Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Kern Co Non Criminal Court

Court

Kern Co Non Criminal Court

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-10-11
Status Judgment
Type 09 Cl <10 K Rule 3.740 Collections
Docket 23 entries
Disposition Judgment entered

Parties

Plaintiff Citibank N.a.
Defendant Apusen, Celestine L
Photo of Hon. Khoury Anthony S

Judge

Hon. Khoury Anthony S

Kern County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Comment FOR CELESTINE L APUSEN
  2. Comment Request for Dismissal per 664.6
  3. Comment AGREEMENT JURISDICTION RETAINED UNDER CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 664.6
  4. View Document Ruling 12/14/2022
  5. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  6. Result Ruling
  7. Judicial Officer Robertson, Murray J.
  8. Comment ON SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND STIPULATION JURISDICTION RETAINED UNDER CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 664.6
  9. Comment OF INTENTION TO REQUEST ENTRY OF JUDGMENT UNDER STIPULATION
  10. Comment Re: Default Under Stipulation
  11. Judicial Officer Robertson, Murray J.
  12. Judicial Officer Robertson, Murray J.
  13. Comment RETURNED VIA E-FILE
  14. View Document Notice of OSC re 3.740(d) (N21)
  15. Judicial Officer Green, Kenneth R., Jr.
  16. Hearing Time 1:30 PM
  17. Cancel Reason Proof Of Service Filed
  18. Judicial Officer Green, Kenneth R., Jr.
  19. Hearing Time 1:30 PM
  20. Cancel Reason Judgment Entered
  21. View Document Notice of OSC re 3.740(f) (N23F)
  22. Judicial Officer Robertson, Murray J.
  23. Hearing Time 1:30 PM

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more