Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Kern Co Non Criminal Court

Court

Kern Co Non Criminal Court

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-08-21
Status Judgment
Type 26 Cv Other Real Property Civil Unlimited
Docket 77 entries
Disposition court trial

Parties

Plaintiff Steve Milicic, Trustee Of The Steve Milicic Trust U/d/t Dated November 19, 1999 And Restated November 16, 2016|Natalie Vaught, Trustee Of The Natalie Vaught Milicic Trust U/d/t Dated November 18, 1999
Defendant Malaney, Rena|Tudor, Daniel|Tudor, John|Tudor, Lisa|Tudor, Justine|All Persons Unknown Claiming Any Legal Or Equitable Right, Title, Estate, Lien, Or Interest In The Property Described In The Complaint Adverse To Plaintiffs Title, Or Creates Any Cloud Upon Plaintiffs Title Thereto
Photo of Hon. Non, Fast Track

Judge

Hon. Non, Fast Track

Kern County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark
  2. Hearing Time 8:30 AM
  3. Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark
  4. Hearing Time 8:30 AM
  5. Comment as to Rena Malaney via mail service
  6. Judicial Officer Cervantes, Gina M. Comment in The Daily Report
  7. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment re; Proof of Service x 2
  8. Comment Daniel Tudor; Sub Service
  9. Comment Justine Tudor; Personal Service
  10. Comment Notice of Non-Stipulation to Court Commissioner and Judge Pro Tem
  11. View Document Ruling 10/23/2023 Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Ruling
  12. Comment as to John Tudor via personal service
  13. Comment 1b does not conform to Complaint. Signatures are missing throughout the document.
  14. Comment 1b does not conform to Complaint. Signatures missing throughout document.
  15. Comment 1b does not conform to Complaint. Signatures missing throughout the document.
  16. Comment 1b does not conform to Complaint. Signatures missing throughout the document.
  17. Comment as to John Tudor on Complaint filed 08/21/2023
  18. Comment as to Rena Malaney on Complaint filed 08/21/2023
  19. Comment as to Justine Tudor on Complaint filed 08/21/2023
  20. Comment as to Daniel Tudor on Complaint filed 08/21/2023
  21. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Proof of Service
  22. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment re; Proof of Service
  23. Comment Demurrer to Complaint filed Lisa Tudor
  24. Comment as to Lisa Tudor via certified mail
  25. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC-NFT (N18C) View Document Order to Show Cause - CRC 3.110 12/21/2023 Judicial Officer Cervantes, Gina M. Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held
  26. Comment as to All Persons unknown claiming any legal or equitable right, title, estate, lien or interest in the property described in the Complaint adverse to Plaintiff's title, or creates any cloud upon Plaintiff's title thereto via publication
  27. Comment Plaintiffs' opposition to demurrers of defendants, Lisa Tudor and Daniel Tudor, to the complaint
  28. Comment Declaration of Elizabeth Estrada in support of plaintiffs opposition to demurrers of defendants, Lisa Tudor and Daniel Tudor, to the complaint
  29. Comment Plaintiffs evidentiary objections in opposition to demurrers of defendants, Lisa Tudor and Daniel Tudor, to the complaint
  30. Comment Plaintiffs' Ex Parte Application to Advance Hearing on Defendants' Demurrer to Complaint
  31. Comment Memorandum in Support of Plaintiffs' Ex Parte Application
  32. Comment Declaration of Elizabeth Estrada in Support of Plaintiffs' Ex Parte Application
  33. View Document Ex Parte Hearing - Pre-Disposition 01/02/2024 Judicial Officer Cervantes, Gina M. Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment Filed 12/13/23. Defendant, Lisa Tudor'S Demurrer to Complaint **Matter advanced from 2/15/2024 by the Court and heard on 1/02/2024**
  34. View Document Ex Parte Hearing - Pre-Disposition 01/02/2024 Judicial Officer Cervantes, Gina M. Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment Plaintiff, Ex Parte Application to Advance Hearing on Defendants' Demurrer to Complaint
  35. Judicial Officer Cervantes, Gina M. Comment IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. Plaintiffs' ex parte application is granted. 2. The hearing on the demurrers of defendants, Daniel Tudor and Lisa Tudor, to the complaint is advanced from February 15, 2024 to January 2, 2024 at 8:30 a.m. in Division L of the Kern County Superior Court; and Demurrer is overruled, Defendant has 30 court days to file an answer
  36. Comment of Order
  37. Judicial Officer Cervantes, Gina M. Hearing Time 8:30 AM Cancel Reason Proof Of Service Filed Comment Continued from 12/21/2023
