Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Oklahoma unified county

Court

Oklahoma unified county

Oklahoma

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-05-22
Type Money Judgment
Docket 20 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Escalante, Peter A,
Defendant Stevens, Michael,
Photo of Hon. Reilly Maxey P

Judge

Hon. Reilly Maxey P

Okfuskee County (OK)

Oklahoma

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. NO MONIES.
  2. LAW LIBRARY ASSESSMENT
  3. DISPUTE MEDIATION ASSESSMENT
  4. SHERIFF SERVICE - CIVIL
  5. AFFIDAVIT RETURNED SERVED
  6. MINUTE ORDER-BOTH PARTIES PRESENT. BOTH PARTIES WISH TO
  7. SUBMIT EVIDENCE THAT IS STORED ON THEIR CELLULAR
  8. DEVICES WHICH IS NOT A PROPER FORMAT . BOTH PARTIES
  9. INSTRUCTED TO PRINT THE EVIDENCE AND ADMITT IT TO BE
  10. FILED. HEARING IS RE-SET FOR 06-20-23 AT 11AM PARTIES
  11. ARE RECOGNIZED BACK TO THAT DATE AND TIME.
  12. MINUTE ORDER-STEVENS HAS FILED A SEPARATE CASE AGAINST
  13. PLAINTIFF (SC-23-28) WHICH IS SET FOR HEARING ON
  14. 06-27-23 THE COURT RE-SETS THE INSANT CASE TO THE SAME
  15. DATE SO BOTH MATTERS MAY BE CONSOLIDATED FOR PUPOSES OF
  16. HEARING EACH PARTY RECOGNIZED BACK TO 06-27-23 AT
  17. 9:30AM
  18. MINUTE ORDER-PLAINTIFF AND DEF EACH APPEAR. COURT
  19. ENTERS INTO EVIDENCE PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBIT 1 .DEF CALLS
  20. NO WITNESSES. COURT DENIES PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM AND AWARDS

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more