Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-08-31
Status INACTIVE
Type Consumer Debt
Docket 37 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Capital One, N.a.
Defendant Shatina M Roddy
Photo of Hon. DEENA R CALABRESE

Judge

Hon. DEENA R CALABRESE

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED: COMPLAINT
  2. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID LYONS, DOUGHTY & VELDHUIS, P.C
  3. REFUND BALANCE OF CASE COST DEPOSIT TO LYONS, DOUGHTY & VELDHUIS, P.C
  4. JUDGMENT ENTRY(53555590) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: SHATINA M RODDY 1268 WINSTON RD SOUTH EUCLID, OH 44121
  5. JUDGMENT ENTRY(53555589) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: JESSICA E. GOLDSTEIN [email protected]
  6. JUDGMENT ENTRY(53555588) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: JESSICA E. GOLDSTEIN [email protected]
  7. JUDGMENT ENTRY(53555587) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: JACKSON T. MOYER [email protected]
  8. JUDGMENT ENTRY(53555586) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: JACKSON T. MOYER [email protected]
  9. JUDGMENT ENTRY(53555585) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: JACKSON T. MOYER [email protected]
  10. AGREED JUDGMENT ENTRY. OSJ. FINAL. COURT COST ASSESSED AS DIRECTED. PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  11. FINAL PRETRIAL SCHEDULED FOR 04/25/2024 AT 11:00 AM IS CANCELLED.
  12. TRIAL SCHEDULED FOR 05/21/2024 AT 09:30 AM IS CANCELLED.
  13. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE DISPOSITIVE MOTION, FILED 01/30/2024, IS UNOPPOSED, IS WELL TAKEN, AND IS HEREBY GRANTED. ANY DISPOSITIVE MOTION SHALL BE FILED NO LATER THAN 04/16/2024. NOTICE ISSUED
  14. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 02/22/2024 - UNOPPOSED AND GRANTED
  15. DEFENDANT SHATINA M RODDY'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DISCOVERY, FILED 12/06/2023, IS UNOPPOSED AND GRANTED. DEFENDANT IS TO RESPOND TO REFERENCED DISCOVERY ON OR BEFORE 01/15/2024. NOTICE ISSUED
  16. D1 SHATINA M RODDY MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DISCOVERY PRO SE 9999999 01/03/2024 - UNOPPOSED AND GRANTED
  17. NOTICE FILED BY P1 CAPITAL ONE, N.A. ATTORNEY JESSICA E. GOLDSTEIN 0081662 NOTICE OF SERVICE
  18. NOTICE FILED BY P1 CAPITAL ONE, N.A. ATTORNEY JACKSON T. MOYER 0081119 PLAINTIFF'S INITIAL DISCLOSURE UNDER CIV. R. 26(B)(3)
  19. NOTICE FILED BY P1 CAPITAL ONE, N.A. ATTORNEY JESSICA E. GOLDSTEIN 0081662 NOTICE OF SERVICE
  20. UNSCHEDULED EVENT HELD ON 11/07/2023. DEFENDANT FILED AN ANSWER ON 11/03/2023. THE LITIGATION SCHEDULE WILL BE AS FOLLOWS: ALL DISCOVERY TO BE COMPLETED BY 01/31/2024. DISPOSITIVE MOTION TO BE FILED BY 02/16/2024. RESPONSE/REPLY DUE PER OHIO R. CIV. P. 6(C). FINAL PRETRIAL SET FOR 04/25/2024 AT 11:00 AM. ALL PARTIES AND CHOSEN REPRESENTATIVES MUST BE PRESENT WITH FULL, FINAL, AND IMMEDIATE SETTLEMENT AUTHORITY. IF THE REAL PARTY IN INTEREST IS AN INSURANCE COMPANY, CORPORATION, COMMON CARRIER, OR OTHER ENTITY, THEN THE CHOSEN REPRESENTATIVE MUST BE THE PERSON WITH FULL, FINAL, AND IMMEDIATE AUTHORITY TO NEGOTIATE AND ENTER INTO A BINDING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AS TO ALL CLAIMS. A GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY SHALL SEND A REPRESENTATIVE AUTHORIZED TO ACT ON ITS BEHALF. PARTIES ARE EXPECTED TO NEGOTIATE IN GOOD FAITH. FAILURE TO DO SO MAY RESULT IN SANCTIONS. THE PARTIES ARE