Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Kern Co Non Criminal Court

Court

Kern Co Non Criminal Court

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-02-02
Status Judgment
Type 22 Cl >10 K <25 K Auto Civil Limited
Docket 103 entries
Disposition Notice of Entry of Judgment

Parties

Plaintiff Amco Insurance Company, An Iowa Corporation
Defendant Aguirre, Lizzet | Ruiz, Gustavo Mendoza
Photo of Hon. Etienne, Linda S.|Non, Fast Track|Twisselman II, Kenneth C

Judge

Hon. Etienne, Linda S.|Non, Fast Track|Twisselman II, Kenneth C

Kern County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C)
  2. Comment Re: 3.110 Hearing Date: 05/23/2022 Hearing Time: 8:30 AM Hearing Department/Division: L
  3. Served 03/02/20227:01 AM
  4. Served 03/02/20227:01 AM
  5. Comment as to Lizzet Aguirre aka Lizzet Mendoza aka Liz Mendoza, via sub service
  6. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice
  7. Comment re; Proof of Service
  8. Comment as to Gustavo Mendoza AKA Gustavo Mendozaruiz AKA Gustavo M. Mendoza AKA Gustavo R. Mendoza, via personal service
  9. Comment Without prejudice as to Does 1-10
  10. Comment DECLARATION RE E-FILING FEES 1033.5
  11. Comment DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF INTERST
  12. Comment DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF JUDGMENT
  13. Comment As to Lizzet Aguirre aka Lizzet Mendoza aka Liz Mendoza ; Gustavo Mendoza Ruiz aka Gustavo Mendozaruiz aka Gustavo M Mendoza aka Gustavo R Mendoza on complaint filed 2/2/22
  14. Comment SERVICE OF STATEMENT OF DAMAGES for Lizzet Aguirre
  15. Comment SERVICE OF STATEMENT OF DAMAGES FOR Gustavo Mendoza
  16. Comment DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT
  17. Comment DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT 585d
  18. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice
  19. Comment Judgment defendants named on 5a are not a party to the action; also missing Statement of Damages filed separately
  20. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C)
  21. Judicial Officer Etienne, Linda S.
  22. Hearing Time 8:30 AM
  23. Cancel Reason Proof Of Service Filed
  24. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice
  25. Comment TO: Jay Smith, attorney RE: Judgment REASON: Statement of Damages have not been filed separately defendant name as listed in #5a and #7 does not fully conform to the Complaint (see spacing of characters)
  26. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice
  27. Comment RE: Plaintiff Case Management Statement; incomplete as to #20
  28. Comment Plaintiff
  29. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C)
  30. View Document Case Management Conference 08/03/2022
  31. Judicial Officer Cervantes, Gina M.
  32. Hearing Time 8:30 AM
  33. Result Held
  34. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice
  35. Comment RE: Case Management Statement; Division L is located at 1215 Truxtun Ave, Bakersfield, Ca. 93301. Please correct and resubmit.
  36. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice
  37. Comment Hearing location is incorrect. Division L is located at 1215 Truxtun Ave.
  38. Comment Notice of Case Management Conference
  39. View Document Case Management Conference 10/03/2022
  40. Judicial Officer Cervantes, Gina M.
  41. Hearing Time 8:30 AM
  42. Result Held
  43. Comment cont'd: 8/3/22
  44. Comment Notice of Case Management Conference 12/05/2022, 8:30 a.m., Div. L
  45. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice
  46. Comment RE: Case Management Statement; The court address is incorrect. Please review
  47. Original Type Ruling
  48. View Document Ruling 11/07/2022
  49. Hearing Time 08:30 AM
  50. Result Ruling
  51. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice
  52. Comment RE: Case Management Statement; The court address is incorrect. Please review.
  53. Comment 12/08/22 Case Management Statement
  54. Comment Notice of service of statement of damages
  55. Comment Notice of service of statement of damages
  56. View Document Case Management Conference 12/08/2022
  57. Judicial Officer Cervantes, Gina M.
  58. Hearing Time 8:30 AM
  59. Result Held
  60. Comment Cont'd from 8/3/22; 10/3/22
  61. Comment Unable to Serve Statement of Damages
  62. Comment Proof of Service of Statement of Damages; Gustavo Mendoza Ruiz
  63. Comment Affidavit of non service of Statement of damages; Lizzet Aguirre
  64. Comment Notice of Case Management Conference hearing Cont'd to 2/06/23, 8:30 a.m. Div. L
  65. View Document Case Management Conference 02/06/2023
  66. Judicial Officer Cervantes, Gina M.
  67. Hearing Time 8:30 AM
  68. Result Continued - Party's Motion Hearing
  69. Comment Cont'd from 8/3/22, 10/3/22, 11/7/22, 12/8/22
  70. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice
  71. Comment Case management statement;Hearing information is incorrect. The case management conference hearing is scheduled as follows: Date April 11, 2023, Time 8:30 a.m. , Division L.
  72. Comment April 11, 2023 Case Management Conference
  73. Comment of Unsuccessful Service as to Lizzet Aguirre aka Lizzet Mendoza aka Liz Mendoza
  74. View Document Case Management Conference 04/11/2023
  75. Judicial Officer Cervantes, Gina M.
  76. Hearing Time 8:30 AM
  77. Result Continued - Party's Motion Hearing
  78. Comment Cont'd from 8/3/22, 10/3/22, 11/7/22, 12/8/22, 02/06/23
  79. Comment Case Management Statement 5/11/2023 8:30 a.m. Division L
  80. Comment Notice of Hearing - Case management conference
  81. View Document Case Management Conference 04/11/2023
  82. View Document Case Management Conference 05/11/2023
  83. Judicial Officer Cervantes, Gina M.
  84. Hearing Time 8:30 AM
  85. Result Continued - Party's Motion Hearing
  86. Comment Cont'd from 8/3/22, 10/3/22, 11/7/22, 12/8/22, 02/06/23, 04/11/23
  87. Comment Statement of Damages
  88. Comment Amended as to Lizzet Mendoza aka Liz Mewndoza and Gustavo Mendoza Ruiz aka Gustavo Mendozaruiz aka Gustavo M Mendoza aka Gustavo R Mendoza on complaint filed 2/2/22
  89. Comment DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF INTEREST
  90. Comment DECLARATION RE E-FILING FEES
  91. Comment Michael Glenn 585D PASSENGER
  92. Comment 585D CLIENT Brandi Daniels
  93. Comment 585D Renee Lorraine Glenn
  94. Judicial Officer Cervantes, Gina M.
  95. Comment Against Lizzet Aguirre aka Lizzet Mendoza aka Liz Mendoza and Gustavo Mendoza Ruiz aka Gustavo Mendozaruiz aka Gustavo M Mendoza aka Gustavo R Mendoza
  96. Comment Notice of Entry of Judgment
  97. Judicial Officer Cervantes, Gina M.
  98. Hearing Time 8:30 AM
  99. Cancel Reason Clerical Error
  100. Comment Cont'd from 8/3/22, 10/3/22, 11/7/22, 12/8/22, 02/06/23, 04/11/23, 05/11/23
  101. Judicial Officer Cervantes, Gina M.
  102. Hearing Time 8:30 AM
  103. Cancel Reason Judgment Entered

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more