Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Oklahoma unified county

Court

Oklahoma unified county

Oklahoma

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-10-18
Type Divorce With Minor Children
Docket 89 entries
Disposition not guilty
Photo of Hon. Halley, David H

Judge

Hon. Halley, David H

Canadian County (OK)

Oklahoma

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. FAMILY AND DOMESTIC INITIAL FILING./PETITION FOR DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE//FILED
  2. DIVORCE WITH MINOR CHILDREN
  3. DISPUTE MEDIATION FEE
  4. PETITION
  5. LAW LIBRARY FEE
  6. OKLAHOMA COURT INFORMATION SYSTEM REVOLVING FUND
  7. OKLAHOMA COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
  8. OKLAHOMA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
  9. SHERIFF'S SERVICE FEE FOR COURTHOUSE SECURITY PER BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER
  10. COURT CLERK ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON COURTHOUSE SECURITY PER BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER
  11. COURT CLERK ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON $1.55 COLLECTION
  12. STATE JUDICIAL REVOLVING FUND - INTERPRETER AND TRANSLATOR SERVICES
  13. DISTRICT COURT ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON $1.55 COLLECTIONS
  14. DISTRICT COURT ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON $5 COLLECTIONS
  15. DISTRICT COURT ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON COURTHOUSE SECURITY PER BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER
  16. COURT CLERK'S RECORDS MANAGEMENT AND PRESERVATION FEE
  17. COURT CLERK ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON COLLECTIONS
  18. LENGTHY TRIAL FUND
  19. SUMMONS AND NOTICE OF AUTOMATIC TEMPORARY INJUNCTION ISSUED
  20. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE//FILED
  21. APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY ORDERS//FILED
  22. SIGNATURE PAGE FOR HAND DELIVERY OF PARENTING CLASSES//FILED
  23. OCIS HAS AUTOMATICALLY ASSIGNED JUDGE STRUBHAR, KHRISTAN K. TO THIS CASE.
  24. RECEIPT # 2022-717234 ON 10/18/2022. PAYOR: GOODWIN/LEWIS PLLC TOTAL AMOUNT PAID: $ 259.64. LINE ITEMS: FD-2022-574: $193.00 ON AC01 CLERK FEES. FD-2022-574: $6.00 ON AC23 LAW LIBRARY FEE CIVIL AND CRIMINAL. FD-2022-574: $0.66 ON AC31 COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND. FD-2022-574: $5.00 ON AC58 OKLAHOMA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES. FD-2022-574: $1.55 ON AC59 COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND. FD-2022-574: $7.00 ON AC64 DISPUTE MEDIATION FEES CIVIL ONLY. FD-2022-574: $0.45 ON AC65 STATE JUDICIAL REVOLVING FUND, INTERPRETER SVCS. FD-2022-574: $0.98 ON AC67 DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND. FD-2022-574: $25.00 ON AC79 OCIS REVOLVING FUND. FD-2022-574: $10.00 ON AC81 LENGTHY TRIAL FUND. FD-2022-574: $10.00 ON AC89 COURT CLERK'S RECORDS MANAGEMENT AND PRESERVATION FEE.
  25. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE//FILED
  26. RESPONDENT'S ANSWER TO PETITIONER'S PETITION FOR DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE AND COUTNERPETITION FOR DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE//FILED
  27. RESPONDENT'S APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY ORDER//FILED
  28. ORIGINAL SUMMONS AND NOTICE OF AUTOMATIC TEMPORARY INJUNCTION//FILED
  29. NOTICE OF HEARING//FILED
  30. RESPONSE AND OBJECTION TO COUNTERPETITION//FILED
  31. RESPONSE AND OBJECTION TO RESPONDENT'S APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY ORDER//FILED
  32. MOTION FOR DRUG TESTING/FILED
  33. ORDER APPOINTING GUARDIAN AD LITEM/FILED
  34. HANDWRITTEN COURT MINUTE//FILED
  35. CRT MIN. ATTY FOR RESPONDENT REBECCA ROSS CONTACTED THIS OFFICE AND ASKED TO STRIKE BY AGREEMENT THE REVIEW SET 2/2/2023 AT 9:00AM AND THEY WILL BE PRESENTING AN AGREED ORDER FOR JUDGE HALLEYS SIGNATURE. DEE PLUMLEY BAILIFF FOR JUDGE HALLEY
