Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Danbury County

Court

Danbury County

Connecticut

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-06-27
Type T 28 Torts Malpractice Medical
Docket 48 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Margaret Vincek Administratrix Of The Estate Of Stefanie A. Vincek
Defendant Nuvance Health, Inc.|Western Connecticut Health Network, Inc.|The Danbury Hospital|Nuvance Health Medical Practice, Ct, Inc.

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. OTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER Joint Motion for Modification of the Scheduling Order and Trial Date
  2. OMPLAINT
  3. PPEARANCE Appearance
  4. ETURN OF SERVICE
  5. LAIM FOR JURY OF 6
  6. OTION TO TRANSFER Motion to Transfer to the Judicial District of Danbury RESULT: Granted 8/21/2023 HON SUSAN COBB
  7. RDER RESULT: Granted 8/21/2023 HON SUSAN COBB
  8. OTICE TO ALL PARTIES Plaintiff's Notice of Filing IRP on all defendants
  9. OTICE Defendants' Notice of Service of Practice Book Forms 217, 218 and 219 (Interrogatories and RFP)
  10. RANSFERRED FROM SUPERIOR COURT JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD
  11. RANSFERRED TO SUPERIOR COURT JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY
  12. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD RESULT: Granted 9/11/2023 HON MAXIMINO MEDINA
  13. RDER RESULT: Granted 9/11/2023 HON MAXIMINO MEDINA
  14. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD RESULT: Withdrawn 9/21/2023 BY THE DEFENDANT
  15. ITHDRAWAL OF MOTION Motion for Extension of Time 108.00
  16. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD RESULT: Order 10/10/2023 HON MAXIMINO MEDINA
  17. RDER RESULT: Order 10/10/2023 HON MAXIMINO MEDINA
  18. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE DISCOVERY MOTION OR REQUEST PB CH13 Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time
  19. RDER RESULT: Order 10/25/2023 HON MAXIMINO MEDINA
  20. OTICE OF COMPLIANCE Plaintiff's Compliance with IRP
  21. CHEDULING ORDER Joint Scheduling Order RESULT: Order 2/15/2024 HON BARBARA BRAZZEL-MASSARO
  22. RDER RESULT: Order 2/15/2024 HON BARBARA BRAZZEL-MASSARO
  23. CHEDULING ORDER Joint Revised Scheduling Order RESULT: Granted 2/28/2024 HON BARBARA BRAZZEL-MASSARO
  24. RDER RESULT: Granted 2/28/2024 HON BARBARA BRAZZEL-MASSARO
  25. NSWER Answer to Complaint
  26. ERTIFICATE OF CLOSED PLEADINGS AND CLAIM FOR TRIAL LIST
  27. OTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER JOINT MOTION FOR MODIFICATION OF THE SCHEDULING ORDER RESULT: Granted 9/30/2024 HON MAXIMINO MEDINA
  28. RDER RESULT: Granted 9/30/2024 HON MAXIMINO MEDINA
  29. FFER OF COMPROMISE
  30. BJECTION TO MOTION OR REQUEST FOR DISCOVERY PB CH13 OBJECTION TO NOTICE OF DEPOSITION OF MARGARET VINCEK
  31. OTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER JOINT MOTION FOR MODIFICATION OF THE SCHEDULING ORDER RESULT: Granted 4/14/2025 HON MAXIMINO MEDINA
  32. RDER RESULT: Granted 4/14/2025 HON MAXIMINO MEDINA
  33. OTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF SCHEDULING ORDER AND TRIAL DATE
  34. BJECTION Objection to Request for Production and to Deposition of Person Most Knowledgeable Re: Audit Trails
  35. OTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER Defendants' Motion to Modify Scheduling Order and Trial Date
  36. BJECTION TO MOTION Plaintiff's Objection to Defendants' MET of the Scheduling Order and Trial Date
  37. RDER Re: order on #121, #123 and #124 RESULT: Order 6/3/2025 HON MAXIMINO MEDINA
  38. OTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER RESULT: Order 9/3/2025 HON MAXIMINO MEDINA
  39. RDER 9/15/25 10:30 a.m. in-person heraing RESULT: Order 9/3/2025 HON MAXIMINO MEDINA
  40. OTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER Joint Motion to Modify Scheduling Order RESULT: Withdrawn 7/31/2025 BY THE PLAINTIFF
  41. ITHDRAWAL OF MOTION
  42. OTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER Joint Motion to Modify Scheduling Order
  43. BJECTION TO MOTION Plaintiff's Objection to Motion for Protective Order
  44. EQUEST FOR ARGUMENT - NON-ARG MATTER (JD-CV-128) RESULT: Granted 9/3/2025 HON MAXIMINO MEDINA
  45. RDER RESULT: Granted 9/3/2025 HON MAXIMINO MEDINA
  46. EPLY Reply in Support of Motion for Protective Order
  47. OTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER Joint Motion for Modification of the Scheduling Order and Trial Date RESULT: Withdrawn 9/3/2025 BY THE PLAINTIFF
  48. ITHDRAWAL OF MOTION Withdraw Motion 133.00

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more