Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Oklahoma unified county

Court

Oklahoma unified county

Oklahoma

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-07-17
Type Declaratory And Injunctive Relief
Docket 29 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Leeson Crutchfieldalberta,
Defendant Leesonallen, leesonmaxine,
Photo of Hon. Estes Burl

Judge

Hon. Estes Burl

Osage County (OK)

Oklahoma

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  2. OK COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
  3. 10% OF CASA TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  4. OK COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
  5. 10% OF COJC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  6. COURTHOUSE SECURITY FEE
  7. 10% OF CHSC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  8. STATE JUDICIAL REV. FUND INTERPRETER & TRANSLATOR SERVICES
  9. 15% TO DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND
  10. COURT CLERK PRESERVATION FUND
  11. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRIANING ORDER AND TEMPORARU INJUNCTIN AND SUPPORTING BRIEF
  12. ORDER AND NOTICE OF HEARING ON THE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY INJUNCTION
  13. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE
  14. CM, BOE, THIS MATTER COMES ON FOR HEARING THE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY INJUNCTION. THE HEARING SET FOR TODAY IS CONTINUED SO PLAINTIFF CAN OBTAIN SERVICE. THE MATTER IS RESET FOR OCTOBER 20, 2023 AT 10:00AM
  15. CT MINUTE
  16. DEFENDANTS' ANSWER TO PLAINTIFFS' PETITION FOR INJUNCTION AND DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
  17. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE
  18. DEFENDANT'S SUGGESTION OF DEATH OF PLAINTIFF ALBERTA LEESON-CRUTCHFIELD UPON THE RECORD AND MOTION FOR AN ORDER OF SUBSTITUTION OF PARTIES
  19. COURT REPORTER FEE
  20. AJE: COST DUE TO CARD ALLOCATION FEE
  21. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  22. PLAINTIFF'S ANSWER TO DEFENDANTS' SUGGESTION OF DEATH OF PLAINTIFF ALBERTS LEESON- CRUTCHFIELD UPON THE RECORD AND MOTION FOR AN ORDER OF SUBSTUTION OF PARTIES
  23. CM, BOE, PLAINTIFF W/ ATTY CHRIS MOSSIR, DEFT W/ ATTY ROBERT GETHELL, COURT REPORTER- AMY SHERRICK, COMES BEFORE THE COURT ON THE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND TEMPORARY INJUNCTION. PLAINTIFF, KIMBERLY LEESON PRESENT WITH COUNSEL AND DEFENDANTS PRESENT WITH COUNSEL. PARTIES ANNOUNCE READY. COURT HEARS TESTIMONY FROM PLAINTIFF'S WITNESSES, 1) KIMBERLY LEESON AND 2) KENNETH LEESON. WITNESSES SWORN AND TESTIFIES. PLAINTIFF RESTS, DEFENDANT CALLS NO WITNEESSES, RESTS. COURT HEARS ARGUMENTS OF BOTH COUNSEL AND FINDS THAT THERE HAS NOT BEEN PRESENTED TO THE COURT SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE THAT WARRANTS THE ISSUANCE OF THE TEMPORARY INJUNCTION UNDER THE FACTORS THE COURT IS TO CONSIDER FOR 1) LIKLIHOOD OF PREVAILING BY THE PLAINTIFFS IN THE ACTION, 2) WHETHER PLAINTIFF'S WILL SUFFER IRREPARABLE HARM IN THE ABSENCE OF AN INJUNCTION 3) WHETHER IRREPARABLE HARM SUFFERED BY PLAINTIFFS WOULD BE OUTWEIGHED BY THE IRREPARABLE HARM TO DEFENDANT, 4) PUBLIC INTEREST. COURT ALSO ADVISED OF THE SUGGESTION OF DEATH BY THE FIRST NAMED PLAINTIFF WHO IS THE FEE SIMPLE TITLE HOLDER IN THIS MATTER. COURT ADMONISHED PARTIES TO WITHHOLD HINDERANCE OF INGRESS AND EGRESS ONTO PROPERTY AND INSTRUCTS COUNSEL THAT THIS MATTER WILL BE RESET UPON APPLICATION PENDING ISSUE OF PROBATE MOTION FOR TEMPORARY INJUNCTION AND TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER DENIED.
  24. CT MINUTE
  25. APPLICATION TO WITHDRAW AS ATTORNEY OF RECORD
  26. ORDER ALLOWING WITHDRAW

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more