  36. CRT MIN. THE COURT IS PRESENTED WITH AN AGREED INTERIM ORDER MODIFYING TEMPORARY VISITATION SCHEDULE THE COURT RECOGNIZES THAT BOTH ATTY'S AND THE GUARDIAN AD LITEM HAVE SIGNED OFF ON THIS ORDER AND THE COURT SIGNS ACCORDINGLY. JUDGE HALLEY
  37. AGREED INTERIM ORDER MODIFYING TEMPORARY VISITATION SCHEDULE//FILED
  38. CRT MIN. THE COURT IS PRESENTED WITH AN AGREED TEMPORARY ORDER THAT HAS BEEN APPROVED BY TYLER GENTRY ATTY FOR PETITIONER AND BY REBECCA ROSS ATTY FOR THE RESPONDENT. THE COURT APPROVES THE AGREED TEMPORARY ORDERS FROM NOVEMBER 10, 2022 ALONG WITH THE ATTACHED JUDICIAL ORDER FOR PROPER CONDUCT OF PARENTS. JUDGE STRUBHAR
  39. AGREED TEMPORARY ORDERS//FILED
  40. PETITIONER'S APPLICATION FOR CONTEMPT CITATION//FILED
  41. PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND REVIEW/STATUS HEARING//FILED
  42. CRT MIN. COURT IS PRESENTED WITH AN AGREED ORDER WITH REGUARDS TO SUMMER VISITATION IN 2023. THE COURT REVIEWS THE AGREEMENT. THE COURT NOTES THAT BOTH PARTIES AND BOTH COUNSEL AND THE GUARDIAN AD LITEM HAVE ALL EXECUTED THIS AGREED ORDER. AS A RESULT, THE COURT FINDS THAT ALL IS EQUITABLE AND SIGNS THE AGREED ORDER. JUDGE HALLEY
  43. AGREED ORDER//FILED
  44. NOTICE OF HEARING//FILED
  45. MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS ATTORNEY OF RECORD/FILED
  46. RESPONDENT'S APPLICATION FOR CITATION FOR INDIRECT CONTEMPT//FILED
  47. RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO MODIFY TEMPORARY ORDERS//FILED
  48. PETITIONER'S RESPONSE AND OBJECTION TO RESPONDENT'S APPLICATION FOR CITATION FOR INDIRECT CONTEMPT/FILED
  49. PETITIONER'S RESPONSE AND OBJECTION TO RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO MODIFY TEMPORARY ORDERS//FILED
  50. SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL//FILED
  51. ORDER AND CONTEMPT CITATION ISSUED
  52. ORDER AND CITATION FOR CONTEMPT ISSUED
  53. CRT MIN. COMES ON FOR PETITIONERS APPLICATION FOR CONTEMPT AND RESPONDENTS APPLICATION FOR CONTEMPT AND RESPONDENTS MOTION TO MODIFY. THE ATTY REPRESENTING THE PETITIONER TYLER GENTRY AND THE ATTY REPRESENTING THE RESPONDENT COURTNEY SCHAMEL APPEAR BY PHONE. BOTH PARTIES WAIVE JURY TRIALS AND PLEAD NOT GUILTY. COURT AUTHORIZES AN OR BOND FOR EACH PARTY. THE TRIAL IS TO BE SET AT THE SAME TIME AS THE TRIAL ON THE MERITS.AS TO THE RESPONDENTS MOTION TO MODIFY THE TEMORARY ORDER, THAT WILL BE RESET IF NECESSARY BY AGREEMENT OF THE PARTIES. JUDGE HALLEY
  54. MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS ATTORNEY OF RECORD//FILED
  55. RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO ENFORCE VISITATION//FILED
  56. OKLAHOMA COURT INFORMATION SYSTEM REVOLVING FUND
  57. OKLAHOMA COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
  58. OKLAHOMA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
  59. COURT CLERK ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON $1.55 COLLECTION
  60. STATE JUDICIAL REVOLVING FUND - INTERPRETER AND TRANSLATOR SERVICES
  61. DISTRICT COURT ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON $1.55 COLLECTIONS
  62. DISTRICT COURT ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON $5 COLLECTIONS
  63. COURT CLERK'S RECORDS MANAGEMENT AND PRESERVATION FEE
  64. COURT CLERK ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON COLLECTIONS
  65. PETITIONER'S 2ND APPLICATION FOR INDIRECT CONTEMPT CITATION//FILED
  66. SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL AND ENTRY OF APPEARANCE//FILED
  67. ADJUSTING ENTRY: MONIES DUE TO AC09-CARD ALLOCATION
  68. ADJUSTING ENTRY: MONIES DUE TO THE FOLLOWING AGENCIES REDUCED BY THE FOLLOWING AMOUNTS:FD-2022-574: AC89 COURT CLERK'S RECORDS MANAGEMENT AND PRESERVATION FEE -$0.25FD-2022-574: AC79 OCIS REVOLVING FUND -$0.63FD-2022-574: AC67 DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND -$0.03FD-2022-574: AC65 STATE JUDICIAL REVOLVING FUND, INTERPRETER SVCS -$0.02FD-2022-574: AC59 COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND -$0.04FD-2022-574: AC58 OKLAHOMA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES -$0.13FD-2022-574: AC31 COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND -$0.02FD-2022-574: AC01 CLERK FEES -$0.80
