Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-09-06
Status INACTIVE
Type Workmans Comp. Adm. Appeal
Docket 36 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Sharon Johnstone
Defendant Rwk Services, Inc. Dba, Rwk Services Metropolitan|John Logue, Administrator, Bwc
Photo of Hon. KATHLEEN ANN SUTULA

Judge

Hon. KATHLEEN ANN SUTULA

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED: COMPLAINT
  2. JUDGMENT ENTRY(55163594) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: RWK SERVICES, INC. 4700 ROCKSIDE ROAD, SUITE 330 INDEPENDENCE, OH 44131
  3. JUDGMENT ENTRY(55163593) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: CRAIG A MCCLELLAND [email protected]
  4. JUDGMENT ENTRY(55163592) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: MARGARET WHITMORE-RIBEIRO [email protected]
  5. JUDGMENT ENTRY(55163591) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: DANIEL A. KIRSCHNER [email protected]
  6. JUDGMENT ENTRY(55163590) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: DANIEL A. KIRSCHNER [email protected]
  7. CASE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. COURT COST ASSESSED TO THE PLAINTIFF(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  8. NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL FILED
  9. MEDIATION HEARING CANCELLED AS THE PLAINTIFF CANNOT BE LOCATED BY COUNSEL. CASE IS RETURNED TO THE JUDGE'S DOCKET FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS. NOTICE ISSUED
  10. MEDIATION SCHEDULED FOR 06/04/2024 AT 10:00 AM IS CANCELLED.
  11. MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL 11/06/2024 - UNKNOWN
  12. STIPULATION FILED BY P1 SHARON JOHNSTONE ATTORNEY MARGARET WHITMORE-RIBEIRO 0096431 JOINT STIPULATIONS
  13. STIPULATION FILED BY P1 SHARON JOHNSTONE ATTORNEY MARGARET WHITMORE-RIBEIRO 0096431 PLAINTIFF'S PROPOSED STIPULATIONS
  14. MEDIATION SCHEDULED FOR 03/14/2024 AT 10:00 AM IS CANCELLED.
  15. MEDIATION SET FOR 06/04/2024 AT 10:00 AM. (Notice Sent).
  16. MEDIATION SET FOR 03/14/2024 AT 10:00 AM. (Notice Sent).
  17. CAPTIONED CASE IS HEREBY REFERRED TO MEDIATION WITH THE COURT MEDIATOR. MEDIATION TO CONCLUDE WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THIS ENTRY. NOTICE ISSUED
  18. CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE CONDUCTED 1/16/2024. THE FOLLOWING DATES, IN ADDITION TO THE DATES SET FORTH IN THE TRIAL ORDER, APPLY: 1. TRIAL SCHEDULED FOR 8/5/2024 AT 8:00 A.M. 2. TRIAL ORDER ENTERED. O.S.J. NOTICE ISSUED
  19. TRIAL SET FOR 08/05/2024 AT 08:00 AM.
  20. CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE SET FOR 1/16/2024 AT 11:00 A.M. COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S) SHALL INFORM ALL OPPOSING COUNSEL AND/OR PRO SE PARTIES, IN WRITING, OF THIS DATE AND TIME. COUNSEL FOR ALL PARTIES ARE REQUIRED TO BE PRESENT IN PERSON AND TO BE FAMILIAR WITH THE UNDERLYING FACTS OF THE CASE. PARTIES NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL SHALL LIKEWISE BE PRESENT IN PERSON. FAILURE OF ANY KIND OF THE AFOREMENTIONED PERSONS TO APPEAR AT THIS PROPERLY SCHEDULED CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE MAY RESULT IN SANCTIONS INCLUDING DISMISSAL OF THE CASE AND/OR JUDGMENT BEING RENDERED. IF A CONTINUANCE IS SOUGHT FOR ANY REASON, PLEASE FILE THE APPROPRIATE MOTION AT LEAST SEVEN DAYS BEFORE THE SCHEDULED EVENT. DO NOT CALL THE COURT. DATES CANNOT BE CONSIDERED FOR CONTINUANCE UNLESS A MOTION HAS BEEN DOCKETED AND HAND-DELIVERED TO THE COURT. NOTICE ISSUED
  21. ANSWER FILED BY D2 JOHN LOGUE, ADMINISTRATOR, BWC ATTORNEY CRAIG A MCCLELLAND 0097332 BUREAU OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION ANSWER WITH JURY DEMAND
  22. USPS RECEIPT NO. 51793930 DELIVERED BY USPS 09/12/2023 JOHN LOGUE, ADMINISTRATOR, BWC PROCESSED BY COC 09/20/2023.
  23. USPS RECEIPT NO. 51793929 DELIVERED BY USPS 09/11/2023 RWK SERVICES, INC. PROCESSED BY COC 09/20/2023.
  24. COMPLAINT W/ NO SUMS(51793930) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: JOHN LOGUE, ADMINISTRATOR, BWC WILLIAM GREEN BUILDING 30 WEST SPRING STREET COLUMBUS, OH 43215
  25. COMPLAINT W/ NO SUMS(51793929) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: RWK SERVICES, INC. 4700 ROCKSIDE ROAD, SUITE 330 INDEPENDENCE, OH 44131
  26. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  27. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  28. JUDGE JENNIFER O'DONNELL ASSIGNED (RANDOM); RE-FILED CASE, REASSIGNED TO ORIGINAL JUDGE, JUDGE KATHLEEN ANN SUTULA
  29. JUDGE JENNIFER O'DONNELL ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  30. LEGAL RESEARCH
  31. LEGAL NEWS
  32. LEGAL AID
  33. COURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  34. COMPUTER FEE
  35. CLERK'S FEE
  36. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID MARGARET WHITMORE-RIBEIRO

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more