  38. Comment Plaintiffs' Case Management Statement, 3/04/24, 8:30 a.m., Div. L
  39. Comment Defendant Lisa Tudor's Case Management Statement, 3/04/24, 8:30 a.m., Div. L
  40. Comment Re. Lisa Tudor's Case Management Statement
  41. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC-NFT (N18C) View Document Case Management Conference 03/04/2024 Judicial Officer Cervantes, Gina M. Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held
  42. Comment and Final Case Management Conference, 11/13/24, 9:30 a.m., Div. L
  43. Comment Notice of motion and motion of plaintiffs for motion for judgment on the pleadings
  44. Comment Plaintiffs memorandum in support of motion for judgment on the pleadings
  45. Comment Declaration of Elizabeth Estrada in support of plaintiffs motion for judgment on the pleadings
  46. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment RE: Motion to be relieved as counsel for Daniel Tudor. Daniel Tudor is not represented by Royal Bond or any other attorney. Daniel Tudor was defaulted on 11/28/23. The Demurrer filed 12/13/23 was accepted on behalf of Lisa Tudor only.
  47. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment RE: Motion to be relieved as counsel for Lisa Tudor. There is a red box in the file stamp box on each document. Please remove the red box and resubmit.
  48. Comment Defendant Lisa Tudor s opposition to Plaintiffs motion for judgment on The pleadings; memorandum of Points and authorities; declaration Of Lisa Tudor; and exhibits attached
  49. Comment Defendant Lisa Tudor s request for Judicial notice in support of Defendant's opposition to plaintiffs' Motion for judgment on the Pleadings
  50. Comment Defendant Lisa Tudor's amended request for judicial notice in support of Defendant's opposition to Plaintiffs' motion for judgment on the pleadings
  51. Comment Plaintiffs' Reply in support of Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings
  52. View Document Motion for Judgment on Pleadings 05/30/2024 Judicial Officer Cervantes, Gina M. Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment 4/30/2024 Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings
  53. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Motion to be relieved: the red box cannot appear on the designated file stamp area
  54. Comment Motion to be relieved as counsel
  55. Comment Declaration
  56. Comment Without prejudice as to Does 1-25
  57. Comment of Compliance CRC 3.1312
  58. Comment of the Case in support of Default Judgment
  59. Comment Declaration of Steve Milicic in Support of Default Judgment
  60. View Document Motion to be Relieved / Withdraw (Pre-Disposition) 06/24/2024 Judicial Officer Cervantes, Gina M. Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment 6/5/2024 Defendants motion to be relieved as counsel
  61. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Request for Court Judgment - #6a missing attachment 6d not attached to CIV-100 as stated.
  62. Judicial Officer Cervantes, Gina M. Comment IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The motion of plaintiffs for judgment on the pleadings is granted without leave to amend.
  63. Judicial Officer Cervantes, Gina M. Comment on the Pleadings
  64. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Request for court Judgment- 1b party does not fully conform to Complaint not all parties have been Defaulted to request Judgment / and #6 incomplete as to Service for all Defendants./ Default Setting for Prove up not set not all parties have been Defaulted.in order to schedule a Prove-up hearing.
  65. Comment As to All persons unknown claiming any legal or equitable right, title, estate, lien or interest in the property described in the Complaint adverse to Plaintff's Title, or creates any cloud upon Plaintiffs titel thereto on complaint filed 8/21/23
  66. Comment As to Rena Malaney, Daniel Tudor, John Tudor, Justine Tudor ; All persons unknown claiming any legal or equitable right, title, estate, lien or interest in the property described in the Complaint adverse to Plaintiff's Title, or creates any cloud upon Plaintiffs title thereto on complaint filed 8/21/23
  67. Comment Prove-up hearing 8/14/2023 @ 8L30am D-L
  68. View Document Default 08/14/2024 Judicial Officer Cervantes, Gina M. Hearing Time 08:30 AM Result Held Comment Prove-up
  69. Judicial Officer Cervantes, Gina M. Comment on the Pleadings
  70. Judicial Officer Cervantes, Gina M. Hearing Time 9:00 AM Cancel Reason Court's Own Motion Comment T/E: 2 Days
  71. Judicial Officer Cervantes, Gina M. Hearing Time 9:00 AM Cancel Reason Court's Own Motion

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more