Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2023-04-10
Status Pending
Type F 6 Felony 6
Docket 46 entries

Parties

Plaintiff State Of Indiana
Defendant Russ, Scott T
Photo of Hon. Zielinski, Daniel F

Judge

Hon. Zielinski, Daniel F

Hancock County (IN)

Indiana

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Case Opened as a New Filing
  2. Case Filed Electronically
  3. Appearance Filed
  4. Notice to Court Filed
  5. Information Filed
  6. Probable Cause Affidavit Filed
  7. Hearing Scheduling Activity
  8. Probable Cause Found: Order Issued
  9. Subpoena/Summons Issued
  10. Service Issued
  11. No Contact Order Issued
  12. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties
  13. Notice Issued to Parties
  14. Service Returned Served
  15. Service Returned Served: Order of Protection
  16. Initial Hearing
  17. Hearing Scheduling Activity
  18. Hearing Scheduling Activity
  19. Hearing Journal Entry
  20. Order on Initial Hearing
  21. Indigent Counsel Appointed at County Expense
  22. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties
  23. Pretrial Conference
  24. Hearing Scheduling Activity
  25. Hearing Journal Entry
  26. Order on Hearing
  27. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties
  28. Motion Filed
  29. Information Filed
  30. Motion Filed
  31. Notice Filed
  32. Order Granting
  33. Order Granting
  34. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties
  35. Pretrial Conference
  36. Hearing Scheduling Activity
  37. Hearing Scheduling Activity
  38. Hearing Journal Entry
  39. Order on Hearing
  40. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties
  41. Motion for Continuance Filed
  42. Order Granting Motion for Continuance
  43. Hearing Scheduling Activity
  44. Hearing Scheduling Activity
  45. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties
  46. Pretrial Conference

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.