Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Minnesota Supreme Court

Court

Minnesota Supreme Court

Minnesota

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-01-11
Status Closed
Type Standard Civil Tax Court
Docket 54 entries
Disposition allowed

Docket Entries

  1. otion - Extension of Time - File Appeal
  2. rder - Deny - The motion of relator Renee Vasko for a second extension of time to file and serve a petition for rehearing in this appeal is denied.
  3. otion - Second Extension of Time - Petition for Rehearing
  4. rder - Grant Extension of Time - Petition for Rehearing Due 9/18/24
  5. otion - Extension of Time - Petition for Rehearing
  6. pinion - Published
  7. otice - Opinion Release Imminent
  8. vent - Nonoral - En Banc
  9. orrespondence - Incoming - Copy of Email to Tax Court
  10. rief - Reply E-Filed
  11. vent - Nonoral En Banc - scheduled March 7, 2024
  12. rder - Grant - Relator's reply brief due 2/9/24. No further extensions will be allowed. Nonoral consideration will be rescheduled on the March 2024 court calendar.
  13. otion - Extension of Time - Relator's Reply Brief
  14. vent - Nonoral En Banc - scheduled February 6, 2024
  15. rder - Grant Extension of Time - Reply Brief Due 1/9/24. This Matter is Stricken from the 1/8/24 Calendar. Nonoral Consideration Will be Rescheduled on the February 2024 Calendar.
  16. otion - Extension of Time - Reply Brief
  17. vent - Nonoral En Banc - scheduled January 8, 2024
  18. rder - Grant - Reply Brief due 12/15/23
  19. otion - Extension of Time - Reply Brief
  20. rder - Grant Extension of Time - Reply Brief Due 11/15/23
  21. otion - Extension of Time - Reply Brief
  22. rief - Respondent E-Filed
  23. vent - Electronic Record Submitted/Received - MACS
  24. otice - Request Trial Court/Agency File
  25. rief - Appellant E-Filed
  26. rder - Grant - Relator's SIGNED brief due 9/1/23.
  27. otion - Accept Late Filings - Relator's Brief
  28. ther - Rejected Appellant Brief - Signature Missing
  29. rder - Grant Extension of Time - Appellant Brief Due 8/7/23
  30. otion - Extension of Time - Brief
  31. rder - Grant Extension of Time - Appellant Brief Due 7/17/23
  32. otion - Extension of Time - Appellant Brief
  33. rder - Grant Extension of Time - Appellant Brief Due 6/15/23
  34. otion - Extension of Time - Appellant Brief
  35. rder - Grant IFP -Grant Motion to File an Informal Brief
  36. otion - Brief - Accept Informal
  37. ther - Docket Notation - Rejected Motion for Extension of Time as Unnecessary
  38. otion - In Forma Pauperis
  39. mended Transcript - Delivery Certificate - CR Menth
  40. ranscript - Delivery Certificate - CR Menth
  41. opy of District Court Order Granting IFP to "Support Motion for IFP"
  42. rder - Remedy Deficiencies - Relator's Conforming Motion for IFP due in 30 days; Relator's Brief Due in 30 days or within 14 days must file a motion for late transcripts.
  43. ejected IFP Order for District Court Proceedings Dated 5/23/22 - Pages were Sideways - Unclear Why It Was Filed
  44. ther - Correcting Deficiencies - Copy of Decision Being Appealed
  45. ejected Copy of IFP Order in Support of Motion from Relator - Document formatting issues
  46. tatement - Case - Respondent
  47. ffidavit - Service of writ of cert
  48. rit - Certiorari
  49. otion - In Forma Pauperis
  50. tatement - Case - Relator
  51. etition - Certiorari
  52. rder - Grant - Petition for Writ of Certiorari and the Writ of Certiorari for Review of the Tax Court Order Dated 12/15/22 Must be Filed by 2/13/23
  53. ffidavit - Service - Motion for Extension of Time on Tax Court
  54. otice - Case Filing

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more