Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Oklahoma unified county

Court

Oklahoma unified county

Oklahoma

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2021-08-24
Type Complaint
Docket 52 entries
Disposition without prejudice
Photo of Hon. HENDERSON, JUDGE BRIAN C.

Judge

Hon. HENDERSON, JUDGE BRIAN C.

Atoka County (OK)

Oklahoma

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. FILE & ENTER PETITION (ALL OTHER CIVIL W/LTF)
  2. OKLAHOMA COURT INFORMATION SYSTEM FEE - EFFECTIVE 07/01/04
  3. PDLTF
  4. OK COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
  5. 10% OF CASA TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  6. OK COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
  7. 10% OF COJC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  8. CHSC FEE
  9. 10% CHSC TO CCRF
  10. STATE JUDICIAL REV. FUND INTERPRETER & TRANSLATOR SERVICES
  11. 15% TO DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND
  12. COURT CLERK PRESERVATION FUND
  13. SUMMONS ISSUED TO ATTORNEY
  14. RETURN OF SERVICE FILED
  15. MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY AND FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
  16. FILED
  17. RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY AND
  18. FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FILED
  19. ANSWER FILED
  20. ORDER FILED (DISPO;STRICKEN 2-22 JT)
  21. ORDER FILED (DISC 8-31-22;PTC 9-1-22 @ 10;NJT 10-6-22 @
  22. 10 AM)
  23. ORDER FILED (WITNESS/EXH 9-16-22; NJT 11-10-22 @ 10AM)
  24. ORDER FILED (NJT 11-30-22 @ 10AM)
  25. ORDER FILED (REMOVAL OF TRUSTEE;SUCCESOR
  26. APPOINTED;CONKLIN TO PREPARE FORMAL ORDER;HRG 1-19-23 @
  27. 10AM)
  28. ORDER UPON PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR REMOVAL OF TRUSTEE
  29. FILED
  30. ORDER FILED (HRG CONT'D TO 2-22-23 @ 10AM)
  31. ORDER FILED (CONKLIN TO DO FORMAL ORDER)
  32. LIST OF CONTENTS OF THE REVOCABLE INTER VIVOS TRUST OF
  33. CHARLES C BREWSTER FILED
  34. ORDER FILED
  35. CERTIFICATE OF DEATH FILED
  36. MEMORANDUM OF DECLARATION OF TRUST FILED
  37. OBJECTION TO INVENTORY LIST SUBMITTED BY GLRIA LOVEL
  38. BREWSTER AND TERRY GEORGE BREWSTER FILED
  39. MOTION AND ORDER REQUESTING ACCOUNTING OF TRUST FILED
  40. (MOTION SET FOR 5-11-23 @ 10AM)
  41. APPLICATION AND ORDER FOR COURT APPPOINTED COUNSEL - FOR CIVIL - FILED
  42. THE COURT HAVING REVIEWED DEFENDANT'S APPLICATION FOR COURT APPOINTED COUNSEL, DOES HEREBY FIND THAT DEFENDANT IS NOT ENTITLED TO COURT APPOINTED CANCEL AND THEREFORE HER REQUEST IS DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED.
  43. MOTION TO RESTORE DEFENDANT AS SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE FILED
  44. ORDER FILED (MT/RESTORE AS SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE HRG 1-10-24 @ 10AM)
  45. THIS MATTER COMES ON FOR HEARING ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO RESTORE DEFENDANT AS SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE. DEFENDANT FAILS TO APPEAR. MOTION IS HEREBY DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS SO ORDERED.
  46. MOTION TO INTERVENE AND OR JOINDER AS PLAINTIFF FILED
  47. NOTICE AND ORDER OF HEARING ON MOTION TO INTERVENE AND JOIN AS PLAINTIFF FILED
  48. MATTER IS SET ON TERRY BREWSTER'S MOTION TO INTERVENE AND JOIN AS PLAINTIFF. THOMAS CONKLIN III, JOY MAXWELL AND JACQUE BREWSTER APPEAR. MOTION TO INTERVENE IS GRANTED. RE-SET FOR FURTHER HEARING ON 9-5-24 AT 10AM. IT IS SO ORDERED.
  49. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO INTERVENE AND/OR JOINDER AS PLAINTIFF FILED
  50. CERTIFICATE OF MAILING FILED
  51. CASE COMES ON FOR STATUS. JOY MAXWELL APPEARS ON BEHALF OF TERRY BREWSTER. THOMAS CONKLIN, III IS PRESENT. DEFENDANT JACQUE BREWSTER DOES NOT APPEAR. THE COURT FINDS THAT A NEW TRUSTEE WAS PREVIOUSLY APPOINTED. THE COURT FURTHER FINDS THAT THIS CASE IS MOOT AND IS HEREBY DISMISSED. IT IS SO ORDERED.

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more