Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Arkansas Unified County

Court

Arkansas Unified County

Arkansas

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2021-11-18
Status CLOSED - CASE CLOSED
Type Ap Administrative Appeal
Docket 155 entries

Parties

Plaintiff David's Burgers Bowman, Co. Dba David's Burgers Bowman Llc|Grooms, Kendel W
Defendant Scott Jr, Frank|Jones, Alan W|Spaulding, Parker Lee|Green, Kristen C|Carpenter, Thomas M|Jones, Alan W|City Of Little Rock, Arkansas
Photo of Hon. HON. MACKIE M. PIERCE - 17TH DIVISION 6TH CIRCUIT

Judge

Hon. HON. MACKIE M. PIERCE - 17TH DIVISION 6TH CIRCUIT

Arkansas County (AR)

Arkansas

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. AOC COVERSHEET CIVIL
  2. none.
  3. No Images
  4. COMPLAINT/PETITION FILED $
  5. none.
  6. WEB
  7. SUMMONS FEE 21-6-402 $
  8. none.
  9. No Images
  10. SUMMONS FEE 21-6-402 $
  11. none.
  12. No Images
  13. SUMMONS ISSUED
  14. CITY OF LITTLE ROCK
  15. WEB
  16. SUMMONS ISSUED
  17. FRANK SCOTT, JR., MAYOR OF LITTLE ROCK
  18. WEB
  19. MOF ORIGINAL
  20. none.
  21. No Images
  22. PAYMENT RECEIVED
  23. A Payment of $170.00 was made on receipt 60CI440245.
  24. No Images
  25. AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
  26. ON FRANK SCOTT 12-14-21 BY SERVING BRIDGETTE NEWSOM
  27. WEB
  28. AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
  29. ON THE CITY OF LITTLE ROCK 12-14-21 BY SERVING BRIDGETT NEWSOM
  30. WEB
  31. MOTION EXTENSION OF TIME
  32. MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE CERTIFIED RECORD
  33. WEB
  34. FILING - OTHER
  35. CERTIFIED RECORD OF ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
  36. WEB
  37. EFILING NOTICE OF APPEARANCE
  38. none.
  39. No Images
  40. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE
  41. Entry of Appearance - Kristen C. Green
  42. WEB
  43. ANSWER FILED
  44. Answer of the City of City of Little Rock and Frank Scott, Jr., in his official capacity of Mayor of the City of Little Rock
  45. WEB
  46. NOTICE OF HEARING
  47. AND TRIAL
  48. WEB
  49. ORDER OTHER
  50. REGARDING PROTOCOLS FOR ZOOM HEARINGS
  51. WEB
  52. NOTICE OF APPEAL
  53. AMENDED
  54. WEB
  55. REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS
  56. TO CITY OF LITTLE ROCK - FIRST SET
  57. WEB
  58. ANSWER FILED
  59. none.
  60. WEB
  61. RESPONSE TO REQ FOR ADMISSIONS
  62. none.
  63. WEB
  64. MOTION INTERVENE
  65. none.
  66. WEB
  67. NOTICE OF DEPOSITION
  68. none.
  69. WEB
  70. NOTICE OF DEPOSITION
  71. none.
  72. WEB
  73. RESPONSE TO MOTION FILED
  74. RESPONSE TO MOTION TO INTERVENE
  75. WEB
  76. PRE-TRIAL HEARING HELD
  77. none.
  78. No Images
  79. ORDER OTHER
  80. DENYING SOUTH BOWMAN, LLC'S MOTION FOR INTERVENTIONS
  81. WEB
  82. PRE-TRIAL HEARING CONTINUED
  83. TO APRIL 14, 2022 AT 2:30 PM
  84. No Images
  85. PRE-TRIAL HEARING HELD
  86. none.
  87. No Images
  88. MOTION SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  89. none.
  90. WEB
  91. BRIEF IN SUPPORT
  92. OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  93. WEB
  94. TRIAL CANCELLED
  95. none.
  96. No Images
  97. TRIAL CANCELLED
  98. none.
  99. No Images
  100. RESPONSE TO MOTION FILED
  101. none.
  102. WEB
  103. BRIEF IN SUPPORT
  104. none.
  105. WEB
  106. REPLY BRIEF
  107. IN SUPPORT OF APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  108. WEB
  109. JUDGMENT-SUMMARY
  110. none.
  111. WEB
  112. MOD JUDGMENT/DECREE/ORDER
  113. TRIAL TYPE: N
  114. No Images

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more