Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Nevada Appeal Court

Court

Nevada Appeal Court

Nevada

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-09-20
Status Case Closed
Type Civil Appeal Family Law Other
Docket 21 entries
Disposition award of

Docket Entries

  1. Transferred from Supreme Court. (COA).
  2. Filed Appellant's Emergency Motion for Stay. (TRANSFERRED FROM THE SUPREME COURT PER 06/02/23 NOTICE). (COA)
  3. Filed Order Denying Stay. Having considered the motion, we conclude that Valles Favela has not demonstrated that the factors militate in favor of a stay. Accordingly, we deny the stay motion. (COA)
  4. Filed Request for Transcript of Proceedings. Transcripts requested: 01/31/22 and 02/07/22. To Court Reporter: Maria Balagtas. (COA)
  5. Filed Appellant's Motion to Extend Time to File Opening Brief. (COA)
  6. Filed Order Granting Motion. Appellant's opening brief and appendix due: October 2, 2023. (SC)
  7. Filed Appellant's Opening Brief. (COA)
  8. Filed Appellant's Appendix to Opening Brief - Vol. 1. (COA)
  9. Filed Appellant's Appendix to Opening Brief - Vol. 2. (COA)
  10. Filed Appellant's Appendix to Opening Brief - Vol. 3. (COA)
  11. Filed Appellant's Appendix to Opening Brief - Vol. 4. (COA)
  12. Filed Appellant's Appendix to Opening Brief - Vol. 5. (COA)
  13. Filed Appellant's Appendix to Opening Brief - Vol. 6. (COA)
  14. Filed Order to File Document. To date, respondent has failed to file an answering brief. Respondent shall have 7 days from the date of this order to file and serve the answering brief. (SC)
  15. Filed Proper Person Motion to Extend Time to File Her Fast Track Response Brief. (SC)
  16. Filed Order Granting Motion. Respondent has filed a pro se motion for an extension of time to file a fast track response brief. We remind respondent that this matter is not proceeding under the rule governing fast track appeals and we construe the motion as a motion for an extension of time to file the answering brief. Respondent shall have until January 24, 2024, to file and serve the answering brief. (COA)
  17. Filed Order. To date, respondent has failed to file the answering brief or otherwise communicate with this court. Accordingly, this appeal shall be decided without an answering brief from respondent. (COA)
  18. Briefing Completed/To Screening. (SC)
  19. Filed Order Affirming in Part, Reversing in Part and Remanding. "We affirm the district court's exercise of jurisdiction and division of property with respect to the marital residence, vehicles, and Raiders tickets. We also affirm the court's imputation of income to Jose for the purposes of determining child support and alimony. However, we reverse the court's determination that the Bank of America account was community property and its award of attorney fees and costs to Isaura and remand for further proceedings on these issues consistent with this order." COA-MG/BB/DW. (COA)
  20. Filed Order Granting Extension Per Telephonic Request. Appellant's petition for rehearing due: September 13, 2024. (COA)
  21. Transferred to Supreme Court.(COA)

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more