Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-10-02
Status INACTIVE
Type Consumer Debt
Docket 45 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Discover Bank
Defendant Nicholas W Rogerson
Photo of Hon. DEENA R CALABRESE

Judge

Hon. DEENA R CALABRESE

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED: COMPLAINT
  2. JUDGMENT ENTRY(54033370) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: NICHOLAS W ROGERSON 5620 GREAT NORTHERN BLVD APT C2 NORTH OLMSTED, OH 44070
  3. JUDGMENT ENTRY(54033369) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: DAVID MULLEN [email protected]
  4. JUDGMENT ENTRY(54033368) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: DAVID MULLEN [email protected]
  5. PURSUANT TO CIVIL RULE 4(E) AND THE COURT'S 04/30/2024 JOURNAL ENTRY, CASE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND OTHERWISE THAN UPON THE MERITS FOR FAILURE OF SERVICE. FINAL. COURT COST ASSESSED TO THE PLAINTIFF(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  6. PLAINTIFF REISSUED SERVICE ON OR ABOUT 04/08/2024. THE DOCKET REFLECTS THAT THIS ATTEMPTED CERTIFIED MAIL SERVICE WAS RETURNED "NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED" ON OR ABOUT 04/17/2024. PURSUANT TO CIVIL RULE 4(E), PLAINTIFF HAS 6 MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF THE FILING OF THE COMPLAINT TO PERFECT SERVICE ON ALL DEFENDANTS. THOSE SIX MONTHS HAVE COME AND GONE. PLAINTIFF HAS UNTIL AND INCLUDING FRIDAY, 06/07/2024 TO PERFECT SERVICE. FAILURE TO DO SO WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF ANY DEFENDANTS THAT HAVE NOT BEEN SERVED. NOTICE ISSUED
  7. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 53496801 RETURNED 04/10/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT ROGERSON/NICHOLAS /W - NOT DELIVRBL AS ADDR NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  8. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 53496801 RETURNED 4/10/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT ROGERSON/NICHOLAS /W - UNABLE TO FORWARD NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  9. SUMS COMPLAINT(53496801) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: NICHOLAS W ROGERSON 125 TEAL STREET NORTH RIDGEVILLE, OH 44039-0000
  10. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  11. WRIT FEE
  12. REQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED CERTIFIED MAIL
  13. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, FILED 12/12/2023, IS MOOT. IN ORDER TO ENSURE THAT DEFENDANT RECEIVES PROPER NOTICE OF ANY DEFAULT PROCEEDINGS, A SEPARATE ENTRY HAS BEEN DOCKETED THAT BOTH SCHEDULES A NEW DEFAULT HEARING AND DIRECTS PLAINTIFF TO FILE A NEW MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT. NOTICE ISSUED
  14. DEFAULT HEARING SET FOR 04/30/2024 AT 08:30 AM. NON-ORAL DEFAULT HEARING SCHEDULED FOR THE DATE AND TIME REFERENCED ABOVE. DO NOT APPEAR AT THE COURTHOUSE FOR THE NON-ORAL HEARING. PLAINTIFF IS DIRECTED TO FILE A RULE 55 MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT NO LATER THAN MONDAY, 04/08/2024. PLAINTIFF IS ALSO ORDERED TO FILE, ALONG WITH THE MOTION, AN AFFIDAVIT OF DAMAGES, A MILITARY AFFIDAVIT, A SERVICE AFFIDAVIT, AND ANY OTHER EVIDENTIARY MATERIALS NECESSARY TO SUPPORT THE MOTION. PLAINTIFF MUST ALSO SUBMIT A PROPOSED JOURNAL ENTRY. THE PROPOSED ENTRY MUST BE SUBMITTED AS A PROPOSED ORDER IN MS WORD FORMAT, NOT FILED ON THE DOCKET AS A PDF. IF NECESSARY, COUNSEL SHOULD CONSULT THE E-FILING USER MANUAL OR CONTACT THE E-FILING HELP DESK. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS COURT ORDER CAN RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE, WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE, FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. DEFENDANT WILL HAVE UNTIL AND INCLUDING THURSDAY, 04/25/2024 TO FILE A RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION. NON-ORAL HEARING WILL BE HELD TUESDAY, 04/30/2024. NO EXTENSIONS WILL BE GIVEN. COUNSEL AND PARTIES ARE NOT TO APPEAR AT THE COURTHOUSE FOR THE NON-ORAL HEARING. NOTICE ISSUED
