Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-09-27
Status INACTIVE
Type Certificate For Qualification Of Employment
Docket 12 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Laneice Robinson
Photo of Hon. SHIRLEY STRICKLAND SAFFOLD

Judge

Hon. SHIRLEY STRICKLAND SAFFOLD

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFICATION OF EMPLOYMENT PETITION FILED
  2. JUDGMENT ENTRY(52875915) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: LANEICE ROBINSON 1802 E. 13TH STREET UNIT 406 CLEVELAND, OH 44114-0000
  3. PETITIONER LANEICE ROBINSON'S PETITION FOR CERTIFICATE FOR QUALIFICATION FOR EMPLOYMENT IS WELL-TAKEN, UNOPPOSED AND HEREBY GRANTED. THE COURT FINDS THAT PETITIONER ROBINSON HAS MET ALL REQUIREMENTS AND THE STATE HAS WAIVED THE RIGHT TO BE HEARD. FINAL. IT IS SO ORDERED. COURT COST ASSESSED AS DIRECTED. PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  4. RESPONSE TO CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFIED EMPLOYMENT
  5. JUDGMENT ENTRY(52450883) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: LANEICE ROBINSON 1802 E. 13TH STREET UNIT 406 CLEVELAND, OH 44114-0000
  6. HEARING SET FOR 01/09/2024 AT 10:00 AM. IN-PERSON HEARING SET ON PETITIONER'S APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATION OF QUALIFICATION FOR EMPLOYMENT. ALL PARTIES ARE REQUIRED TO BE PRESENT, IN PERSON IN COURTROOM 21-B, AT THE SCHEDULED DATE AND TIME. FAILURE TO APPEAR WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. IN THE EVENT THE COURT ISSUES A RULING ON THE PETITION PRIOR TO THE HEARING DATE, THE HEARING WILL NOT GO FORWARD. IT IS SO ORDERED. CLERK TO SEND A COPY OF THIS ENTRY TO THE PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER AND TO THE PROSECUTORS OFFICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  7. THE PROBATION DEPARTMENT IS ORDERED TO COMPLETE A CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFICATION OF EMPLOYMENT INVESTIGATION FOR THE PETITIONER. PLEASE DELIVER TO THE STAFF ATTORNEY JC-FLOOR 11 OR [email protected]. NOTICE ISSUED
  8. UPON THE REQUEST OF THE PLAINTIFF AND THE COURT'S REVIEW, THE COURT FINDS THAT THE PLAINTIFF IS AN INDIGENT LITIGANT AND GRANTS A WAIVER OF THE PREPAYMENT OF COSTS OR FEES IN THIS MATTER. PURSUANT TO R.C. 2323.311(B)(3), UPON THE FILING OF A CIVIL ACTION OR PROCEEDING AND THE AFFIDAVIT OF INDIGENCY UNDER DIVISION (B)(1) OF THIS SECTION, THE CLERK OF THE COURT SHALL ACCEPT THE ACTION, MOTION, OR PROCEEDING FOR FILING. NOTICE ISSUED
  9. JUDGE SHIRLEY STRICKLAND SAFFOLD ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  10. CQE APPLICATION FEE, ORC 2953.25
  11. AFFIDAVIT OF INDIGENCY, FILED
  12. CASE FILED

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more