Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2021-10-18
Status CASE CLOSED
Type Burglary
Docket 41 entries
Disposition default

Parties

Defendant Sisson, John R
Photo of Hon. Wetzel Richard D

Judge

Hon. Wetzel Richard D

Knox County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. TEMIZED BILL SENT TO: SISSON, JOHN R was sent bill for $332.00 printed on 03/01/2023
  2. NDICTMENT & REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF WARRANT
  3. ARRANT ISSUED TO SHERIFF OF KNOX COUNTY
  4. EQUEST FOR DISPOSITION OF INDICTMENTS, INFORMATION OR COMPLAINTS (C/CT)
  5. EMAND FOR DISCOVERY 04/26/2022 11:10 AM Attorney: WILLIAMS, CHRISTINE C
  6. ESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR DISCOVERY W/CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 04/26/2022 11:10 AM Attorney: WILLIAMS, CHRISTINE C
  7. ITNESS LIST W/CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 04/26/2022 11:10 AM Attorney: WILLIAMS, CHRISTINE C
  8. OTICE OF INTENTION TO USE EVIDENCE W/CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 04/26/2022 11:10 AM Attorney: WILLIAMS, CHRISTINE C
  9. IST OF EXHIBITS NOT ABLE TO BE PHOTOCOPIED W/CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 04/26/2022 11:10 AM Attorney: WILLIAMS, CHRISTINE C
  10. OLLOWING WAS SCHEDULED: Judge: WETZEL, RICHARD D Event: CRIMINAL ARRAIGNMENT Date: 05/25/2022 Time: 01:00 PM
  11. HIS CAUSE CAME BEFORE THE COURT ON DEFENDANT'S NOTICE OF PLACEMENT OF IMPRISONMENT AND REQUEST FOR DISPOSITION OF INDICTMENTS, INFORMATION OR COMPLAINTS. THE COURT APPOINTS THE KNOX COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER'S OFFICE TO REPRESENT THE DEFENDANT IN THIS CASE. COPIES SENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL RULE 5(B).
  12. EARING ASSIGNMENT FEE
  13. EMAND FOR DISCOVERY 04/28/2022 10:35 AM Attorney: DANKOVICH, JOHN A
  14. EFENDANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR FILING PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS W/CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE (C/COURT W/ORDER) 04/28/2022 10:35 AM Attorney: DANKOVICH, JOHN A
  15. EFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR DISCOVERY 04/28/2022 10:35 AM Attorney: DANKOVICH, JOHN A
  16. RDER GRANTING MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS. COPIES SENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL 5(B).
  17. ETTING OF DEFENDANTS BOND PERSONAL RECOGNIZANCE BOND
  18. ERTIFICATE FOR COURT STENOGRAPHER'S FEES
  19. AUSE HEARD ON MAY 25, 2022 FOR PURPOSES OF ARRAIGNMENT. COPIES SENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL RULE 5(B).
  20. OLLOWING WAS SCHEDULED: Judge: WETZEL, RICHARD D Event: CRIMINAL JURY TRIAL Date: 07/19/2022 Time: 09:00 AM Result: PLEA OF GUILTY
  21. OLLOWING WAS SCHEDULED: Judge: WETZEL, RICHARD D Event: PLEA OF GUILTY HEARING / WAIVE PSI / SENTENCE Date: 07/06/2022 Time: 01:00 PM
  22. EARING ASSIGNMENT FEE
  23. RE-TRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER. COPIES SENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL RULE 5(B)
  24. LEA AGREEMENT DISCLOSURE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT
  25. LEA OF GUILTY SECTION 291.12(A)(1) SECOND DEGREE FELONY SECTION 2913.02(A)(1) FIRST DEGREE MISDEMEANOR DEFENDANT'S PLEA OF GUILTY IS ACCEPTED AND FILED ON 7/8/2022
  26. AUSE HEARD ON JULY 6, 2022 FOR PURPOSES OF DEFENDANT TO ENTER A PLEA OF GUILTY. COPIES SENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL RULE 5(B).
  27. ENTENCING AGREEMENT DISCLOSURE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT
  28. AUSE HEARD ON JULY 6, 2022 FOR PURPOSES OF IMPOSITION OF SENTENCE. DEFENDANT TO SERVE AN INDEFINITE TERM OF IMPRISONMENT OF A MINIMUM TERM OF 5 YEARS AND A MAXIMUM TERM OF 7.5 YEARS ON COUNT ONE AND 90 DAYS ON COUNT TWO, TO BE SERVED CONCURRENTLY AND CONCURRENTLY WITH THE SENTENCE IMPOSED IN THE RICHLAND COUNTY COMMON PLEAS COURT, STATE OF OHIO VS. JOHN W SISSON, CASE NO 2021CR0513 AND DELAWARE COUNTY CASE NO 21CR1080443. THE DEFENDANT IS GIVEN CREDIT FOR 0 DAYS SERVED. BOND IS CANCELED. DEFENDANT TO PAY COSTS.
  29. OTICE OF JOURNAL ENTRY FILING TO ATTYS. IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL RULE 58(B), IT IS VERIFIED THAT COPIES HAVE BEEN SENT TO THE PARTIES AND/OR THEIR ATTORNEY OF RECORD IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIVIL RULE 5(B) ON THIS DAY.
  30. ENTENCING ENTRY MAILED TO B.S.C. BY CERTIFIED MAIL
  31. INAL RECORD PAGES FEE
  32. ASE FINISHED CASE FILED AWAY
  33. TEMIZED BILL SENT TO: SISSON, JOHN R was sent bill for $318.00 printed on 07/08/2022
  34. ETURN RECEIPT FILED WITH DATE SIGNED BUREAU OF SENTENCE COMPUTATION
  35. ERTIFIED COST BILL SENT TO INSTITUTION
  36. OTION TO WAIVE, SUSPEND OR MODIFY THE COLLECTION OF COURT COSTS AND FINES (CCT) F/BY JOHN SISSON, PRO SE
  37. OURNAL ENTRY - DEFENDANTS MOTION TO WAIVE, SUSPEND, OR MODIFY THE COLLECTION OF COURT COSTS AND FINES IS DENIED. COPIES SENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL RULE 5(B).
  38. INAL RECORD PAGES FEE
  39. OTION FINISHED CASE FILED AWAY
  40. HE WARRANT ISSED ON OCTOBER 18, 2021 IS VACATED. COPIES SENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL RULE 5(B).
  41. ETURN OF UNEXECUTED WARRANT

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.