Your case is unique, but you are not alone.
About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.
Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?
How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?
AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Case Information
Lawyers
Docket Entries
- PETITION
- LAW LIBRARY
- DISPUTE MEDIATION
- OKLAHOMA COURT INFORMATION SYSTEM FEE - EFFECTIVE 07/01/04
- LENGTHY TRIAL FUND
- OK COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
- 10% OF CASA TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
- OK COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
- 10% OF COJC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
- COURTHOUSE SECURITY FEE
- 10% OF CHSC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
- STATE JUDICIAL REV. FUND INTERPRETER & TRANSLATOR SERVICES
- 15% TO DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND
- COURT CLERK PRESERVATION FUND
- SUMMONS ISSUED (ATTY TO GET SERVICE)
- ORIG SUMMONS & NOTICE ETC RET'D- SERVED NICKIE DAWN
- HOLLAND 8/10/22
- ORDER AND NOTICE SETTING HEARING ON MERITS(TM)
- S/O: MATTER IS SCHEDULED FOR HOM THIS DATE. PETITIONER
- APPEARS W/COUNSEL. RESPONDENT APPEARS PRO SE. NEITHER
- PARTY HAS COMPETED A COPARENTING COURSE. HOM RESET TO
- 11/8/22 @ 9:00 AM. PARTIES SHALL COMPLETE A COPARENTING
- COURSE PRIOR TO THAT DATE AND FILE PROOF OF COMPLETION
- WITH THE COURT. (TM)
- DIEPC: PARTY COMPLETED DIVORCE IMPACT EDUCATIONAL PROG.
- (JACKSON HOLLAND)
- S/O: COURT REPORTER NOT REQUESTED. HOM HELD THIS DATE.
- PETITIONER APPEARS WITH COUNSEL. RESPONDENT APPEARS NOT
- DESPITE BEING NOTIFIED OF TODAY'S HRG IN OPEN COURT.
- PETITIONER HAS COMPLETED COPARENTING. COURT FINDS GOOD
- CAUSE TO PROCEED WITH DIVORCE DUE TO RESPONDENT'S
- NON-APPEARANCE. COURT GRANTS DECREE ON GROUNDS OF
- INCOMPATIBILITY. CUSTODY OF J.L.H, BORN SEPTEMBER 2007,
- AWARDED TO PETITIONER. VISITATION TO RESPONDENT ON
- FRIDAYS AFTER RESPONDENT GETS OFF WORK TO SUNDAYS AT
- 8:00PM J.N.C. AND C.S. WERE BORN DURING THE MARRIAGE
- BUT ARE NOT PETITIONER'S BIOLOGICAL CHILDREN, AND
- PATERNITY HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. RESPONDENT IS NOT
- PREGNANT. CHILD SUPPORT ORDERED PER GUIDLEINES WITH
- EACH PARENT'S INCOME AT MINIMUM WAGE FOR 40 HOURS/WEEK,
- DUE 1ST OF EACH MONTH, CHILD IS ON SOONER CARE BENEFITS
- THROUGH RESPONDENT. EACH PARTY IS AWARDED HIS/HER OWN
- SEPARATE PROPERTY, MARITAL PROPERTY IN HIS /HER
- POSSESSION, AND DEBT IN HIS/HER OWN NAME. (TM)
Get Free Case Details
Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.
By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.
Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In