Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Johnson County District Court

Court

Johnson County District Court

Kansas

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-09-12
Status PENDING
Type Automobile Tort (60)
Docket 45 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Mukherji, Mirdul
Defendant Venzor, Saul|Venzor, Saul
Photo of Hon. K Christopher Jayaram

Judge

Hon. K Christopher Jayaram

Johnson County (KS)

Kansas

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. FILE STAMP 09/14/2023, SHERIFF RETURN JO CO KS, SUMMONS AND PETITION SERVED SAUL VENZOR BY SERVING ANNA VENZOR 09/14/2023 E/S
  2. PETITION AND SUMMONS ISSUED TO THE SHERIFF OF JO CO KS "SAUL VENZOR"
  3. FILE STAMP 09/12/23 03:02pm, REQUEST AND SERVICE INSTRUCTION FORM
  4. FILE STAMP 09/12/23, PETITION FOR DAMAGES PURSUANT TO K.S.A. CHAPTER 60
  5. JUDGE K CHRISTOPHER JAYARAM ASSIGNED TO CASE
  6. SCHED. MOTION TO DISMISS on 09/26/24,02:00pm,Div 12
  7. SCHED. PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE on 09/30/25,09:00am,Div 12
  8. SCHED. FINAL TRIAL CONFERENCE on 11/10/25,11:00am,Div 12
  9. SCHED. JURY TRIAL on 11/19/25,09:00am,Div 12
  10. SCHED. JURY TRIAL on 11/18/25,09:00am,Div 12
  11. SCHED. JURY TRIAL on 11/17/25,09:00am,Div 12
  12. SCHED. CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE on 08/05/24,01:30pm,Div 12
  13. FILE STAMP 04/22/24, DEFENDANTS' REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS
  14. FILE STAMP 04/08/24, EXHIBIT 1 - COVERPAGE - EMAIL CORRESPONDANCE WITH OPPOSING COUNSEL
  15. FILE STAMP 04/08/24, PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS WITH SUGGESTIONS IN SUPPORT & IN THE ALTERNATIVE, OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS
  16. FEE OF MOTION 195.00 PAID BY BRISTOL WEST INSURANCE COMPANY, Receipted Amount: $195.00 , Check No: 1638738781, Receipt NO: 24008570
  17. FILE STAMP 03/20/24, DEFENDANTS SAUL VENZOR AND ANA VENZOR'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED PETITION FOR DAMAGES AND SUGGESTIONS IN SUPPORT
  18. FILE STAMP 03/06/24, WITHDRAWAL
  19. ELECTRONIC ENTRY OF APPEARANCE BY CHRISTOPHER J CARPENTER AS A DEFENSE ATTORNEY FOR SAUL VENZOR
  20. FILE STAMP 11/28/23, ANSWER OF DEFENDANT ANA VENZOR TO FIRST AMENDED PETITION
  21. FILE STAMP 11/28/23, NOTICE OF LEAD ATTORNEY
  22. FILE STAMP 11/16/23, ANSWER OF DEFENDANT SAUL VENZOR TO FIRST AMENDED PETITION
  23. FILE STAMP 11/08/2023, SHERIFF RETURN JO CO KS, SUMMONS AND PETITION SERVED ANA VENZOR BY SERVING SAUL VENZOR 11/08/2023 E/S
  24. FILE STAMP 11/08/2023, SHERIFF RETURN JO CO KS, SUMMONS AND PETITION SERVED ANA VENZOR BY SERVING SAUL VENZOR 11/08/2023 E/S
  25. PETITION AND SUMMONS ISSUED TO THE SHERIFF OF JO CO KS "ANA VENZOR"
  26. PETITION AND SUMMONS ISSUED TO THE SHERIFF OF JO CO KS "ANA VENZOR"
  27. FILE STAMP 10/27/23 09:39pm, REQUEST AND SERVICE INSTRUCTION FORM
  28. FILE STAMP 10/27/23 09:39pm, REQUEST AND SERVICE INSTRUCTION FORM
  29. FILE STAMP 10/27/23, AMENDED PETITION FOR DAMAGES PURSUANT TO KSA CHAPTER 60
  30. SHERIFF FEE $15.00; PAID BY GERALD GRAY, RECEIPTED AMOUNT $15.00, E-PAYMENT NO: 105735964
  31. FILE STAMP 10/27/23, AMENDED PETITION FOR DAMAGES PURSUANT TO KSA CHAPTER 60
  32. FILE STAMP 10/27/23, PLAINTIFF'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED PETITION WITH SUGGESTIONS IN SUPPORT
  33. FEE OF MOTION 196.00 PAID BY ABBOTT DAVIDOSN & SOUTHARD, Receipted Amount: $196.00 , Check No: 00260, Receipt NO: 23032677
  34. FEE OF PAID BY
  35. FEE OF MOTION 195.00 PAID BY ABBOTT DAVIDSON & SOUTHARD, Receipted Amount: $195.00 , Check No: 00260, Receipt NO: 23032653
  36. FILE STAMP 10/13/23, DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND SUGGESTIONS IN SUPPORT
  37. FILE STAMP 10/13/23, NOTICE OF LEAD ATTORNEY
  38. FILE STAMP 10/13/23, ANSWER OF DEFENDANT
  39. DISPOSITIVE MOTION FEE $195.00; PAID BY CHAPMAN WESLEY WILLIAMS, RECEIPTED AMOUNT $195.00, E-PAYMENT NO: 105691125
  40. ELECTRONIC ENTRY OF APPEARANCE BY CHAPMAN WESLEY WILLIAMS AS A DEFENSE ATTORNEY FOR SAUL VENZOR
  41. FILE STAMP 09/14/2023, SHERIFF RETURN JO CO KS, SUMMONS AND PETITION SERVED SAUL VENZOR BY SERVING ANNA VENZOR 09/14/2023 E/S
  42. PETITION AND SUMMONS ISSUED TO THE SHERIFF OF JO CO KS "SAUL VENZOR"
  43. FILE STAMP 09/12/23 03:02pm, REQUEST AND SERVICE INSTRUCTION FORM
  44. FILE STAMP 09/12/23, PETITION FOR DAMAGES PURSUANT TO K.S.A. CHAPTER 60
  45. JUDGE K CHRISTOPHER JAYARAM ASSIGNED TO CASE

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more