISMISS / COUNTERCLAIM / CROSS CLAIM RESULT: Order 9/25/2024 HON EDWARD KRUMEICH
  21. ORDER RESULT: Order 12/22/2023 HON EDWARD KRUMEICH
  22. ORDER RESULT: Order 9/25/2024 HON EDWARD KRUMEICH
  23. MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION (re: No. 111.00)
  24. CASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116) seeking an Extension of the time to file an Objection/Opp to the SMTD and adj. of the Hearing
  25. CASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116) seeking an Ext of the time to file an Objection/Opp to the SMTD and adj. of the Hearing on Consent RESULT: Order 1/18/2024 HON YAMINI MENON
  26. ORDER RESULT: Order 1/18/2024 HON YAMINI MENON
  27. OBJECTION to the Martini Defendants' Special Motion to Dismiss, #109.00
  28. OBJECTION to the Getachews' Special Motion to Dismiss, #111.00
  29. MEMORANDUM in opposition to Special Motions to Dismiss filed by all Defendants, see #109.00 & #111.00
  30. AFFIDAVIT of Eric D. Grayson in Opposition to the Special Motions to Dismiss, #109.00 & 111.00
  31. EXHIBITS attached to the Grayson Affidavit
  32. CASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116) to move hearing on MTD (109.00) from 9:30 a.m. to 2 p.m. on 2/20/24 RESULT: Order 2/15/2024 HON EDWARD KRUMEICH
  33. ORDER RESULT: Order 2/15/2024 HON EDWARD KRUMEICH
  34. REPLY MEMORANDUM to plaintiff's Objection (Entry 115.00) to defendant's Special Motion to Dismiss (Entry 109.00)
  35. CASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116) re Special Motions to Dismiss (Entry Nos. 109.00 and 111.00) RESULT: Order 2/16/2024 HON EDWARD KRUMEICH
  36. ORDER RESULT: Order 2/16/2024 HON EDWARD KRUMEICH
  37. CASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116) RESULT: Order 3/21/2024 HON EDWARD KRUMEICH
  38. ORDER RESULT: Order 3/21/2024 HON EDWARD KRUMEICH
  39. CASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116) seeking to Adjourn the Hearing on the SMTD to 4/29/2024 on consent
  40. CASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116) consent request to reschedule hearing on 109.00 and 111.00 from 6/3/24 to 6/24/24 RESULT: Order 5/30/2024 HON EDWARD KRUMEICH
  41. ORDER RESULT: Order 5/30/2024 HON EDWARD KRUMEICH
  42. CASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116) seeking an Adjournment of the SMTD from 6/24/2024 to 7/15/2024 RESULT: Order 6/20/2024 HON EDWARD KRUMEICH
  43. ORDER RESULT: Order 6/20/2024 HON EDWARD KRUMEICH
  44. CASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116) Spears Manning defendants' consent to 126.00 RESULT: Order 6/20/2024 HON EDWARD KRUMEICH
  45. ORDER RESULT: Order 6/20/2024 HON EDWARD KRUMEICH
  46. CASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116) requesting argument on the the SMTD be moved from 8/26/2024 to 9/16/2024 on consent RESULT: Order 8/6/2024 HON EDWARD KRUMEICH
  47. ORDER RESULT: Order 8/6/2024 HON EDWARD KRUMEICH
  48. MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON MOTION
  49. JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL RESULT: HON EDWARD KRUMEICH
  50. WITHDRAWAL OF ACTION AGAINST PARTICULAR DEFENDANT(S) – CASE REMAINS PENDING as to Spears, Manning & Martini, LLC, Joseph Martini and Ivan Ladd-Smith (only) w/ Prejudice
  51. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME to File Application for Attorneys' Fees and Costs RESULT: Order 10/28/2024 HON EDWARD KRUMEICH
  52. ORDER RESULT: Order 10/28/2024 HON EDWARD KRUMEICH
  53. NOTICE Notice of No Objection/Consent to the Getachews' Motion for an Extension
  54. MOTION TO REARGUE/RECONSIDER the Court's Memorandum of Decision (#129.00, 9/25/2024) and Judgment (#130.00, 95/2024) RESULT: Denied 10/28/2024 HON EDWARD KRUMEICH
  55. ORDER RESULT: Denied 10/28/2024 HON EDWARD KRUMEICH
  56. MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION to Reargue/Reconsider
  57. EXHIBITS to Memorandum in Support of Motion to Reargue/Reconsider
  58. MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION to Reargue/Reconsider, replacing #135.00, 10/15/2024, correcting a typo
  59. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME to File Application for Attorneys' Fees and Costs
  60. OBJECTION TO MOTION for Rergument (No. 134.00)
  61. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME to file a Reply to the Defendants' Objection (#139.00) to Plaintiff's Motion to Reconsider (#134.00)

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more