Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-08-23
Status INACTIVE
Type Contract
Docket 27 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Lvnv Funding Llc
Defendant Nathaniel J Sinclair
Photo of Hon. DEENA R CALABRESE

Judge

Hon. DEENA R CALABRESE

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED: COMPLAINT
  2. REFUND BALANCE OF CASE COST DEPOSIT TO STENGER & STENGER P.C.
  3. JUDGMENT ENTRY(53428707) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: NATHANIEL J SINCLAIR 3798 FREEMONT RD SOUTH EUCLID, OH 44121
  4. JUDGMENT ENTRY(53428706) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: ANTHONY HUSPASKA [email protected]
  5. JUDGMENT ENTRY(53428705) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: ANTHONY HUSPASKA [email protected]
  6. THIS CAUSE CAME TO BE HEARD UPON PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, WHICH DEFENDANT HAS NOT OPPOSED. AFTER A REVIEW OF THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER MATTERS NECESSARY TO DETERMINE THE TRUTH OF PLAINTIFFS STATEMENTS AND ALLEGED DAMAGES, AND A DECISION HAVING BEEN DULY RENDERED, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED THAT PROPER SERVICE OF SUMMONS ON THE DEFENDANT HAS BEEN OBTAINED AND THAT DEFENDANT FAILED TO PLEAD OR OTHERWISE DEFEND IN THE WITHIN PROCEEDING IN THE TIME PERIOD SPECIFIED UNDER OHIO CIVIL RULE 12. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED PURSUANT TO OHIO CIVIL RULE 55, DEFAULT JUDGMENT IS HEREBY RENDERED AGAINST THE DEFENDANT IN THE AMOUNT OF $15,201.00 (FIFTEEN THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED ONE AND 00/100 DOLLARS), LESS PAYMENT(S)/CREDIT(S) OF $0.00, WITH INTEREST THEREON AT THE RATE OF 8.00% PER ANNUM FROM THE ELATE OF JUDGMENT, PLUS COSTS. IT IS SO ORDERED. NO JUST CAUSE FOR DELAY. THIS ENTRY TERMINATES THE CASE AND IS A FINAL, APPEALABLE ORDER. COURT COST ASSESSED TO THE DEFENDANT(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  7. AFFIDAVIT FILED BY P1 LVNV FUNDING LLC ATTORNEY ANTHONY HUSPASKA 0087618 MILITARY SERVICE AFFIDAVIT
  8. MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT 03/28/2024 - UNOPPOSED AND GRANTED
  9. DEFAULT HEARING SET FOR 03/28/2024 AT 08:30 AM. NON-ORAL DEFAULT HEARING SCHEDULED FOR THE DATE AND TIME REFERENCED ABOVE. DO NOT APPEAR AT THE COURTHOUSE FOR THE NON-ORAL HEARING. PLAINTIFF IS DIRECTED TO FILE A RULE 55 MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT NO LATER THAN FRIDAY, 03/08/2024. PLAINTIFF IS ALSO ORDERED TO FILE, ALONG WITH THE MOTION, AN AFFIDAVIT OF DAMAGES, A MILITARY AFFIDAVIT, A SERVICE AFFIDAVIT, AND ANY OTHER EVIDENTIARY MATERIALS NECESSARY TO SUPPORT THE MOTION. PLAINTIFF MUST ALSO SUBMIT A PROPOSED JOURNAL ENTRY. THE PROPOSED ENTRY MUST BE SUBMITTED AS A PROPOSED ORDER IN MS WORD FORMAT, NOT FILED ON THE DOCKET AS A PDF. IF NECESSARY, COUNSEL SHOULD CONSULT THE E-FILING USER MANUAL OR CONTACT THE E-FILING HELP DESK. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS COURT ORDER CAN RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE, WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE, FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. DEFENDANT WILL HAVE UNTIL AND INCLUDING MONDAY, 03/25/2024 TO FILE A RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION. NON-ORAL HEARING WILL BE HELD THURSDAY, 03/28/2024. NO EXTENSIONS WILL BE GIVEN. COUNSEL AND PARTIES ARE NOT TO APPEAR AT THE COURTHOUSE FOR THE NON-ORAL HEARING. NOTICE ISSUED
  10. SUMS COMPLAINT(52809826) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: NATHANIEL J SINCLAIR 3798 FREEMONT RD SOUTH EUCLID, OH 44121 ANSWER DATE: 02/13/2024
  11. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  12. WRIT FEE
  13. PRAECIPE FILED PRAECIPE FOR ORDINARY MAIL SERVICE
  14. PURSUANT TO CIVIL RULE 4(E), PLAINTIFF HAS 6 MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF THE FILING OF THE COMPLAINT TO PERFECT SERVICE ON ALL DEFENDANTS. PLAINTIFF HAS UNTIL AND INCLUDING 02/23/2024 TO PERFECT SERVICE. FAILURE TO DO SO WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF ANY DEFENDANTS THAT HAVE NOT BEEN SERVED. NOTICE ISSUED
  15. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 51477888 RETURNED 09/16/2023 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT SINCLAIR/NATHANIEL/J - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  16. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 51477888 RETURNED 9/16/2023 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT SINCLAIR/NATHANIEL/J - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  17. SUMS COMPLAINT(51477888) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: NATHANIEL J SINCLAIR 3798 FREEMONT RD SOUTH EUCLID, OH 44121
  18. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  19. WRIT FEE
  20. JUDGE DEENA R CALABRESE ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  21. LEGAL RESEARCH
  22. LEGAL NEWS
  23. LEGAL AID
  24. COURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  25. COMPUTER FEE
  26. CLERK'S FEE
  27. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID ANTHONY HUSPASKA

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more