Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-09-26
Status INACTIVE
Type Consumer Debt
Docket 31 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Bank Of America, N.a.
Defendant Sisina Wilson
Photo of Hon. DANIEL GAUL

Judge

Hon. DANIEL GAUL

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED: COMPLAINT, SERVICE REQUEST
  2. JUDGMENT ENTRY(54922867) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: SISINA WILSON 17007 VAN AKEN BLVD APT 202 CLEVELAND, OH 44120
  3. JUDGMENT ENTRY(54922866) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: W. ANDERSON WOODFORD [email protected]
  4. JUDGMENT ENTRY(54922865) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: MEGAN JANELLE URBAN [email protected]
  5. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, FILED 07/31/2024, IS UNOPPOSED AND GRANTED. PURSUANT TO CIV. R. 56, SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS APPROPRIATE WHEN (1) THERE IS NO GENUINE ISSUE OF MATERIAL FACT, (2) THE MOVING PARTY IS ENTITLED TO JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW, AND (3) REASONABLE MINDS CAN COME TO BUT ONE CONCLUSION, AND THAT CONCLUSION IS ADVERSE TO THE NONMOVING PARTY, THAT PARTY BEING ENTITLED TO HAVE THE EVIDENCE CONSTRUED MOST STRONGLY IN HIS FAVOR. HORTON V. HARWICK CHEM. CORP, 73 OHIO ST.3D 679, 1995-OHIO-286, 653 N.E.2D 1196, PARAGRAPH THREE OF THE SYLLABUS (OHIO 1995). THE PARTY MOVING FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BEARS THE BURDEN OF SHOWING THAT THERE IS NO GENUINE ISSUE OF MATERIAL FACT AND THAT HE IS ENTITLED TO JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW. DRESHER V. BURT, 75 OHIO ST.3D 280, 292-293, 1996-OHIO-107, 662 N.E.2D 264, 273-274 (OHIO 1996). "ONCE THE MOVING PARTY SATISFIES ITS BURDEN, THE NONMOVING PARTY 'MAY NOT REST UPON THE MERE ALLEGATIONS OR DENIALS OF THE PARTY'S PLEADINGS, BUT THE PARTY'S RESPONSE, BY AFFIDAVIT OR AS OTHERWISE PROVIDED IN THIS RULE, MUST SET FORTH SPECIFIC FACTS SHOWING THAT THERE IS A GENUINE ISSUE FOR TRIAL.' CIV. R. 56(E); MOOTISPAW V. ECKSTEIN, 76 OHIO ST.3D 383, 385, 667 N.E.2D 1197 (1996). DOUBTS MUST BE RESOLVED IN FAVOR OF THE NON-MOVING PARTY. MURPHY V. REYNOLDSBURG, 65 OHIO ST.3D 356, 358-359, 604 N.E.2D 138 (1992).'" COLLIER V. LIBATIONS LOUNGE, LLC., 8TH DIST. CUYAHOGA NO. 97504, 2012-OHIO-2390, 7. THE COURT NOTES THAT PLAINTIFF HAS PROVIDED EVIDENCE IN THE FORM OF AFFIDAVITS AND EXHIBITS ATTACHED TO ITS MOTION, WHICH ESTABLISHED THAT THERE ARE NO GENUINE ISSUES OF MATERIAL FACT THAT DEFENDANT IS INDEBTED TO PLAINTFF. DEFENDANT HAS NOT FILED A REPSONSE TO THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND THEREFORE FAILED TO ALLEGE DISPUTED GENUINE ISSUES OF MATERIAL FACT THAT PRECLUDE A GRANT OF SUMMARY JUDGMENT. ACCORDINGLY, PLAINTIFF IS GRANTED JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW AGAINST DEFENDANT, SISINA WILSON IN THE AMOUNT OF $16,314.21 PLUS COSTS. COURT COST ASSESSED TO THE DEFENDANT(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. THIS ENTRY TAKEN BY JUDGE TIMOTHY J MCGINTY. NOTICE ISSUED
  6. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE ANSWER INSTANTER MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT INSTANTER, FILED 07/31/2024, IS UNOPPOSED AND GRANTED. THIS ENTRY TAKEN BY JUDGE TIMOTHY J MCGINTY. NOTICE ISSUED
  7. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 09/27/2024 - UNOPPOSED AND GRANTED
  8. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE ANSWER INSTANTER MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT INSTANTER 08/22/2024 - UNOPPOSED AND GRANTED
