Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-09-12
Status INACTIVE
Type Miscellaneous Other
Docket 46 entries

Parties

Plaintiff City Of South Euclid, Ohio C/o Regional Income Tax Agency
Defendant Schneur Greenfeld|Shayna Witkes
Photo of Hon. DANIEL GAUL

Judge

Hon. DANIEL GAUL

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED: COMPLAINT
  2. ANSWER OF GARNISHEE FIFTH THIRD BANK FILED. IS THE GARNISHEE IN POSSESSION OF FUNDS: NO
  3. USPS RECEIPT NO. 57994344 DELIVERED BY USPS 09/05/2025 FIFTH THIRD BANK PROCESSED BY COC 09/10/2025.
  4. USPS RECEIPT NO. 57994310 DELIVERED BY USPS 09/05/2025 FIFTH THIRD BANK PROCESSED BY COC 09/10/2025.
  5. GARNISHMENT NOTICE(57994345) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: SCHNEUR GREENFELD 2019 LAUREL HILL DRIVE SOUTH EUCLID, OH 44121
  6. GARNISHMENT NOTICE(57994344) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: FIFTH THIRD BANK LEGAL ENTRY/SUBPOENA 1MOC2Q 5050 KINGSLEY DR CINCINNATI, OH 45263-0000
  7. GARNISHMENT NOTICE(57994311) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: SHAYNA WITKES 2019 LAUREL HILL DRIVE SOUTH EUCLID, OH 44121
  8. GARNISHMENT NOTICE(57994310) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: FIFTH THIRD BANK LEGAL ENTRY/SUBPOENA 1MOC2Q 5050 KINGSLEY DR CINCINNATI, OH 45263-0000
  9. AFFIDAVIT, ORDER AND NOTICE OF GARNISHMENT FILED. ORDER OF GARNISHMENT SENT TO GARNISHEE & NOTICE SENT TO DEBTOR. IF A HEARING IS REQUESTED, NOTICE OF HEARING DATE WILL BE SENT.
  10. AFFIDAVIT, ORDER AND NOTICE OF GARNISHMENT FILED. ORDER OF GARNISHMENT SENT TO GARNISHEE & NOTICE SENT TO DEBTOR. IF A HEARING IS REQUESTED, NOTICE OF HEARING DATE WILL BE SENT.
  11. GARNISHMENT OTHER THAN WAGE SUBMITTED $80.00
  12. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID REIMER LAW CO.
  13. GARNISHMENT OTHER THAN WAGE SUBMITTED $80.00
  14. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID REIMER LAW CO.
  15. JUDGMENT AMT: $6,221.16 RENDERED BY: CP CUYAHOGA ORIGINATING CASE NO.: CV23985270 JUDGMENT LIEN CASE#: JL25303374 CREDITOR: CITY OF SOUTH EUCLID DEBTOR: SCHNEUR GREENFIELD, ET AL., INTEREST AT: 8% INTEREST FROM DATE: 02/13/2024 COSTS: 384.27 JUDGMENT DATE: 02/13/2024 DOCKET (JOURNAL): IMAGE PAGE: IMAGE TIME FILED: 08/12/2025 13:01:52 LIEN COST: 25 PAID BY: REIMER LAW CO. SERIAL NUMBER: ACCOUNT NUMBER:
  16. NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL FILED NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL
  17. CASE REFUND TO THE REGIONAL INCOME TAX AGENCY
  18. JUDGMENT ENTRY(53047854) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: SHAYNA WITKES 2019 LAUREL HILL DRIVE SOUTH EUCLID, OH 44121
  19. JUDGMENT ENTRY(53047853) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: SCHNEUR GREENFELD 2019 LAUREL HILL DRIVE SOUTH EUCLID, OH 44121
  20. JUDGMENT ENTRY(53047852) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: BRITTANY D. CARABALLO [email protected]
  21. JUDGMENT ENTRY(53047851) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: AMBER E GREENLEAF DUBER [email protected]
  22. JUDGMENT ENTRY(53047850) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: STACIE HACKEL SNOW [email protected]
  23. JE FILED OSJ. COURT COST ASSESSED TO THE DEFENDANT(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. THIS ENTRY TAKEN BY JUDGE JANET R BURNSIDE. NOTICE ISSUED
  24. SUMS COMPLAINT(52096951) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: SHAYNA WITKES 2019 LAUREL HILL DRIVE SOUTH EUCLID, OH 44121 ANSWER DATE: 11/09/2023 ANSWER DATE: 11/09/2023 ANSWER DATE: 11/09/2023
  25. SUMS COMPLAINT(52096950) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: SCHNEUR GREENFELD 2019 LAUREL HILL DRIVE SOUTH EUCLID, OH 44121 ANSWER DATE: 11/09/2023 ANSWER DATE: 11/09/2023 ANSWER DATE: 11/09/2023
  26. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  27. WRIT FEE
  28. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  29. WRIT FEE
  30. REQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED REQUEST FOR REGULAR MAIL SERVICE FOR BOTH DEFENDANTS
  31. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 51841303 RETURNED 10/5/2023 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT WITKES/SHAYNA/ - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  32. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 51841302 RETURNED 10/5/2023 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT GREENFELD/SCHNEUR/ - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  33. SUMS COMPLAINT(51841303) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: SHAYNA WITKES 2019 LAUREL HILL DRIVE SOUTH EUCLID, OH 44121
  34. SUMS COMPLAINT(51841302) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: SCHNEUR GREENFELD 2019 LAUREL HILL DRIVE SOUTH EUCLID, OH 44121
  35. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  36. WRIT FEE
  37. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  38. WRIT FEE
  39. JUDGE DANIEL GAUL ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  40. LEGAL RESEARCH
  41. LEGAL NEWS
  42. LEGAL AID
  43. COURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  44. COMPUTER FEE
  45. CLERK'S FEE
  46. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID STACIE HACKEL SNOW

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more