Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Arkansas Unified County

Court

Arkansas Unified County

Arkansas

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-07-07
Status FINAL - FINAL
Type Dw Dept Workforce Service
Docket 85 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Storm, Cecily Alison|James, Paul Joseph|Riordan, Deborah K
Defendant Uhrynowycz, Cynthia Lea
Photo of Hon. Larry D Vaught

Judge

Hon. Larry D Vaught

Arkansas County (AR)

Arkansas

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. DWS PET FOR REVW/BRD OF REVW
  2. none.
  3. No Images
  4. LETTER
  5. none.
  6. Letter
  7. CLERK NOTE
  8. The attorney would like a briefing schedule once the record is filed.
  9. No Images
  10. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE
  11. Entry of appearance by Deborah Truby Riordan and request for briefing schedule
  12. No Images
  13. ANSWER AND RECORD FILED
  14. 1-18-23 Supplemental record: 1 volume; 88 pages.
  15. No Images
  16. BRIEFING COMMENCED
  17. Appellant's Brief is due November 7, 2022.
  18. Breifing Schedule
  19. MOT TO SUPP THE RECORD
  20. Appellant's motion to correct the record and to stay briefing schedule.
  21. No Images
  22. 7 DAY BRIEF EXTENSION
  23. The appellant's brief is now due November 14, 2022, after a 7-day brief extension.
  24. MOTION
  25. RESPONSE TO MOTION
  26. Objection to motion to correct the record and to stay briefing schedule.
  27. No Images
  28. RESPONSE/REPLY
  29. Appellant's reply in support of motion to correct record and to stay briefing schedule. Tendered.
  30. Response tendered
  31. MOTION SUBMITTED
  32. Appellant's motion to correct the record and to stay briefing schedule.
  33. No Images
  34. RECUSAL
  35. none.
  36. No Images
  37. RECUSAL
  38. none.
  39. No Images
  40. FORMAL ORDERS - COA
  41. Appellant's motion to correct the record and to stay briefing schedule is granted. Harrison, C.J., and Virden, J., would deny. Gladwin and Vaught, JJ., not participating. Corrected electronic record due in thirty days (December 30, 2022). Appellant's brief is due thirty days after the filing of the corrected record.
  42. ORDER
  43. SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD TENDERED
  44. Supplemental record tendered pending motion.
  45. No Images
  46. MOT TO SUPP THE RECORD
  47. Appellees' motion to accept supplemental record.
  48. MOTION
  49. MOTION SUBMITTED
  50. Appellees' motion to accept supplemental record.
  51. No Images
  52. FORMAL ORDERS - COA
  53. Appellees' motion to accept supplemental record is granted. Gladwin, J., not participating. Tendered supplemental record filed this date.
  54. Order
  55. SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD LODGED
  56. Supplemental record: 1 volume; 88 pages.
  57. No Images
  58. MOTION DISMISS
  59. Appellant's motion to dismiss appeal.
  60. MOTION
  61. FORMAL ORDERS - COA
  62. Appellant's motion to dismiss appeal is granted. Gladwin, J., not participating.
  63. ORDER
  64. ORDER APPEAL DISMISSED
  65. none.
  66. No Images

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more