Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Butte County Superior

Court

Butte County Superior

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-10-09
Status Active
Type Dissolution W/o Minor Children
Docket 57 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Thibeau, Chelsea
Defendant Cochrane, Lance
Photo of Hon. Caraway Corie J

Judge

Hon. Caraway Corie J

Butte County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CRC 5.83 Status Conference Judicial Officer Caraway, Corie J Hearing Time 10:30 AM Comment Dismissal
  2. Petition for Disso, Legal Sep, Nullity, Dom Part
  3. Notice of Assignment and Status Conference Judicial Officer Candela, Michael P
  4. Proof of Service Served
  5. Proof of Service of Summons Filed Comment Proof of Service of Summons Filed- Jurisdiction Date
  6. Proof of Service Comment Proof of Service of Notice of Assignment and Status Conference as to Respondent
  7. Response - Disso, Legal Sep, Nullity, Domestic Partnership Comment Response and Request for Dissolution of Marriage
  8. Status Conference Statement
  9. Status Conference Statement
  10. CRC 5.83 Status Conference - Initial Original Type CRC 5.83 Status Conference - Initial Judicial Officer Sears, Leah B Hearing Time 1:30 PM Result Held
  11. Minute Order
  12. Notice of Hearing Comment Notice of Time and Place of Further Case Management Status Conference
  13. Substitution of Attorney
  14. Status Conference Statement
  15. Status Conference Statement
  16. CRC 5.83 Status Conference Original Type CRC 5.83 Status Conference Judicial Officer Candela, Michael P Hearing Time 10:30 AM Result Held Comment 2nd - Petition filed
  17. Minute Order
  18. Declaration re Service of Declaration of Disclosure
  19. RFO-OSC-MTN - Other (Non DCSS) Comment Request for Order to Quash Subpoena
  20. Memorandum of Points and Authorities Comment Points and Authorities in Support of Motion to Quash
  21. Proof of Service Comment Proof of Electronic Service of Request for Order Regarding Quash Subpoena as to Nathan Jones
  22. Responsive Declaration Comment Responsive Declaration to Request for Order
  23. Opposition - No Fee Comment Opposition to Motion to Quash Subpoenas; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Opposition
  24. Declaration Comment Declaration of Nathan O.S. Jones in Opposition to Motion to Quash
  25. Declaration Comment Reply Declaration
  26. Declaration Comment Supplemental Declaration
  27. RFO/OSC Motion Hearing Original Type RFO/OSC Motion Hearing Judicial Officer Candela, Michael P Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment Petitioner's Request for Order to Quash Subpoena filed 12/27/24
  28. Minute Order
  29. Case Under Submission for Decision Judicial Officer Candela, Michael P
  30. Order Judicial Officer Candela, Michael P Comment Order After Hearing
  31. Proof of Mailing
  32. RFO-OSC-MTN - Other (Non DCSS) Comment Request for Order for Reconsideration and Bifurcation of Issues
  33. Memorandum of Points and Authorities Comment Points and Authorities in Support of Motion for Bifurcation
  34. Responsive Declaration Comment Responsive Declaration to Request for Order
  35. RFO/OSC Motion Hearing Original Type RFO/OSC Motion Hearing Judicial Officer Candela, Michael P Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment Petitioner's Request for Order for Reconsideration and Bifurcation of Issues Filed 2/7/25 Parties Present Petitioner: Thibeau, Chelsea Retained Counsel: McNally, Miriam Elizabeth Respondent: Cochrane, Lance Retained Counsel: Jones, Nathan Owen
  36. Minute Order
  37. Order Judicial Officer Candela, Michael P Comment Order After Hearing
  38. Settlement Conference Statement
  39. CRC 5.83 Status Conference Original Type CRC 5.83 Status Conference Judicial Officer Shockley, Doris L Hearing Time 10:30 AM Result Held Comment Petition filed - 3rd Parties Present Petitioner Retained Counsel: McNally, Miriam Elizabeth Respondent Retained Counsel: Jones, Nathan Owen
  40. Minute Order
  41. Responsive Declaration Comment Responsive Declaration to Request to Reschedule Hearing
  42. Request to Reschedule Hearing
  43. Order on Request to Reschedule Hearing Judicial Officer Caraway, Corie J
  44. Declaration Comment Declaration Regarding Notice and Service of Request
  45. Proof of Mailing
  46. Notice of Reassignment Judicial Officer Caraway, Corie J
  47. Trial Setting Conference Original Type Trial Setting Conference Judicial Officer Caraway, Corie J Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment Petitioner's Request for Order for Reconsideration and Bifurcation of Issues Filed 2/7/25, Set from on Issue of Bifurcation Parties Present Petitioner Retained Counsel: McNally, Miriam Elizabeth Respondent Retained Counsel: Jones, Nathan Owen
  48. Trial Setting Conference Original Type Trial Setting Conference Judicial Officer Caraway, Corie J Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment Petitioner's Request for Order for Reconsideration and Bifurcation of Issues Filed 2/7/25, Set from on Issue of Bifurcation Parties Present Petitioner Retained Counsel: McNally, Miriam Elizabeth Respondent Retained Counsel: Jones, Nathan Owen
  49. Minute Order
  50. Brief Comment Petitioner's Pre-Hearing Brief, Witness List and Exhibit List
  51. Brief Comment Hearing Brief, Statement of Witnesses and Evidence
  52. Trial Setting Conference Original Type Trial Setting Conference Judicial Officer Caraway, Corie J Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment Petitioner's Request for Order for Reconsideration and Bifurcation of Issues Filed 2/7/25, Set from on Issue of Bifurcation - Continued from 9/23/25 for Receipt of Pretrial Briefs and Trial Setting
  53. Minute Order
  54. RFO-OSC-MTN - Other (Non DCSS) Comment Request for Order to Compel Discovery Responses
  55. Proof of Service Comment Proof of Electronic Service of File Stamped Request for Order and Blank Responsive Declaration as to Respondent
  56. RFO/OSC Motion Hearing Judicial Officer Caraway, Corie J Hearing Time 8:30 AM Comment Petitioner's Request for Order to Compel Discovery Responses filed 11/14/25
  57. Court Trial Judicial Officer Caraway, Corie J Hearing Time 8:30 AM Comment Petitioner's Request for Order for Reconsideration and Bifurcation of Issues Filed 2/7/25, Set from on Issue of Bifurcation -Set from 11/04/2025 for Full- Day

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more