  69. RECEIPT # 2023-760498 ON 12/21/2023. PAYOR: BANKS/LORENZO TOTAL AMOUNT PAID: $ 76.64. LINE ITEMS: FD-2022-574: $32.20 ON AC01 CLERK FEES. FD-2022-574: $1.92 ON AC09 CARD ALLOCATIONS. FD-2022-574: $0.64 ON AC31 COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND. FD-2022-574: $4.87 ON AC58 OKLAHOMA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES. FD-2022-574: $1.51 ON AC59 COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND. FD-2022-574: $0.43 ON AC65 STATE JUDICIAL REVOLVING FUND, INTERPRETER SVCS. FD-2022-574: $0.95 ON AC67 DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND. FD-2022-574: $24.37 ON AC79 OCIS REVOLVING FUND. FD-2022-574: $9.75 ON AC89 COURT CLERK'S RECORDS MANAGEMENT AND PRESERVATION FEE.
  70. MOTION TO ADOP THE GUARDIAN AD LITEM'S RECOMMENDATION FOR ETG TESTING/FILED
  71. RESPONSE TO PETITIONER'S MOTION TO ENFORCE VISITATION/FILED
  72. RESPONSE TO PETITIONER'S SECOND APPLICATION FOR INDIRECT CONTEMPT CITATION//FILED
  73. AMENDED MOTION TO MODIFY TEMPORARY ORDER/FILED
  74. RESPONDENT'S APPLICATION FOR EMERGENCY EX-PARTE CUSTODY ORDERS//FILED
  75. TITLE 43 O.S. 107.4 AFFIDAVIT OF LISA GEORGE//FILED
  76. AFFIDAVIT OF COUNSEL PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 13//FILED
  77. NOTICE OF HEARING//FILED
  78. CRT MIN. COMES ON FOR RESPONDENTS APPLICATION FOR INDIRECT CONTEMPT. THE COURT REVIEWS SAME AND EXECUTES THE ORDER OF CONTEMPT AND SETS THE CONTEMPT ARRAIGNMENT FOR MARCH 15, 2024 AT 9:00AM. JUDGE HALLEY
  79. RESPONDENT'S SECOND APPLICATION FOR CONTEMPT CITATION//FILED
  80. ORDER AND CONTEMPT CITATION ISSUED
  81. NOTICE OF SUBMISSION OF DISCOVERY//FILED
  82. RESPONDENT'S AMENDED SECOND APPLICATION FOR CONTEMPT CITATION//FILED
  83. HANDWRITTEN ORDER//FILED
  84. CRT MIN. BOTH PARTIES APPEAR IN PERSON ALONG WITH THEIR ATTY'S LORENZO BANKS FOR THE PETITIONER, COURTNEY SCHAMEL FOR THE RESPONDENT, HOWEVER, THE GUARDIAN AD LITEM KRISTEN BOX-LINDSEY COULD NOT BE HERE DO TO A CONFLICT. AFTER CONFERRING WITH COUNSEL, THE COURT ORDERS THAT BOTH PARTIES WILL IMMEDIATELY BEGIN THE SMART START UNTIL FURTHER ORDER OF THE COURT. THE PRIOR VISITATION ORDER REMAINS IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT. MEDIATION IS TO BE CONDUCTED. THE COURT SPECIFICALLY ORDERS THAT THE VISITATION FOR THE PLAINTIFF WILL RESUME WITH THE YOUNGEST CHILD ON 3/26/24 AND HAVE THE TUESDAY AND WEDNESDAY OVERNIGHT AND THEN HIS WEEKEND WILL BEGIN ON MARCH 29, 2024. THE MOTION TO MODIFY IS HELD IN ABEYANCE AND BOTH PARTIES ARE ARRAIGNED ON THEIR CONTEMPT, PLEAD NOT GUILTY, WAIVE A JURY TRIAL AND ARE RELEASED ON AN OR BOND. ALL AS PER ORDER EXECUTED THIS DATE. JUDGE HALLEY
  85. PETITIONER'S ENTRY OF APPEARANCE//FILED
  86. ORDER SUBSTITUTING COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER//FILED
  87. JOURNAL ENTRY FROM HEARING HELD ON MARCH 15, 2024//FILED
  88. CRT MIN.COMES ON FOR AN AGREED DECREE OF DIVORCE. THE COURT REVIEWS THE PROPOSED DECREE, THE JOINT CHILD CUSTODY PLAN, THE VISITATION SCHEDULE, AS WELL AS THE CHILD SUPPORT GUIDELINES. THE COURT RINDS THAT JURISDICTION IS PROPER, THE COURT TAKES NOTICE OF THE SIGNATURES OF BOTH PARTIES AND THEIR ATTY'S AS WELL AS THE GAL. THE COURT GRANTS THE DIVORCE THIS DATE. ORDERS THE CUSTODIAL ARRANGEMENT AS OUTLINED IN THE DECREE AS WELL AS THE DIVISION OF DEBTS AND ASSETS, THE VISITATION SCHEDULE. THE PARTIES AGREED TO WAIVE ANY CHILD SUPPORT AS OUTLINED IN THE GUIDELINES, THE COURT GRANTS THAT REQUEST AND DEVIATES FROM THE GUIDELINES ACCORDINGLY. THE COURT EXECUTES THE DECREE, JOINT CHILD CUSTODY PLAN, VISITATION SCHEDULE, AND CHILD SUPPORT GUIDELINES THIS DATE. JUDGE HALLEY
  89. AGREED DECREE OF DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE AND JOURNAL ENTRY OF JUDGMENT FILED

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more