Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2023-02-01
Type T 71 Torts Fire Damage
Docket 53 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Carole Davis|Keith Davis
Defendant United Illuminating Company|Milbank Manufacturing Co.|Aspetuck Village Condominium Association, Inc

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. ISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESS
  2. OMPLAINT
  3. PPEARANCE Appearance
  4. PPEARANCE Appearance
  5. PPEARANCE Appearance
  6. ETURN OF SERVICE
  7. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD RESULT: Granted 3/6/2023 HON DALE RADCLIFFE
  8. RDER RESULT: Granted 3/6/2023 HON DALE RADCLIFFE
  9. UPPLEMENTAL RETURN
  10. MENDED COMPLAINT Amended as a Matter of Right. Deletes prayer for punitive damages.
  11. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD UI RESULT: Granted 4/10/2023 HON DALE RADCLIFFE
  12. RDER RESULT: Granted 4/10/2023 HON DALE RADCLIFFE
  13. UMMONS AND COMPLAINT FOR APPORTIONMENT AS SERVED CGS SEC 52-102b
  14. ETURN OF SERVICE re: Apportionment Complaint
  15. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE DISCOVERY MOTION OR REQUEST PB CH13 RESULT: Granted 5/1/2023 HON DALE RADCLIFFE
  16. RDER RESULT: Granted 5/1/2023 HON DALE RADCLIFFE
  17. NSWER AND SPECIAL DEFENSE by UI
  18. OTION FOR PERMISSION TO AMEND MOTION OR PLEADING Adding Count 5 (Carole Davis v. Aspetuck) & Count 6 (Keith Davis v. Aspetuck) RESULT: Granted 5/8/2023 HON DALE RADCLIFFE
  19. RDER RESULT: Granted 5/8/2023 HON DALE RADCLIFFE
  20. NSWER AND SPECIAL DEFENSE Answer & Special Defense to Amended Complaint
  21. LAIM FOR JURY OF 6
  22. EPLY TO SPECIAL DEFENSE Milbank Manufacturing Co.
  23. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE DISCOVERY MOTION OR REQUEST PB CH13 Request for Extension to Respond to UI's IRFP's RESULT: Granted 6/6/2023 HON THOMAS SAADI
  24. RDER RESULT: Granted 6/6/2023 HON THOMAS SAADI
  25. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE DISCOVERY MOTION OR REQUEST PB CH13 MET Milbank's IRFP's RESULT: Granted 7/10/2023 HON THOMAS SAADI
  26. RDER RESULT: Granted 7/10/2023 HON THOMAS SAADI
  27. OTICE OF COMPLIANCE Notice if Compliance with UI IRFPs
  28. OMPLEX LITIGATION APPLICATION (JD-CV-39) RESULT: Order 9/19/2023 HON BARBARA BELLIS
  29. RDER RESULT: Order 9/19/2023 HON BARBARA BELLIS
  30. RANSFERRED FROM SUPERIOR COURT JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD (PRE 1/1/24)/BRIDGEPORT (POST 1/1/24)
  31. RANSFERRED TO SUPERIOR COURT JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY
  32. RDER General Case Management Order RESULT: Order 9/20/2023 HON BARBARA BELLIS
  33. NSWER Re Apportionment Complaint
  34. NSWER AND SPECIAL DEFENSE
  35. CHEDULING ORDER Counsel's proposed scheduling order RESULT: Order 10/25/2023 HON BARBARA BELLIS
  36. RDER court's approval of scheduling order RESULT: Order 10/25/2023 HON BARBARA BELLIS
  37. OTICE OF SERVICE OF REQUEST FOR ADMISSION PB 13-22 re: Plaintiff
  38. OTICE OF COMPLIANCE Plaintiff's Responses to Defendant United Illuminating Company's Requests for Admissions
  39. LECTRONIC SERVICE NOTICE JD-ES-286
  40. ASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116) re: scheduling conference
  41. EQUEST FOR ADJUDICATION COMPLEX LITIGATION (JD-CL-77)
  42. EPLY TO SPECIAL DEFENSE Davis Plaintiffs' Reply to UI's Special Defenses (#108)
  43. EPLY TO SPECIAL DEFENSE Davis Plaintiffs' Reply to Aspetuck's Special Defenses (#121)
  44. ERTIFICATE OF CLOSED PLEADINGS AND CLAIM FOR TRIAL LIST
  45. OTION TO CONSOLIDATE Joint Motion RESULT: Granted 4/15/2025 HON DANIEL KLAU
  46. RDER RESULT: Granted 4/15/2025 HON DANIEL KLAU
  47. OTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER RESULT: Granted 4/15/2025 HON DANIEL KLAU
  48. RDER RESULT: Granted 4/15/2025 HON DANIEL KLAU
  49. EQUEST FOR ADJUDICATION COMPLEX LITIGATION (JD-CL-77) re Motion to Consolidate #131
  50. EQUEST FOR ADJUDICATION COMPLEX LITIGATION (JD-CL-77) re Motion to Modify Scheduling Order #132
  51. RDER GENERAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER RESULT: Order 5/5/2025 HON DANIEL KLAU
  52. ISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESS (Plaintiffs' Disclosure of Expert Witnesses)
  53. ISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESS (Plaintiffs' Disclosure of Expert Witnesses)

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase