Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Arkansas Unified County

Court

Arkansas Unified County

Arkansas

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-11-09
Status CLOSED - CASE CLOSED
Type Dw Dept Workforce Service
Docket 53 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Hampton, Herman|Simes, Alvin Leonard
Defendant Uhrynowycz, Cynthia Lea|Kelliher, Dawn R
Photo of Hon. Barton F Virden

Judge

Hon. Barton F Virden

Arkansas County (AR)

Arkansas

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. DWS PET FOR REVW/BRD OF REVW
  2. none.
  3. No Images
  4. LETTER
  5. none.
  6. LETTER
  7. CLERK NOTE
  8. Attorney Alvin Simes would like to brief once record is filed.
  9. No Images
  10. ANSWER AND RECORD FILED
  11. none.
  12. No Images
  13. BRIEFING COMMENCED
  14. Appellant's Brief is due March 01, 2023.
  15. Briefing Commenced
  16. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE
  17. Entry of appearance by Dawn Keliher on behalf of the appellee.
  18. No Images
  19. BRIEF TENDERED
  20. Brief tendered March 1, 2023.
  21. No Images
  22. 7 DAYS TO CORRECT BRIEF
  23. Corrected brief due March 8, 2023.
  24. No Images
  25. APPELLANT'S BRIEF
  26. Appellant's Brief e-filed by attorney. Paper copies not required.
  27. No Images
  28. APPELLEE'S BRIEF
  29. Appellee's Brief e-filed by attorney. Paper copies not required.
  30. BRIEF
  31. CASE SUBMITTED
  32. none.
  33. No Images
  34. MAJORITY OPINION
  35. Affirmed. Klappenbach and Wood, JJ., agree.
  36. OPINION
  37. OPINION PANEL
  38. none.
  39. No Images
  40. CLERK NOTE
  41. Opinion mailed to Herman Hampton 34 Cypress Creek Marion, AR 72364.
  42. No Images

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more