FURTHER DIRECTED TO SUBMIT PRETRIAL STATEMENTS AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS IN ADVANCE OF THE FINAL PRETRIAL. THE PRETRIAL STATEMENTS SHALL SET FORTH THE FOLLOWING: (1) STATEMENT OF FACTS AND LEGAL ISSUES; (2) STATEMENT OF REAL FACTUAL AND LEGAL ISSUES IN DISPUTE; (3) STIPULATIONS; (4) LIST OF NON-EXPERT TRIAL WITNESSES WITH A BRIEF SUMMARY OF EXPECTED TESTIMONY; (5) LIST OF EXPERT TRIAL WITNESSES WITH REPORTS ATTACHED; (6) SPECIAL LEGAL PROBLEMS ANTICIPATED; (8) PRETRIAL MOTIONS CONTEMPLATED; (9) LATEST DEMAND/OFFER. ON SOME OCCASIONS THE COURT'S SCHEDULE MAY PREVENT THE JUDGE FROM CONDUCTING THE FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE IN PERSON. IF THE ATTORNEYS BELIEVE IT IS ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY THAT THE JUDGE CONDUCT THE FINAL PRETRIAL IN PERSON, THE PARTIES ARE DIRECTED TO CONTACT THE JUDICIAL STAFF ATTORNEY AT LEAST SEVENTY-TWO (72) HOURS IN ADVANCE TO MAKE SUCH A REQUEST. IN ANY INSTANCE WHERE THE JUDGE HAS A CONFLICT, THE COURT WILL RESET THE FINAL PRETRIAL IN ORDER TO ALLOW THE JUDGE TO PRESIDE IN PERSON. BENCH TRIAL SET FOR 05/21/2024 AT 09:30 AM. ANY MOTION TO CONTINUE THE TRIAL DATE SHALL BE MADE IN WRITING AND CAPTIONED "MOTION TO CONTINUE THE TRIAL DATE." IF ALL PARTIES OR CERTAIN PARTIES AGREE TO THE MOTION TO CONTINUE THE TRIAL DATE, SUCH AGREEMENT SHALL BE REFLECTED IN THE CAPTION. THE COURT WILL NOT RULE ON AMBIGUOUSLY TITLED MOTIONS WHICH ARE, IN EFFECT, MOTIONS FOR A CONTINUANCE (E.G., A MOTION TO RESET CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE). ANY MOTION FILED WHICH DOES NOT FULFILL THE CRITERIA ABOVE WILL BE SUMMARILY DENIED OR STRICKEN. THE PARTIES ARE FURTHER DIRECTED TO FAMILIARIZE THEMSELVES WITH THE COURT'S STANDING ORDER ON LITIGATION PREFERENCES, AVAILABLE AS OF THIS WRITING AT HTTPS://CP.CUYAHOGACOUNTY.US/COURT-RESOURCES/JUDGES/JUDGE-DEENA-R-CALABRESE. THE PARTIES ARE EXPECTED TO REVIEW THE STANDING ORDER REGULARLY FOR UPDATES. THE STANDING ORDER APPLIES UNLESS SPECIFICALLY SUPERSEDED BY JOURNAL ENTRY. THE PARTIES ARE HEREBY PLACED ON NOTICE THAT IF THIS MATTER IS NOT RESOLVED THROUGH NEGOTIATIONS OR DISPOSITIVE MOTION PRACTICE, THE COURT CONTEMPLATES A LOCAL RULE 21.0 REFERRAL TO ARBITRATION. NOTICE ISSUED
  21. ANSWER & DEFENSES OF SHATINA RODDY . PRO SE (9999999)
  22. SUMS COMPLAINT(52097723) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: SHATINA M RODDY 1268 WINSTON RD SOUTH EUCLID, OH 44121 ANSWER DATE: 11/09/2023
  23. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  24. WRIT FEE
  25. REQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED INSTRUCTIONS FOR SERVICE: ORDINARY MAIL SERVICE
  26. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 51761873 RETURNED 9/21/2023 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT RODDY/SHATINA/M - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  27. SUMS COMPLAINT(51761873) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: SHATINA M RODDY 1268 WINSTON RD SOUTH EUCLID, OH 44121
  28. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  29. WRIT FEE
  30. JUDGE DEENA R CALABRESE ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  31. LEGAL RESEARCH
  32. LEGAL NEWS
  33. LEGAL AID
  34. COURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  35. COMPUTER FEE
  36. CLERK'S FEE
  37. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID JACKSON T. MOYER

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more