Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Mahoning County

Court

Mahoning County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-03-31
Status CLOSED
Type Civil Austintown
Docket 26 entries
Disposition judgment

Parties

Plaintiff Midland Credit Management, Inc.
Defendant Zaken, Roger L
Photo of Hon. Hunter Scott D

Judge

Hon. Hunter Scott D

Mahoning County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. $0.00
  2. Issue Date: 03/31/2023 Service: SUMMONS ISSUED Method: (A) CERTIFIED MAIL Cost Per: $0.00 ZAKEN, ROGER L 4600 RHODE ISLAND DR APT 1 YOUNGSTOWN, OH 44515 Tracking No: 941472669904220364456
  3. SUCCESSFUL SERVICE Method : (A) CERTIFIED MAIL Issued : 03/31/2023 Service : SUMMONS ISSUED Served : 04/01/2023 Return : 04/03/2023 On : ZAKEN, ROGER L Signed By : ROGER LEE ZAKEN Reason : (A) SUCCESSFUL SERVICE Comment : Tracking #: 941472669904220364456
  4. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT FILED BY DEFENDANT
  5. HEARING SCHEDULED Event: CIVIL PRE TRIAL Date: 06/30/2023 Time: 9:45 am Judge: DESANTO, DONALD Location: COUNTY COURT # 4
  6. NOTICE OF CIVIL PRE TRIAL SENT TO ATTY NEVENKA PAVLOVIC AND ROGER L ZAKEN
  7. PRE-TRIAL HELD ON THE 30TH DAY OF JUNE, 2023. COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF/PLAINTIFF PRESENT. DEFENDANT PRESENT. DISCOVERY TO BE COMPLETED IN 60 DAYS. DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS, IF ANY, FILED IN 90 DAYS. TRIAL TO BENCH WITHDRAWN. SET BENCH TRIAL FOR 120 DAYS /S/ MAGISTRATE DONALD J DESANTO
  8. HEARING SCHEDULED-CONTINUED Event: CIVIL TRIAL Date: 10/27/2023 Time: 11:30 am Judge: DESANTO, DONALD Location: COUNTY COURT # 4 Result: CONTINUED
  9. NOTICE OF CIVIL TRIAL SENT TO ATTORNEY AND DEFENDANT BY REGULAR MAIL
  10. MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE AND LEAVE TO FILE A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED BY Attorney: PAVLOVIC, NEVENKA (72697)
  11. PER MAGISTRATE: CONTINUANCE GRANTED.
  12. ENTRY: THIS CASE CAME ON FOR CONSIDERATION UPON THE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE AND FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. THE COURT FINDS SAID MOTION TO BE WELL TAKEN, AND IT IS THEREFORE GRANTED. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, THAT PLAINTIFF IS HEREBY GIVEN LEAVE TO FILE ITS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, THAT THE TRIAL CURRENTLY SET FOR OCTOBER 27, 2023 IS HEREBY CONTINUED FOR 60 DAYS. /S/DJD /S/JUDGE SCOTT D HUNTER
  13. HEARING SCHEDULED-ENRY FILED/CANCELLED Event: CIVIL TRIAL Date: 01/05/2024 Time: 11:30 am Judge: DESANTO, DONALD Location: COUNTY COURT # 4 Result: JOURNAL ENTRY FILED
  14. ENTRY OF 10/23/23 AND NOTICE OF CIVIL TRIAL SENT TO ATTY NEVENKA PAVLOVIC AND ROGER ZAKEN
  15. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED BY Attorney: PAVLOVIC, NEVENKA (72697)
  16. HEARING SCHEDULED Event: NON-ORAL HEARING - MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Date: 12/15/2023 Time: 11:00 am Judge: DESANTO, DONALD Location: COUNTY COURT # 4
  17. NOTICE OF NON ORAL HEARING SENT TO ATTY NEVENKA PAVLOVIC AND ROGER L ZAKEN
  18. JUDGMENT ENTRY: THIS CASE CAME ON FOR NON-ORAL HEARING THIS 15TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023, UPON THE PLAINTFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, THE DEFENDANT HAS FILED NO RESPONSE AS PER CIVIL RULE 56 (E). THE COURT FINDS SAID MOTION TO BE WELL TAKEN, AND IT IS THEREFORE GRANTED. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, THAT PLAINTIFF IS GRANTED JUDGMENT IN ITS FAVOR AND AGAINST THE DEFENDANT, ROGER L ZAKEN, IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,634.44, INTEREST AT THE STATUTORY RATE PER ANNUM FROM THE DATE OF JUDGMENT AND COURT COSTS. /S/DJD /S/JUDGE SCOTT D HUNTER
  19. $125.00
  20. $0.00
  21. $0.00
  22. $0.00
  23. $0.00
  24. $0.00
  25. $0.00
  26. $0.00

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more