  15. SUMS COMPLAINT(53146551) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: NICHOLAS W ROGERSON 7346 SONGBIRD LN NORTH RIDGEVILLE, OH 44039-0000 ANSWER DATE: 03/25/2024
  16. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  17. WRIT FEE
  18. REQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED VIA REGULAR MAIL
  19. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 52694913 RETURNED 1/22/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT ROGERSON/NICHOLAS /W - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  20. DEFAULT HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 01/09/2024 IS CANCELED. REASON: SERVICE OF PROCESS ISSUED TO NEW ADDRESS ON OR ABOUT 01/03/2024. NOTICE ISSUED
  21. DEFAULT HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 01/09/2024 AT 08:30 AM IS CANCELLED.
  22. SUMS COMPLAINT(52694913) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: NICHOLAS W ROGERSON 7346 SONGBIRD LN NORTH RIDGEVILLE, OH 44039-0000
  23. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  24. WRIT FEE
  25. REQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED VIA CERTIFIED MAIL
  26. NOTICE FILED BY P1 DISCOVER BANK ATTORNEY DAVID MULLEN 0089053 NOTICE OF SUBMISSION, DEFAULT LETTER
  27. AFFIDAVIT FILED BY P1 DISCOVER BANK ATTORNEY DAVID MULLEN 0089053 MILITARY SERVICE
  28. MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT 04/01/2024 - MOOT
  29. DEFAULT HEARING SET FOR 01/09/2024 AT 08:30 AM. NON-ORAL DEFAULT HEARING SCHEDULED FOR THE DATE AND TIME REFERENCED ABOVE. DO NOT APPEAR AT THE COURTHOUSE FOR THE NON-ORAL HEARING. PLAINTIFF IS DIRECTED TO FILE A RULE 55 MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT NO LATER THAN FRIDAY, 12/15/2023. PLAINTIFF IS ALSO ORDERED TO FILE, ALONG WITH THE MOTION, AN AFFIDAVIT OF DAMAGES, A MILITARY AFFIDAVIT, A SERVICE AFFIDAVIT, AND ANY OTHER EVIDENTIARY MATERIALS NECESSARY TO SUPPORT THE MOTION. PLAINTIFF MUST ALSO SUBMIT A PROPOSED JOURNAL ENTRY. THE PROPOSED ENTRY MUST BE SUBMITTED AS A PROPOSED ORDER IN MS WORD FORMAT, NOT FILED ON THE DOCKET AS A PDF. IF NECESSARY, COUNSEL SHOULD CONSULT THE E-FILING USER MANUAL OR CONTACT THE E-FILING HELP DESK. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS COURT ORDER CAN RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE, WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE, FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. DEFENDANT WILL HAVE UNTIL AND INCLUDING WEDNESDAY, 01/03/2024 TO FILE A RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION. NON-ORAL HEARING WILL BE HELD TUESDAY, 01/09/2024. NO EXTENSIONS WILL BE GIVEN. COUNSEL AND PARTIES ARE NOT TO APPEAR AT THE COURTHOUSE FOR THE NON-ORAL HEARING. NOTICE ISSUED
  30. SUMS COMPLAINT(52234581) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: NICHOLAS W ROGERSON 5620 GREAT NORTHERN BLVD APT C2 NORTH OLMSTED, OH 44070 ANSWER DATE: 11/27/2023
  31. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  32. WRIT FEE
  33. REQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED VIA REGULAR MAIL
  34. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 52030670 RETURNED 10/23/2023 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT ROGERSON/NICHOLAS /W - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  35. SUMS COMPLAINT(52030670) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: NICHOLAS W ROGERSON 5620 GREAT NORTHERN BLVD APT C2 NORTH OLMSTED, OH 44070
  36. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  37. WRIT FEE
  38. JUDGE DEENA R CALABRESE ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  39. LEGAL RESEARCH
  40. LEGAL NEWS
  41. LEGAL AID
  42. COURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  43. COMPUTER FEE
  44. CLERK'S FEE
  45. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID DAVID MULLEN

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more