Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Las Cruces

Court

Las Cruces

New Mexico

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-09-29
Status CLS: JUDGMENT/ DISPOSITION
Type Mandamus Prohibition
Docket 45 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Hays Michael L
Defendant City Of Las Cruces
Photo of Hon. Martin James T

Judge

Hon. Martin James T

Dona Ana County (NM)

New Mexico

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. PN: PETITION
  2. RD: ORDER
  3. TN: MOTION
  4. RD: ORDER
  5. TN: MOTION
  6. RD: ORDER GRANTING
  7. TN: MOTION/ PETITION TO EXTEND TIME
  8. RIEF
  9. ERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
  10. RD: SCHEDULING/PRETRIAL ORDER
  11. RD: ORDER GRANTING
  12. UDIO LOG NOTES
  13. RD: ORDER DENYING
  14. EPLY
  15. ESPONSE
  16. TC: HEARING
  17. NSWER
  18. TN: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
  19. TC: COMPLETION OF BRIEFING
  20. TC: COMPLETION OF BRIEFING
  21. MENDED PETITION
  22. EPLY
  23. MENDED PETITION
  24. EMORANDUM BRIEF
  25. ESPONSE
  26. RIEF
  27. BJECTION/OPPOSITION
  28. RD: ORDER
  29. TN: TO RECONSIDER/ REVIEW
  30. ERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
  31. NSWER
  32. RD: ORDER DENYING
  33. RIT ISSUED
  34. XHIBIT RECEIPT
  35. MENDED COMPLAINT
  36. UDIO LOG NOTES
  37. EMORANDUM BRIEF
  38. TN: TO DISMISS
  39. EQUEST FOR HEARING/ SETTING
  40. TC: HEARING
  41. EQUEST FOR HEARING/ SETTING
  42. ERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
  43. NTRY OF APPEARANCE
  44. CM (Differentiated Case Management) Scheduling Order

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more