  9. STATUS CONFERENCE HELD 7/30/24. COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF PRESENT. DEFENDANT FAILED TO APPEAR OR OTHERWISE CONTACT THE COURT. PLAINTIFF TO FILE A MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUMMARY JUDGMENT FORTHWITH. THIS ENTRY TAKEN BY JUDGE TIMOTHY J MCGINTY. NOTICE ISSUED
  10. STATUS CONFERENCE SET FOR 07/30/2024 AT 10:00 AM. COUNSEL FOR ALL PARTIES SHALL APPEAR BY PHONE. PARTIES NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL SHALL LIKEWISE APPEAR BY PHONE. ALL PARTICIPANTS SHALL CALL THE CONFERENCE NUMBER (978) 990-5135 AND ENTER ACCESS CODE 4088405# AT THE SCHEDULED TIME. ALL PARTICIPANTS SHALL BE PREPARED TO DISCUSS THE FACTS OF THE CASE, DISCOVERY PROGRESS, AND SCHEDULING MATTERS. DISPOSITIVE MOTION CUTOFF: 5/3/2024 OPPOSITION BRIEFS DUE: 6/3/2024 REPLY BRIEFS DUE: 6/17/2024 IT IS SO ORDERED. THIS ENTRY TAKEN BY JUDGE JANET R BURNSIDE. NOTICE ISSUED
  11. STATUS CONFERENCE SET FOR 03/26/2024 AT 09:30 AM. COUNSEL FOR ALL PARTIES SHALL APPEAR BY PHONE. PARTIES NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL SHALL LIKEWISE APPEAR BY PHONE. ALL PARTICIPANTS SHALL CALL THE CONFERENCE NUMBER (978) 990-5135 AND ENTER ACCESS CODE 4088405# AT THE SCHEDULED TIME. ALL PARTICIPANTS SHALL BE PREPARED TO DISCUSS THE FACTS OF THE CASE, DISCOVERY PROGRESS, AND SCHEDULING MATTERS. THIS ENTRY TAKEN BY JUDGE JANET R BURNSIDE. NOTICE ISSUED
  12. SCHEDULE ATTORNEY NOTICE. NOTICE GENERATED FOR WILSON/SISINA / 02/05/2024 17:00:56
  13. SCHEDULE ATTORNEY NOTICE. NOTICE GENERATED FOR URBAN/MEGAN/JANELLE 02/05/2024 17:00:56
  14. CMC BY PHONE SET FOR 02/27/2024 AT 11:30 AM. COUNSEL FOR ALL PARTIES SHALL APPEAR BY PHONE. PARTIES NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL SHALL LIKEWISE APPEAR BY PHONE. ALL PARTICIPANTS SHALL CALL THE CONFERENCE NUMBER (978) 990-5135 AND ENTER ACCESS CODE 4088405# AT THE SCHEDULED TIME. ALL PARTICIPANTS SHALL BE PREPARED TO DISCUSS THE FACTS OF THE CASE, DISCOVERY PROGRESS, AND SCHEDULING MATTERS.
  15. ANSWER FILED BY DEFENDANT FILED. PRO SE (9999999)
  16. PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR 20 ADDITIONAL DAYS TO FILE AN ANSWER IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFF IS GRANTED LEAVE TO ANSWER THROUGH 1/5/2024. IT IS SO ORDERED. NOTICE ISSUED
  17. . DEFENDANT'S REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL TIME IN WHICH TO ANSWER OR RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT FILED PRO SE (9999999)
  18. DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR ADDITIONAL TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT IS GRANTED. DEFENDANT SHALL FILE AN ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT ON OR BEFORE 12/15/2023. IT IS SO ORDERED. NOTICE ISSUED
  19. DEFENDANT'S REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL TIME IN WHICH TO ANSWER OR RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT, FILED
  20. USPS RECEIPT NO. 51983475 DELIVERED BY USPS 09/30/2023 WILSON/SISINA / PROCESSED BY COC 10/04/2023.
  21. SUMS COMPLAINT(51983475) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: SISINA WILSON 17007 VAN AKEN BLVD APT 202 CLEVELAND, OH 44120
  22. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  23. WRIT FEE
  24. JUDGE DANIEL GAUL ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  25. LEGAL RESEARCH
  26. LEGAL NEWS
  27. LEGAL AID
  28. COURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  29. COMPUTER FEE
  30. CLERK'S FEE
  31. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID MEGAN JANELLE URBAN

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more