Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Knox Co

Court

Knox Co

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-11-21
Status CASE CLOSED
Type Tampering With Evidence
Docket 71 entries
Disposition default

Parties

Defendant Langston, Uriah
Photo of Hon. Wetzel Richard D

Judge

Hon. Wetzel Richard D

Knox County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. OTION FINISHED CASE FILED AWAY
  2. NDICTMENT & REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF WARRANT
  3. ARRANT ISSUED TO SHERIFF OF KNOX COUNTY
  4. OTICE OF CONFLICT W/CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 11/22/2022 03:51 PM Attorney: PYLE, JOHN S
  5. EFENDANT ARRESTED ON NOVEMBER 21, 2022
  6. OLLOWING WAS SCHEDULED: Judge: WETZEL, RICHARD D Event: CRIMINAL ARRAIGNMENT Date: 12/01/2022 Time: 09:00 AM
  7. T IS ORDERED THAT ATTORNEY HITCHMAN IS APPOINTED COUNSEL FOR THE DEFENDANT IN THIS MATTER. COPIES SENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL 5(B).
  8. EMAND FOR DISCOVERY, BILL OF PARTICULARS, REQUEST FOR NOTICE OF PROSECUTOR'S INTENTION TO USE EVIDENCE, RECIPROCAL DISCOVERY F/BY ATTY HITCHMAN
  9. ETTING OF DEFENDANTS BOND $25,000.00 CASH - NO 10% PROVISION (SURETY BOND ACCEPTABLE) WITH CONDITIONS
  10. ERTIFICATE FOR COURT STENOGRAPHER'S FEES
  11. AUSE HEARD ON NOVEMBER 30, 2022, FOR PURPOSES OF ARRAIGNMENT. COPIES SENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL RULE 5(B).
  12. OLLOWING WAS SCHEDULED: Judge: WETZEL, RICHARD D Event: CRIMINAL JURY TRIAL Date: 01/31/2023 Time: 09:00 AM Result: HEARING CONTINUED
  13. EARING ASSIGNMENT / CASE SCHEDULE
  14. RE-TRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER. COPIES SENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL RULE 5(B)
  15. RETRIAL RELEASE PROGRAM ORDER OF BOND CONDITIONS. COPIES SENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL RULE 5(B)
  16. ASH & RECOGNIZANCE BOND POSTED BY BONDING COMPANY
  17. EMAND FOR DISCOVERY 12/12/2022 10:17 AM Attorney: WILLIAMS, CHRISTINE C
  18. ESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR DISCOVERY W/CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 12/12/2022 10:17 AM Attorney: WILLIAMS, CHRISTINE C
  19. ITNESS LIST W/CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 12/12/2022 10:17 AM Attorney: WILLIAMS, CHRISTINE C
  20. OTICE OF INTENTION TO USE EVIDENCE W/CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 12/12/2022 10:17 AM Attorney: WILLIAMS, CHRISTINE C
  21. IST OF EXHIBITS NOT ABLE TO BE PHOTOCOPIED W/CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 12/12/2022 10:17 AM Attorney: WILLIAMS, CHRISTINE C
  22. ILL OF PARTICULARS 12/12/2022 10:17 AM Attorney: WILLIAMS, CHRISTINE C
  23. OTION FOR CONTINUANCE WITH PROOF OF SERVICE (COPY COURT WITH ENTRY) Attorney: HITCHMAN, TERRY D
  24. OLLOWING WAS SCHEDULED: Judge: WETZEL, RICHARD D Event: CRIMINAL JURY TRIAL Date: 03/21/2023 Time: 09:00 AM Result: HEARING CONTINUED
  25. RDER GRANTING MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL DATE. COPIES SENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL RULE 5(B).
  26. RE-TRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER. COPIES SENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL RULE 5(B)
  27. OND VIOLATION ORDER TO HOLD AND SET HEARING. COPIES SENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIV R 5(B)
  28. RDER FOR STATEWIDE WARRANT. COPIES SENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIV R 5(B)
  29. ARRANT ISSUED TO SHERIFF OF KNOX COUNTY
  30. EFENDANT URIAH LANGSTON ARRESTED ON 01/27/2023.
  31. OLLOWING WAS SCHEDULED: Judge: WETZEL, RICHARD D Event: CRIMINAL BOND HEARING Date: 02/02/2023 Time: 09:00 AM
  32. ETTING OF DEFENDANTS BOND $35,000.00 CASH - NO 10% PROVISION (SURETY BOND ACCEPTABLE) WITH CONDITIONS
  33. ERTIFICATE FOR COURT STENOGRAPHER'S FEES
  34. ASH & RECOGNIZANCE BOND POSTED BY BONDING COMPANY
  35. OTION FOR CONTINUANCE WITH PROOF OF SERVICE (COPY COURT WITH ENTRY) Attorney: HITCHMAN, TERRY D
