Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Calaveras County Superior

Court

Calaveras County Superior

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-03-09
Status Warrant
Type Traffic Misdemeanor
Docket 84 entries

Parties

Plaintiff People Of The State Of California
Defendant Clements, Daniel Ray
Photo of Hon. Witry Traci L

Judge

Hon. Witry Traci L

Calaveras County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. Minute Order
  2. DA Cite Letter to Appear
  3. Confidential Defendant Information
  4. Prior letter sent to
  5. Arraignment
  6. Original Type Arraignment
  7. Judicial Officer Witry, Traci L.
  8. Hearing Time 10:00 AM
  9. Result Arraigned
  10. Defendant: Clements, Daniel Ray
  11. Public Defender: Fitzgerald Alvarez & Ciummo PLC
  12. Legal rights of defendant
  13. Public Defender Appointed
  14. Own Recognizance Release
  15. Minute Order
  16. Pretrial Conference
  17. Original Type Pretrial Conference
  18. Judicial Officer Healy, Timothy S.
  19. Hearing Time 8:30 AM
  20. Result Continued Party's Motion
  21. Defendant: Clements, Daniel Ray
  22. Public Defender: Fitzgerald Alvarez & Ciummo PLC
  23. Minute Order
  24. Pretrial Conference
  25. Judicial Officer Healy, Timothy S.
  26. Hearing Time 8:30 AM
  27. Result Continued Party's Motion
  28. Defendant
  29. Public Defender: Fitzgerald Alvarez & Ciummo PLC
  30. Minute Order
  31. Pretrial Conference
  32. Original Type Pretrial Conference
  33. Judicial Officer Sullivan, Bradley W.
  34. Hearing Time 8:30 AM
  35. Result Continued Party's Motion
  36. Defendant: Clements, Daniel Ray
  37. Public Defender: Fitzgerald Alvarez & Ciummo PLC
  38. Minute Order
  39. Motion - No Fee
  40. Pretrial Conference
  41. Original Type Pretrial Conference
  42. Judicial Officer Sullivan, Bradley W.
  43. Hearing Time 8:30 AM
  44. Result Continued Party's Motion
  45. Amended Complaint Filed - No Fee
  46. Minute Order
  47. Proof of Service
  48. Pretrial Conference
  49. Original Type Pretrial Conference
  50. Judicial Officer Healy, Timothy S.
  51. Hearing Time 8:30 AM
  52. Result Continued Party's Motion
  53. Defendant
  54. Public Defender: Fitzgerald Alvarez & Ciummo PLC
  55. Minute Order
  56. Pretrial Conference
  57. Original Type Pretrial Conference
  58. Judicial Officer Healy, Timothy S.
  59. Hearing Time 8:30 AM
  60. Result Continued Party's Motion
  61. Defendant
  62. Public Defender: Fitzgerald Alvarez & Ciummo PLC
  63. Minute Order
  64. Pretrial Conference
  65. Original Type Pretrial Conference
  66. Judicial Officer Healy, Timothy S.
  67. Hearing Time 8:30 AM
  68. Result Failure to Appear
  69. Defendant
  70. Public Defender: Fitzgerald Alvarez & Ciummo PLC
  71. Minute Order
  72. Calendared at Request of Defendant
  73. Request to Recall Warrant
  74. Original Type Request to Recall Warrant
  75. Judicial Officer Richardson, Daniel K
  76. Hearing Time 1:30 PM
  77. Result Not Held
  78. Minute Order
  79. Calendared at Request of Defendant
  80. Request to Recall Warrant
  81. Original Type Request to Recall Warrant
  82. Judicial Officer Richardson, Daniel K
  83. Hearing Time 1:30 PM
  84. Result Not Held

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more