Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Alaska Unified

Court

Alaska Unified

Alaska

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-08-09
Status Closed
Type Civil Superior Ct (4 Fa)|Automobile Tort (but Not Wrongful Death)
Docket 39 entries
Disposition dismiss

Parties

Plaintiff Moore, Steven
Defendant Lenz, Josef|Quality Controls Inc|Liberty Mutual Insurance
Photo of Hon. Haines Patricia L

Judge

Hon. Haines Patricia L

Denali Borough (AK)

Alaska

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. ismissed by Stipulation or Unopposed Motion
  2. omplaint for Personal Injury and/or Property Damages- Automobile Related Receipt: 2114071 Date: 08/09/2023
  3. ummons and Notice to Both Parties of Judicial Assignment Josef Lenz (Defendant);
  4. ummons and Notice to Both Parties of Judicial Assignment Quality Controls Inc (Defendant);
  5. ummons and Notice to Both Parties of Judicial Assignment Liberty Mutual Insurance (Defendant);
  6. otion to Dismiss Attorney: Self-Represented (0100001) Filing Party: Moore, Steven Case Motion #1
  7. otice to the Court Steven Moore (Plaintiff);
  8. rder Granting Motion Case Motion #1 Motion to Dismiss Liberty Mutual Ins
  9. ttorney Information Attorney Walker, Stacy L representing Defendant Quality Controls Inc as of 08/30/2023
  10. ttorney Information Attorney Walker, Stacy L representing Defendant Lenz, Josef as of 08/30/2023
  11. nswer Stacy L Walker (Attorney) on behalf of Josef Lenz (Defendant)
  12. emand for Jury Trial Stacy L Walker (Attorney) on behalf of Josef Lenz (Defendant)
  13. otion For Reasonable Consideration (disabled) Attorney: Self-Represented (0100001) Filing Party: Moore, Steven Case Motion #2
  14. eply to Response Plaintiffs Complaint Steven Moore (Plaintiff);
  15. efendants' Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Reasonable Consideration (Disabled) Attorney: Walker, Stacy L (0005014) Case Motion #2: Motion For Reasonable Consideration (disabled)
  16. eply to Response to Motion for Reasonable Consideration (Disabled) Attorney: Self-Represented (0100001) Case Motion #2: Motion For Reasonable Consideration (disabled)
  17. rder Denying Without Prejudice Motion For Reasonable Consideration (disabled)
  18. retrial Order
  19. otion for Partial Summary Judgment Attorney: Walker, Stacy L (0005014) Filing Party: Lenz, Josef; Quality Controls Inc Case Motion #3
  20. esponse to Motion for Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Attorney: Self-Represented (0100001) Case Motion #3: Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
  21. eply in Support of Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Attorney: Walker, Stacy L (0005014) Case Motion #3: Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
  22. otice of Intent to Grant Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Case Motion #3: Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
  23. otion for Judgement as a Matter of Law Attorney: Self-Represented (0100001) Steven Moore (Plaintiff); Filing Party: Moore, Steven Case Motion #4
  24. otion for HIPPA Release Providers Only Attorney: Self-Represented (0100001) Filing Party: Moore, Steven Case Motion #5
  25. efendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law Attorney: Walker, Stacy L (0005014) Case Motion #4: Motion for Judgement as a Matter of Law
  26. otion: Short Term Adjournment of Court Filings Attorney: Self-Represented (0100001) Filing Party: Moore, Steven Case Motion #6
  27. otion for Extension of Time Attorney: Self-Represented (0100001) Filing Party: Moore, Steven Case Motion #7
  28. efendants' Partial Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for HIPPA Release Providers Only Attorney: Walker, Stacy L (0005014) Case Motion #5: Motion for HIPPA Release Providers Only
  29. efendants' Partial Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion: Short Term Adjournment of Court Filings Attorney: Walker, Stacy L (0005014) Case Motion #6: Motion: Short Term Adjournment of Court Filings
  30. efendants' Non-Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time Attorney: Walker, Stacy L (0005014) Case Motion #7: Motion for Extension of Time
  31. rder Granting Motion Case Motion #7 Motion for Extension of Time
  32. rder Denying Motion Case Motion #4 Motion for Judgement as a Matter of Law
  33. rder Denying Motion in Part Case Motion #6 Motion: Short Term Adjournment of Court Filings
  34. rder Denying Motion in Part Case Motion #5 Motion for HIPPA Release Providers Only
  35. esponse to Judges Intent to Rule on Respondents Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Attorney: Self-Represented (0100001) Case Motion #3: Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
  36. efendant's Preliminary Witness List Stacy L Walker (Attorney) on behalf of Josef Lenz (Defendant)
  37. rder Granting Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
  38. tipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice Attorney: Walker, Stacy L (0005014) Filing Party: Moore, Steven; Lenz, Josef; Quality Controls Inc Case Motion #8
  39. rder Granting Motion Case Motion #8 Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more