  36. OLLOWING WAS SCHEDULED: Judge: WETZEL, RICHARD D Event: CRIMINAL JURY TRIAL Date: 05/23/2023 Time: 09:00 AM Result: PLEA OF GUILTY
  37. NTRY GRANTING MOTION TO CONTINUE. COPIES SENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL RULE 5(B).
  38. RE-TRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER. COPIES SENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL RULE 5(B)
  39. OND VIOLATION ORDER TO HOLD AND SET HEARING W/BONF VIOLATION REPORT. COPIES SENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIV R 5(B)
  40. RDER FOR STATEWIDE WARRANT. COPIES SENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIV R 5(B)
  41. TATEWIDE WARRANT ISSUED TO SHERIFF OF KNOX COUNTY
  42. EFENDANT ARRESTED ON 4/20/2023
  43. OLLOWING WAS SCHEDULED: Judge: WETZEL, RICHARD D Event: CRIMINAL BOND HEARING Date: 05/04/2023 Time: 09:00 AM
  44. ERTIFICATE FOR COURT STENOGRAPHER'S FEES
  45. AUSE HEARD ON MAY 4, 2023, FOR PURPOSES OF RE-ESTABLISHING BOND. DEFENDANT TO BE HELD WITHOUT BOND. COPIES SENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL RULE 5(B).
  46. OLLOWING WAS SCHEDULED: Judge: WETZEL, RICHARD D Event: PLEA OF GUILTY HEARING Date: 05/23/2023 Time: 01:30 PM
  47. EARING ASSIGNMENT / CASE SCHEDULE
  48. LEA OF GUILTY SECTION 2921.12(A)(1) THIRD DEGREE FELONY DEFENDANT'S PLEA OF GUILTY IS ACCEPTED AND ORDERED FILED ON 5/24/2023
  49. AUSE HEARD ON MAY 23, 2023, FOR PURPOSES OF DEFENDANT TO ENTER A PLEA OF GUILTY. DEFENDANT TO BE HELD WITH OUT BOND. COPIES SENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL RULE 5(B).
  50. OLLOWING WAS SCHEDULED: Judge: WETZEL, RICHARD D Event: IMPOSITION OF SENTENCE Date: 06/29/2023 Time: 09:00 AM
  51. EARING ASSIGNMENT / CASE SCHEDULE
  52. ERTIFICATE FOR COURT STENOGRAPHER'S FEES
  53. ENTENCING AGREEMENT DISCLOSURE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT
  54. AUSE HEARD ON JUNE 29, 2023, FOR PURPOSES OF IMPOSITION OF SENTENCE. DEFENDANT TO SERVE A DEFINITE TERM OF IMPRISONMENT OF 30 MONTHS TO BE SERVED CONSECUTIVELY TO THE SENTENCE IMPOSED IN KNOX COUNTY COMMON PLEAS COURT, STATE OF OHIO VS. URIAH LANGSTON, CASE NO 22CR08-0179. THE DEFENDANT IS GIVEN 125 DAYS JAIL TIME CREDIT ALONG WITH FUTURE DAYS WHILE AWAITING TRANSPORTATION TO THE APPROPRIATE INSTITUTION. THE COURT IS ASSESSING A FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $5,000.00, WHICH SHALL BE VACATED DUE TO INDIGENCE. BOND IS CANCELED. DEFENDANT TO PAY COSTS.
  55. OTICE OF JOURNAL ENTRY FILING TO ATTYS. IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL RULE 58(B), IT IS VERIFIED THAT COPIES HAVE BEEN SENT TO THE PARTIES AND/OR THEIR ATTORNEY OF RECORD IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIVIL RULE 5(B) ON THIS DAY.
  56. ARRANT TO CONVEY ISSUED TO KNOX COUNTY SHERIFF
  57. ENTENCING ENTRY MAILED TO B.S.C. BY CERTIFIED MAIL
  58. INAL RECORD PAGES FEE
  59. ASE FINISHED CASE FILED AWAY
  60. EFENDANT CONVEYED TO ODRC ON 7/7/2023
  61. TEMIZED BILL SENT TO: LANGSTON, URIAH was sent bill for $691.00 printed on 07/11/2023
  62. ETURN RECEIPT FILED WITH DATE SIGNED BUREAU OF SENTENCE COMPUTATION (NO DLV DATE)
  63. ERTIFIED COST BILL SENT TO INSTITUTION: CORRECTIONAL RECEPTION CENTER
  64. PDATED CERTIFIED COST BILL SENT TO INSTITUTION - PICKAWAY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
  65. TEMIZED BILL SENT TO: LANGSTON, URIAH was sent bill for $691.00 printed on 11/04/2024
  66. PDATED CERTIFIED COST BILL SENT TO INSTITUTION
  67. OTION FOR JUDICIAL RELEASE (C/CT) F/BY URIAH LANGSTON, PRO SE
  68. T IS ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR JUDICIAL RELEASE IS DENIED. COPIES SENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL RULE 5 (B).
  69. OTION FINISHED CASE FILED AWAY
  70. OTION FOR JUDICIAL RELEASE (C/CT) F/BY URIAH LANGSTON, PRO SE
  71. T IS ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR JUDICIAL RELEASE IS DENIED. COPIES SENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL RULE 5 (B).

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more