Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Tolland County

Court

Tolland County

Connecticut

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2021-12-23
Type C 00 Contracts Construction All Other
Docket 68 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Robert John Houlihan
Defendant H Con, Llc|Payne Construction Services, Inc.|Nadeau Brothers Concrete, Llc|Nadeau Brothers Foundations, Llc Removed|Richard Chick D/b/a Richard Chick Masonry|Dicioccio Property Services, Llc|Anthony Gregorios|Jude Stansbury Non Appearing|Gregorio's Concrete, Llc

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  2. Appearance
  3. Appearance
  4. Appearance
  5. Appearance
  6. Appearance
  7. Appearance
  8. Appearance
  9. Appearance
  10. Appearance
  11. Notice of Service of Interrogatories and Requests for Production - R Houlihan
  12. Notice of Service of Interrogatories and Requests for Production - Houlihan
  13. Non-Party Witness, CT Foundation's Objections to Production Req, Mtn for Protective Order & to Quash
  14. Reply to CFSIC's Obj, to Discovery Requests AND Obj. to CFSIC's Motion to Quash - Entry 117.00
  15. Memo of Law in Support of Reply and Objection - Entry No. 120.00
  16. Non-Party Witness, CT Foundation Solutions Indemnity Co, Inc.'s Objection, Protective Order/Quash
  17. re Motion to Substitute Party 125.00
  18. to First Amended Complaint
  19. DiCiccio's Answer and Special Defenses to Pltf's Amended Complaint
  20. DiCioccio's Answer to Apportionment Complaint
  21. to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint
  22. Apportionment Defendant Chick's Answer to Apportionment Complaint
  23. Def Nadeau Brothers Concrete LLC's Motion for Extension of Time to Discovery Served by Plaintiffs
  24. Def Nadeau Brothers Concrete LLC's Notice of Objections to Pls' First Set of Interrogatories
  25. Def Nadeau Brothers Concrete LLC's Notice of Objections to Pls' First Set of Requests for Production
  26. Revised Apportionment Complaint
  27. re Revised Apportionment Complaint
  28. OF COUNSEL RE: SUBPOENA DISCOVERY DISPUTES
  29. (Second Motion)
  30. Non-Party Witness, CT Foundation Solutions Indemnity Co, Inc's Notice of Compliance
  31. Non-Party Witness, CT Foundations' Filing of Documents Under Seal for in Camera Review
  32. in Support of in Camera Review of Documents
  33. to plaintiff's second amended complaint
  34. Memorandum of Law Concerning CFSIC Privilege Claim
  35. to Revised Apportionment Complaint
  36. to Second Amended Complaint
  37. Non-Party Witness, CT Foundation Solutions Indemnity Co, Inc's Notice of Compliance
  38. SECOND REQUEST FOR EXTENSION
  39. SECOND REQUEST FOR EXTENSION
  40. Reply to Gregorio's Concrete, LLC's Special Defenses - Docket No. 153.00
  41. Defendant Nadeau Brothers Concrete LLC's Answer and Special Defenses to Second Amended Complaint
  42. and Special Defenses to Second Amended Complaint
  43. DiCioccio's Answer and Special Defenses to Pltf's Second Amended Complaint
  44. Payne Construction to 2nd Amended Complaint
  45. Defendant DiCioccio's Notice of Service of Requests for Admissions to Plaintiffs and Defendant H-Con
  46. Reply to Nadeau Brothers Concrete, LLC's, Special Defenses - Entry No. 161.00
  47. Reply to H-Con, LLC's, Special Defenses - Entry No. 162.00
  48. of H-Con, LLC with Dicioccio Property Services, LLC's Request for Admissions
  49. Plaintiffs' Revised Complaint
  50. Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff's Revised Apportionment Complaint
  51. Plaintiffs' Non-Standard Interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents
  52. Appearance for Non-Party Witness, CT Foundation Solutions Indemnity Co, Inc.
  53. Reply to DiCioccio Property Services, LLC's, Special Defenses - Entry No. 163.00
  54. Richard Chick
  55. of Compliance with Plaintiff's Discovery Requests dated 4.19.22
  56. to Revised Apportionment Complaint
  57. to Second Amended Complaint
  58. Reply to Chick Special Defenses - Entry No. 185.00
  59. Modified Scheduling Order
  60. Objection to Plaintiff's First Set of Interrogatories and Requests for Production
  61. of Supplemental Compliance with Pltff's Disc Req
  62. of Richard Chick d/b/a Richard Chick Masonry
  63. DiCioccio's Answer to Revised Apportionment Complaint
  64. Notice of Compliance with Plaintiff's First Set of Interrogatories to Def Payne Construction
  65. Richard Chick
  66. to Continue the Pretrial Conference on 5/1/23
  67. Modified Scheduling Order, By Agreement
  68. RE: Pleading No. 105.00

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more