Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Kern Co Non Criminal Court

Court

Kern Co Non Criminal Court

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-10-10
Status Pending
Type 14 Ed Eminent Domain/inverse Condemnation
Docket 48 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Baca, Maria De Las Nieves Rubio
Defendant Griffith Company, A California Corporation|City Of Bakersfield|Cross griffith Company, A California Corporation|Cross roes 1 Through 50, Inclusive
Photo of Hon. Clark, Thomas S.|Brumfield, Lorna H.|Chapin, Sidney P.

Judge

Hon. Clark, Thomas S.|Brumfield, Lorna H.|Chapin, Sidney P.

Kern County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice
  2. Comment SUMMONS DOES NOT CONFORM EXACT TO COMPLAINT
  3. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C)
  4. Comment Re: 3.110 Hearing Date: 02/01/2024 Hearing Time: 8:30 AM Hearing Department/Division: J
  5. Unserved
  6. Unserved
  7. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C)
  8. Judicial Officer Zulfa, David
  9. Hearing Time 8:30 AM
  10. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C)
  11. Judicial Officer Zulfa, David
  12. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Answer- Caption does not conform exact to complaint. Please ensure caption conforms exact to operative complaint.
  13. Comment Defendant City of Bakersfield's CMC Statement
  14. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Answer- Caption does not conform exact to complaint. Review " does" verbiage. Please ensure caption conforms exact to operative complaint.
  15. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Cross Complaint- Caption for previously filed complaint dated 10/18/20223 does not conform exact. Review " does" verbiage. Please ensure caption conforms exact.
  16. Comment Notice of Change of Handling Attorney
  17. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) View Document Case Management Conference 04/16/2024 Judicial Officer Clark, Thomas S. Hearing Time 8:15 AM Result Held
  18. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Cross complaint- Name listed is inconsistent. Name in the caption does not conform to the the name in the upper left header just beneath the attorney information, title just beneath the case number and the body. The true name of the Cross complainant must be consistent throughout. Summons on cross complaint - Summons does not conform exact to complaint. Please review party information (including does information). Date and "clerk by" section is to be left blank. Court clerk will issue.
  19. Judicial Officer Clark, Thomas S. Comment to consolidate with BCV-23-104256
  20. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment RE: Notice of Change of Address.
  21. Comment with BCV-23-104256
  22. Comment for Defendant, City of Bakersfield
  23. Comment for Plaintiffs, Maria De Les Ruibio Baca & Shenogul Medial, LLC
  24. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Cross complaint - Party name listed in the caption does not conform to the name in the upper left header just beneath the attorney information, body and title under the case number. True name is to be consistent throughout. Party is being listed as GRIFFITH COMPANY & GRIFFITH COMPANY, a California corporation. Summons - does not conform exact to complaint. Please review party information.
  25. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Proof of service as to the answer and cross complaint has been filed with its submission. Proof of service as to the summons is premature.
  26. Cross Action Cross-Complaint File Date 07/17/2024
  27. View Document Case Management Conference 04/16/2024 View Document Case Management Conference 07/18/2024 Judicial Officer Clark, Thomas S. Hearing Time 8:15 AM Result Held Comment continued from 04/16/2024
  28. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Cross complaint - All cross actions are not listed ( Review CRC 2.111) *Party name listed in the caption does not conform to the name in the upper left header just beneath the attorney information, first paragraph and title under the case number. True name is to be consistent throughout.
  29. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Answer - Cross complaint on behalf of City if Bakersfield has not been filed.
  30. Comment for Defendant/Cross-Complainant, Griffth Company
  31. Comment for Plaintiffs, Maria De Les Ruibio Baca and Shenogul Medial, LLC.
  32. Cross Action Cross-Complaint File Date 10/10/2024
  33. Comment Defendant City of Bakersfield's Case Management Statement
  34. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Rejected per CRC 3.350(d). Cross Complaint - Please ensure the name in the upper left header just beneath the attorney information conforms to the body of the answer and caption under the case number.
  35. View Document Case Management Conference 07/18/2024 View Document Case Management Conference 10/16/2024 Judicial Officer Clark, Thomas S. Hearing Time 8:15 AM Result Held Comment continued from 07/18/2024
  36. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Rejected per CRC 3.350(d).
  37. Comment of City of Bakersfield's Cross-Complaint (BCV-24-103492)
  38. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Answer to City of Bakersfield Cross-Complaint filed as of 10/23/24.
  39. View Document Case Management Conference 10/16/2024 Judicial Officer Clark, Thomas S. Hearing Time 8:15 AM Comment continued from 10/16/2024

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more